The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2017 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Preserving the Bone Profile in Anterior Maxilla using an Equine Cortical Bone Membrane and an Equine Enzyme-treated Bone Graft: A Case Report with 5-year Follow-up

Danilo Alessio Di Stefano, Umberto Garagiola, Mirko A Bassi

Citation Information : Stefano DA, Garagiola U, Bassi MA. Preserving the Bone Profile in Anterior Maxilla using an Equine Cortical Bone Membrane and an Equine Enzyme-treated Bone Graft: A Case Report with 5-year Follow-up. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (7):614-621.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2094

Published Online: 00-07-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to report a well-succeeded use of equine enzyme-deantigenic cortical membrane and bone granules for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the esthetic zone concomitant with implant placement.

Background

In the anterior maxilla, where patients typically have the highest expectations for implant-supported restorations, bone resorption in the wake of tooth loss often leads to a lack of soft tissue support and ultimately to unsatisfactory esthetic results. Buccal bone augmentation at the time of implant placement has thus become common. This is usually accomplished following GBR principles and employing membranes made from various materials to serve as a barrier between the soft tissue and graft material. One of the more recently introduced membrane materials is made from thin, flexible equine cortical bone, i.e., rendered nonantigenic in an enzymatic process that preserves native bone collagen.

Case report

This report describes the treatment of a patient who received an equine enzyme-deantigenic graft and membrane in conjunction with placement of an implant in the right maxillary lateral incisor site.

Conclusion

After 5 years of follow-up, the patient was very satisfied with her appearance. A cone-beam computed tomography scan showed that the peri-implant bone levels and ridge thickness had been maintained, and the cortical layer in the pristine ridge had also undergone remodeling.

Clinical significance

Guided bone regeneration with the concomitant use of enzyme-deantigenic membrane and graft is a valuable and suitable option for effective implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation in the esthetic zone.

How to cite this article

Di Stefano DA, Garagiola U, Bassi MA. Preserving the Bone Profile in Anterior Maxilla using an Equine Cortical Bone Membrane and an Equine Enzyme-treated Bone Graft: A Case Report with 5-year Follow-up. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(7):614-621.


PDF Share
  1. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005 Feb;32(2):212-218.
  2. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004 Feb;19 (Suppl):30-42.
  3. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22 (Suppl):49-70.
  4. Bone regeneration adjacent to titanium dental implants using guided tissue regeneration: a report of two cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990 Spring;5(1):9-14.
  5. Vertical ridge augmentation: What is the limit? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996 Jun;16(3):220-229.
  6. Effect of membranes and porous hydroxyapatite on healing in bone defects around titanium dental implants. An experimental study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991 Oct;2(4):172-178.
  7. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 Summer;7(2):2332-2345.
  8. Barrier membranes–materials review, Part I of II. Dent Implantol Update 2011 Sep;22(9):61-64.
  9. Absorbable collagen membranes for periodontal regeneration: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2013 Sep;92(9):773-781.
  10. High-density polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in guided bone and tissue regeneration procedures: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014 Jan;43(1):75-84.
  11. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014 Nov;19(6):e639-e646.
  12. 1982-1992: a decade of technology development for guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 1993 Nov;64(Suppl 11):1129-11237.
  13. GBR-based restoration of peri-implant defect with an equine flexible cortical bone membrane and heterologous equine bone. Ital Oral Surg 2011 Feb;10(1):5-14.
  14. Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications. J Prosthodont Res 2013 Jan;57(1):3-14.
  15. The effects of porosity on endothelialization of ePTFE implanted in subcutaneous and adipose tissue. J Biomed Mater Res 1997 Mar;34(4):463-476.
  16. Bone augmentation at titanium implants using autologous bone grafts and a bioresorbable barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997 Apr;8(2):82-89.
  17. Augmentation of the rat mandible using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994 Jun;5(2):75-82.
  18. Periosteum: biology, regulation, and response to osteoporosis therapies. Bone 2004 Nov;35(5):1003-1012.
  19. Biology of allografting. Orthop Clin North Am 1998 Apr;29(2):199-204.
  20. Osseointegration: a reality. Periodontol 2000 1998 Jun;17:22-35.
  21. Regeneration of atrophic crestal ridges with resorbable lamina: technical note. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2015 Sep;29(3 Suppl 1):97-100.
  22. The bone lamina technique: a novel approach for lateral ridge augmentation–a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013 Jul-Aug;33(4):491-497.
  23. ; Khoury, CH. Mandibular bone block grafts: diagnosis, instrumentation, harvesting techniques and surgical procedures. In: Khoury F, Antoun H, Missika P, editors. Bone Augment in Oral Implantology. Berlin: Quintessence; 2007.
  24. Cell-matrix interaction in bone: type I collagen modulates signal transduction in osteoblast-like cells. Am J Physiol 1995 May;268(5 Pt 1):C1090-C1103.
  25. Type I collagen in xenogenic bone material regulates attachment and spreading of osteoblasts over the beta1 integrin subunit. Orthopade 1998 Feb;27(2):136-142.
  26. Type I collagen-induced osteoblastic differentiation of bone-marrow cells mediated by collagen-alpha2beta1 integrin interaction. J Cell Physiol 2000 Aug;184(2):207-213.
  27. Type I collagen induces expression of bone morphogenetic protein receptor Type II. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001 May;283(2):316-322.
  28. Evaluation of the effect of heterologous Type I collagen on healing of bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002 May;60(5):541-545.
  29. Effect of Type I collagen on the adhesion, proliferation, and osteoblastic gene expression of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Chin J Traumatol 2004 Dec;7(6):358-362.
  30. The effect on osteogenesis of Type I collagen applied to experimental bone defects. Dent Traumatol 2004 Dec;20(6):334-337.
  31. The size exclusion characteristics of Type I collagen: implications for the role of noncollagenous bone constituents in mineralization. J Biol Chem 2007 Aug;282(31):22437-22447.
  32. Human osteoclast formation and activity on an equine spongy bone substitute. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009 Jan;20(1):17-23.
  33. Human osteoclast formation and activity on a xenogenous bone mineral. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009 Jul;90(1):238-246.
  34. Sinus lift with autologous bone alone or in addition to equine bone: an immunohistochemical study in man. Implant Dent 2011 Oct;20(5):383-388.
  35. Alveolar ridge regeneration with equine spongy bone: a clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009 Jun;11(2):90-100.
  36. Guided bone regeneration of an atrophic mandible with a heterologous bone block. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2016 Mar;9(1):88-93.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.