The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 10 ( 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effect of Er: YAG Laser, Sandblast and Several Types of Universal Bonding on Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramic to Composite Resin

Mahdi Akbarzadeh, Loghman R Sofi, Reza Fekrazad, Marjan Maleki

Keywords : Er: YAG Laser, Sandblasting, Shear bond strength, Universal bonding.

Citation Information : Akbarzadeh M, Sofi LR, Fekrazad R, Maleki M. Effect of Er: YAG Laser, Sandblast and Several Types of Universal Bonding on Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramic to Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (10):1246-1253.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2412

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser laser (Er: YAG laser), sandblast and several universal bonding on the shear bond strength of zirconia ceramic to composite resin. Materials and methods: In this experimental study, 96 Y-TZP disks were used. They were divided into six groups based on surface preparation: 1-Er: YAG laser + single bond universal/ 3M, 2-Er: YAG laser + all bond universal/bisco, 3-Er: YAG laser + G-premio bond/GC, 4-sandblast + single bond universal/3M, 5-sandblast + all bond universal/bisco, 6-sandblast + G-Premio bond/GC; in the next step, composite discs were cured on the surface of the zirconia discs and their shear bond strength was evaluated using a mechanical test machine (universal testing machine). Results: Two-way ANOVA showed that the surface preparation had a significant statistical effect on shear bond strength (p< 0.001). There was no association between these two variables with regards to the interaction of bonding and surface preparation (p = 0.064). Tukey's test showed that the shear bond strengths in the sandblast type group did not differ significantly between the groups according to the type of universal bonding, as well as in the Er: YAG laser treated group by type Universal bonding which was not significantly different between the groups of single bond universal and all bond universal, but there was a significant difference between the groups in terms of single bond universal and G-Premio, as well as all bond universal and G-Premio. Conclusion: Based on the results, the preparation of Er:YAG laser is a more appropriate method for increasing bond strength when compared with sandblasting, and among the universal bonding, G-Premio is also more suitable for this purpose. Clinical significance: The present data indicate that bond strength of laser preparation and G-Premio adhesive might be reliable for clinical application


PDF Share
  1. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 June;95(6):430-6.
  2. Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989 January;23(1):45-61.
  3. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered highpurity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 June;91(4):356-62.
  4. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. The shear bond strength between luting cements and zirconia ceramics after two pre-treatments. Oper Dent. 2005 June;30(3):382-8.
  5. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 September;80(3):280-301.
  6. Blatz MB. Adhesive cementation of high-strength ceramics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007 September 14;19(5):238-9.
  7. El-Shrkawy ZR, El-Hosary MM, Saleh O, Mandour MH. Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength, surface and microscopic structure of zirconia ceramic. FDJ. 2016 June;2(1):41-53.
  8. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater J. 2007 October;23(10):1276-82.
  9. Lucena-Martin C, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Navajas-Rodriguez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heattreated composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 November;86(5): 481-8.
  10. Armengol V, Laboux O, Weiss P, Jean A, Hamel H. Effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAP laser irradiation on the surface roughness and free surface energy of enamel and dentin: an in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2003 January;28(1):67-74.
  11. Trajtenberg CP, Pereira PN, Powers JM. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium:YAG laser. Am J Dent. 2004 October 1;17(5):331-6.
  12. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods. Oper Dent. 2006 February; 31(2):248-55.
  13. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2007 January;23(1):45-50.
  14. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ. Microstructure, composition, and etching topography of dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 April;15(2):159-67.
  15. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol. 2017 January;8(1):1-17.
  16. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 July;43(7):765-76.
  17. Arami S, Hasani Tabatabaei M, Namdar F, Safavi N, Chiniforush N. Shear Bond Strength of the Repair Composite Resin to Zirconia Ceramic by Different Surface Treatment. J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Autumn;5(4):171-5.
  18. Bona AD, Borba M, Benetti P, Cecchetti D. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a zirconiareinforced ceramic to composite resin. Braz Oral Res. 2007 March;21(1):10-5.
  19. Abd El-Ghany OS, Sherief AH. Zirconia based ceramics, some clinical and biological aspects: Review. FDJ. 2016 December;2(2):55-64.
  20. Akin H, Ozkurt Z, Kirmali O, Kazazoglu E, Ozdemir AK. Shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic after aluminum oxide sandblasting and various laser treatments. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Decembre; 29(12):797-802.
  21. Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Influence of surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 July;91(2):930-7.
  22. Yun JY, Ha SR, Lee JB, Kim SH. Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dent Mater. 2010 July;26(7): 650-8.
  23. Paranhos MP, Burnett LH, Jr., Magne P. Effect Of Nd:YAG laser and CO2 laser treatment on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. Quintessence Int. 2011 May;42(1): 79-89.
  24. Akin H, Tugut F, Akin GE, Guney U, Mutaf B. Effect of Er:YAG laser application on the shear bond strength and microleakage between resin cements and Y-TZP ceramics. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 January;27(2):333-8.
  25. Cavalcanti AN, Foxton RM, Watson TF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, Marchi GM. Bond strength of resin cements to a zirconia ceramic with different surface treatments. Oper Dent. 2009 May;34(3):280-7.
  26. Foxton RM, Cavalcanti AN, Nakajima M, Pilecki P, Sherriff M, Melo L, et al. Durability of resin cement bond to aluminium oxide and zirconia ceramics after air abrasion and laser treatment. J Prosthodont 2011 February;20(2): 84-92.
  27. Kasraei S, Rezaei-Soufi L, Heidari B, Vafaee F. Bond strength of resin cement to CO2 and Er: YAG laser-treated zirconia ceramic. Restor Dent Endod. 2014 November;39(4):296- 302.
  28. Poggio C, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Chiesa M, Scribante A. Influence of dentin pretreatment on bond strength of universal adhesives. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017 March;3(1):30-5.
  29. Isolan CP, Valente LL, Münchow EA, Basso GR, Pimentel AH, Schwantz JK, et al. Bond strength of a universal bonding agent and other contemporary dental adhesives applied on enamel, dentin, composite, and porcelain. Applied Adhesion Science. 2014 December;2(1):25.
  30. Suzuki S, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Sai K, Takimoto M, et al. Bond durability of universal adhesive to bovine enamel using self-etch mode. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 April;22(3):1113-1122.
  31. Jayasheel A, Niranjan N, Pamidi H, Suryakanth MB. Comparative Evaluation of shear Bond Strength of universal Dental Adhesives-An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 July;9(7):e892.
  32. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011 January;27(1):1-16.
  33. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011 January;27(1):17-28.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.