Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Restorations with Three different Adhesive Systems
Satish Sharma, Shamim Anjum, Azar Malik
Citation Information :
Sharma S, Anjum S, Malik A. Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Restorations with Three different Adhesive Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (6):497-500.
This study was conducted to evaluate the microleakage of class V cavities restored with composite resin and different adhesive systems.
Materials and methods
In this experimental epidemiological investigation, a total of 75 freshly extracted human teeth were collected. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n = 25). Three different intermediate adhesive materials (Clearfil SE Bond, Single Bond, and Xeno III) were used for each group.
Results
On testing without the application of occlusal load, the maximum microleakage was seen for group III (Xeno III) followed by group I (Clearfil SE) and then group II (Single Bond). On application of occlusal load, the maximum microleakage was seen for group III (Xeno III) followed by group II (Single Bond) and then group I (Clearfil SE Bond). The data were analyzed statistically using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann– Whitney U test.
Conclusion
Group III showed the maximum amount of microleakage both with and without occlusal load.
Clinical significance
All adhesives under investigation exhibited a certain amount of microleakage in enamel and dentin.
How to cite this article
Anjum S, Malik A, Sharma S. Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Restorations with Three different Adhesive Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(6):497-500.
An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003 Oct;134(10):1382-1390.
Tooth surface loss revisited: classification, etiology, and management. J Res Dent 2015 May;3(2):37-43.
Dimensional change measurements of conventional and flowable composite resins using a laser displacement sensor. Dent Mater J 2009 Sep;28(5):544-551.
Cyclic mechanical loading promotes bacterial penetration along composite restoration marginal gaps. Dent Mater 2015 Jun;31(6):702-710.
Microleakage of different resin composite types. Quintessence Int 2004 Nov-Dec;35(10):790-794.
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of composite restorations using fifth and seventh generations of adhesive systems. Caspian J Dent Res 2014 Sep;3(2):14-19.
Effect of the cavity configuration factor on the marginal microleakage of esthetic restorative materials. Am J Dent 2003 Jun;16(3):211-214.
Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations. J Conserv Dent 2010 Jan;13(1):9-15.
A comparative evaluation of microleakage around class V cavities restored with different tooth colored restorative materials. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014 Mar;13(1):120-126.
Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: an ex vivo study. Contemp Clin Dent 2011 Apr;2(2):94-97.
Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent 2014 Jan;8(1):1-8.
Evaluation of microleakage in posterior nanocomposite restorations with adhesive liners. J Conserv Dent 2011 Apr;14(2):178-181.
Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976 Sep;4(5):199-206.
Scanning electron microscopic insight to the hybrid layer in resin composite restored cervical lesions. J Int Oral Health 2016 Apr;8(4):415-421.
The effect of thermocycling on microleakage of several commercially available composite Class V restorations in vitro. J Prosthet Dent 2003 Aug;90(2):168-174.
Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2004 Jan;91(1):42-45.
The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of Class V restorations. Oper Dent 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):135-141.
Effect of self-etching adhesives on dentin permeability in a fluid flow model. J Prosthet Dent 2005 Jan;93(1):56-63.
