The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2017 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Sealing Ability of Esthetic Post and Core Systems

Thamer Almohareb

Citation Information : Almohareb T. Sealing Ability of Esthetic Post and Core Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (7):627-632.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2096

Published Online: 00-07-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To review the literature on the sealing ability of esthetic post systems with different cementation techniques.

Background

An important factor for successful root canal treatment is the development of a coronal seal to the treated root canal system.

Review result

The current literature describes promising results using fiber posts with a dual-cure, self-etch resin cement system. However, none of the published results describe a post system or cementation technique that achieved a homogeneous and tight coronal seal.

Conclusion

Fiber post systems appear to be favorable alternatives to metallic or ceramic post systems. Furthermore, dual-cure, self-etch resin cement systems represent superior alternatives to other cement systems.

Clinical significance

The clinician should be aware of the differences between various post systems and different cement systems to select and apply the most appropriate post and cement in each clinical situation.

How to cite this article

Almohareb T. Sealing Ability of Esthetic Post and Core Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(7):627-632.


PDF Share
  1. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995 Jan;28(1):12-18.
  2. Endodontic failure caused by inadequate restorative procedures: review and treatment recommendations. J Prosthet Dent 2002 Jun;87(6):674-678.
  3. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence Int 2004 Sep;35(8):657-667.
  4. Lack of correlation between ex vivo apical dye penetration and presence of apical radiolucencies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006 Sep;102(3):e19-e23.
  5. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent 2001 Mar;85(3):284-291.
  6. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod 1998;24(11):703-708.
  7. Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems. J Endod 2003 Feb;29(2):125-131.
  8. Methodologies for assessment of apical and coronal leakage of endodontic filling materials: a critical review. J Oral Sci 2006 Sep;48(3):93-98.
  9. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results. Oper Dent 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):9-15.
  10. Periapical health related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings. Int Endod J 2002 Aug;35(8):680-689.
  11. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in root-canal-treated teeth restored by the post and core technique. Int Endod J 1997 Nov;30(6):361-368.
  12. Microleakage of posts used to restore endodontically treated teeth. J Endod Jul;21(7):376-379.
  13. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent 2002 Aug;15(4):279-289.
  14. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997;22(4):173-185.
  15. Conversion in different depths of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1982;40(3):179-192.
  16. Bacterial leakage versus dye leakage in obturated root canals. Int Endod J 1999 Sep;32(5):370-375.
  17. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth with different dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004 Aug;92(2):163-169.
  18. Microleakage of different dowel systems luted with resin cements. Eur J Prosthodont 2014 May;2(2):53.
  19. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007 Oct;98(4):270-276.
  20. Microleakage of teeth restored with different adhesive dowel systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2014 Jan;23(1):45-49.
  21. Microleakage in overflared root canals restored with different fiber reinforced dowels. Oper Dent 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):96-105.
  22. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with 3 different adhesive systems and 4 different fiber-reinforced posts. J Prosthet Dent 2012 Apr;107(4):239-251.
  23. Microleakage along glass-fibre posts cemented with three different materials after cyclic loading: a pilot study. Coll Antropol 2013 Jul;37(2):431-435.
  24. Microleakage of composite resin cores treated with various dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1991 Jul;66(1):24-29.
  25. Microleakage along Glassix glass fibre posts cemented with three different materials assessed using a fluid transport system. Int Endod J 2006 May;39(5):363-367.
  26. Effect of various post materials and resin luting cements on microleakage in endodontically treated root canals. J Adhes Sci Technol 2015;29(16):1651-1662.
  27. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater 2008 Jul;24(7):967-977.
  28. Microleakage evaluation of core buildup composite resins with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010 Mar;11(2):009-16.
  29. [New concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the Composipost (1)]. Chir Dent Fr 1990 Nov;60(540):131-141.
  30. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci 1996 Oct-Dec;104(5-6):605-611.
  31. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002 Dec;18(8):596-602.
  32. Bonding of restorative and veneering composite resin to some polymeric composites. Dent Mater 2001 Jan;17(1):80-86.
  33. A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont 1996 Dec;5(4):270-276.
  34. Benefits of a two-step cementation procedure for prefabricated fiber posts. J Adhes Dent 2010 Feb;12(1):55-62.
  35. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004;20(1):29-36.
  36. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J 2011 Jun;56 (Suppl 1):77-83.
  37. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts. J Endod 2005 Mar;31(3):209-211.
  38. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002 Apr;87(4):431-437.
  39. Effect of low-temperature-plasma surface treatment on the adhesion of ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene fibres. J Mater Sci 1993;28(18):4883-4891.
  40. Combined technique with polyethylene fibers and composite resins in restoration of traumatized anterior teeth. Dent Traumatol 2004 Jun;20(3):172-177.
  41. Effect of fiber architecture on flexural characteristics and fracture of fiber-reinforced dental composites. Dent Mater 2007 Aug;23(8):960-968.
  42. Retrospective assessment of 546 all-ceramic anterior and posterior crowns in a general practice. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(6):544-550.
  43. A preliminary consideration of the glass-ceramic dowel post and core. Int J Prosthodont 1989 Jan-Feb;2(1):51-55.
  44. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res 1989 Jan;23(1):45-61.
  45. New knowledge about zirconium-ceramic as a structural material in fixed prosthodontics. Acta Stomatol Croat 2015 Jun;49(2):137-144.
  46. Light transmission of posts and cores used for the anterior esthetic region. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004 Oct;24(5):462-469.
  47. Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dent Mater J 2010 May;29(3):233-245.
  48. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J 2003 Jul;195(1):43-48.
  49. The influence of pressure changes on the retentive force and coronal microleakage of different types of posts in endodontically treated teeth during simulated dives. Diving Hyperb Med 2016 Dec;46(4):247-252.
  50. Retention of dowels using a composite resin as a cementing medium. J Prosthet Dent 1982 Sep;48(3):292-296.
  51. Fiber posts: cementation techniques. Smile Dent J 2012;7(2):44-47.
  52. Self-adhesive resin cements. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010 Dec;22(6):412-419.
  53. Self-adhesive resin cements – chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011 Apr;38(4):295-314.
  54. Should resin cements be used for every cementation? J Am Dent Assoc 2007 Jun;138(6):817-819.
  55. ; de Rijl, W. Shear bond strength of empress to dentin using four resin cements. AADR Oral Presentation 886, 2006 Annual Meeting, Orlando.
  56. ; Simon, JF. Shear bond strengths of resin cements to dentin and ceramic. Poster, CEREC 20-year celebration in Vegas. Las Vegas, NV, October 14, 2006.
  57. An evaluation of the shear bond strength of four universal cements to five prosthodontics substrates [Internet]. Kerr University; [cited 2012 Sep 27]. Available from: http://www.kerrdental.com/index/kerrdental-cements-maxcemelite-3rdparty-2.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.