The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2017 ) > List of Articles


Presence of Metallic Microfragments on Dentinal Walls and Instrument Defects following Root Canal Preparation

Carlos Estrela, Daniel de A Decurcio, Fernando B Barletta, Caroline Solda, Marina C Langaro, Alessandra N Machado, José R Vanni, Julio A Silva

Citation Information : Estrela C, de A Decurcio D, Barletta FB, Solda C, Langaro MC, Machado AN, Vanni JR, Silva JA. Presence of Metallic Microfragments on Dentinal Walls and Instrument Defects following Root Canal Preparation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (4):270-276.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2030

Published Online: 01-04-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.



To determine the presence of metallic microfragments and their elemental composition in the dentinal walls of root canals following preparation using different endodontic instruments and to assess the active cutting edges of instruments with regard to structural defects.

Materials and methods

A total of 108 molar teeth were selected and prepared using different endodontic instruments. Teeth were randomly divided into nine groups of 12 teeth each, according to the instruments employed: Manual systems – K-FlexoFile, K-File, and Hedstroem; rotary systems – ProTaper Next, Mtwo, BioRaCe; and reciprocating systems – Reciproc, Unicone, and WaveOne. Both root canals and instruments were assessed using scanning electron microscopy, and the elemental composition of metallic microfragments was determined using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.


Metallic microfragments were found in the groups prepared with both manual and reciprocating instruments, with no statistically significant differences between groups, thirds, or presence of metallic microfragments (p ≥ 0.05). Moreover, all groups presented structural defects in both new and used instruments; however, rotary instruments (ProTaper Next, Mtwo 702, BioRaCe) were the ones with the lowest number of defects, at statistically significant differences in comparison with other instruments (p < 0.05).


The presence of metallic microfragments on dentinal walls following root canal preparation was associated with manual and reciprocating instrumentation. Furthermore, rotary instruments were the ones with the lowest number of defects. Considering the outcomes measured in this study, rotary instruments performed better than the other two groups, as they were associated with the lowest number of metallic microfragments and structural defects.

Clinical significance

During root canal preparation, operative procedures may induce changes to the root canal shape, as well as the release of metallic fragments resulting from the action of instruments on dentinal walls. Therefore, it is important to determine, among the different techniques used for this purpose, which ones are least susceptible to this occurrence.

How to cite this article

Solda C, Langaro MC, Machado AN, Vanni JR, de A Decurcio D, Silva JA, Estrela C, Barletta FB. Presence of Metallic Microfragments on Dentinal Walls and Instrument Defects following Root Canal Preparation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(4):270-276.

PDF Share
  1. Characterization of successful root canal treatment. Braz Dent J 2014 Jan-Feb;25(1):3-11.
  2. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012 Jul;45(7):614-618.
  3. Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010 Jan;36(1):157-159.
  4. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 1: relationship between observed imperfections and factors leading to such defects in a cohort study. J Endod 2009 Jan;35(1):129-132.
  5. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000 Mar;26(3):161-165.
  6. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper instruments. J Endod 2007 Jan;33(1):55-57.
  7. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997 Feb;23(2):77-85.
  8. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012 Apr;38(4):541-544.
  9. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013 Feb;39(2):258-261.
  10. HyFlex EDM: superficial features, metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of innovative electro discharge machined NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2016 May;49(5):483-493.
  11. Wear of nickel-titanium lightspeed instruments evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. J Endod 1999 Jul;25(7):494-497.
  12. Characterization of calcium oxide in root perforation sealer materials. Braz Dent J 2012 Oct;23(5):539-546.
  13. Assessment of elemental composition, microstructure, and hardness of stainless steel endodontic files and reamers. J Endod 2004 Jul;30(7):523-526.
  14. Wear and metallographic analysis of WaveOne and reciproc NiTi instruments before and after three uses in root canals. Scanning 2014 Sep-Oct;36(5):517-525.
  15. A metallurgical characterization of ten endodontic Ni-Ti instruments: assessing the clinical relevance of shape memory and superelastic properties of Ni-Ti endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 2010 Feb;43(2):125-134.
  16. Bending properties of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003 Dec;96(6):757-763.
  17. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000 Jul;33(4):297-310.
  18. Surface analysis of ProFile instruments by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy: a preliminary study. Int Endod J 2002 Oct;35(10):848-853.
  19. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988 Jul;14(7):346-351.
  20. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Braz Dent J 2002;13(2):113-117.
  21. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study. J Endod 2014 Oct;40(10):1627-1631.
  22. Influence of rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2009 Jul;35(7):1013-1016.
  23. Chemical elements characterization of root canal sealers using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014;13(1):27-34.
  24. Micro-computed tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of the distal root of mandibular first molar. J Endod 2015 Feb;41(2):231-236.
  25. Effectiveness of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for cleaning flattened root canals. J Endod 2002 May;28(5):365-366.
  26. A Relação do Diâmetro Cirúrgico na Limpeza de Canais Radiculares Preparados Com o Sistema Hero 642: Análise Histológica [Dissertação]. Ribeirão Preto, SP: UNAERP; 2006. p. 106.
  27. Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2010 Jan;36(1):147-152.
  28. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod 2003 Jan;29(1):15-19.
  29. Stress distribution of three NiTi rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using a mathematic analysis. Int Endod J 2009 Jan;42(1):14-21.
  30. Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: a comprehensive review- Part II: properties and effectiveness. J Endod 2015 Dec;41(12):1939-1950.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.