The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Prevalence of Extra Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Permanent Molars in a Saudi Subpopulation Utilizing Microcomputed Tomography

Najat M Farsi, Eman A El Ashiry

Keywords : In vitro study, Maxillary first molars, Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), Root canal orifices

Citation Information : Farsi NM, Ashiry EA. Prevalence of Extra Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Permanent Molars in a Saudi Subpopulation Utilizing Microcomputed Tomography. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (11):1312-1316.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2424

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-11-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To study the prevalence of additional root canal orifices of upper first permanent molars in Saudi subpopulation in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, utilizing micro-computed tomography X-ray (micro-CT). Materials and methods: One hundred extracted upper first permanent molars of Saudi patients were included in the study. Micro-CT was used to detect the prevalence of extra root canal orifices of the permanent upper first molars. Results: The evaluation of three-dimensional (3D) images of this study showed that of 100 upper permanent first molars scanned and analyzed, 10.53% had 6 pulp canal orifices, 35.09% had 5 pulp canal orifices, 47.37% had 4 pulp canal orifices and 7.01% had 3 pulp canal orifices. Conclusion: The current data showed the highest prevalence of 4 and 5 root canal orifices compared to 3 and 6 root canal orifices. Clinical significance: The knowledge of anatomic variations of teeth before starting root canal treatment can help dentists to detect and manage all root canals successfully.


PDF Share
  1. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod. 2006;32:813-821.
  2. Degerness RA, Bowles WR. Dimension, anatomy and morphology of the mesiobuccal root canal system in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2010;36:985-989.
  3. Baratto Filho F, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, de Campos EA, Abuabara A, Correr GM. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod. 2009;35:337-342.
  4. Villas-Boas MH, Bernardineli N, Cavenago BC, Marciano M, Del Carpio-Perochena A, de Moraes IG et al. Micro-computed tomography study of the internal anatomy of mesial root canals of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2011;37:1682-1686.
  5. Somma F, Cretella G, Carotenuto M, Pecci R, Bedini R, De Biasi M, Angerame D. Quality of thermoplasticized and single point root fillings assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2011;44:362-369.
  6. Stern S, Patel S, Foschi F, Sherriff M, Mannocci F. Changes in centering and shaping ability using three nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques analysed by micro-computed tomography (ƒÊCT). Int Endod J. 2012;45:514-523.
  7. Marciano MA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Cunha TV, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Garcia RB, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N, Moraes IG. Analysis of four gutta-percha techniques used to fill mesial root canals of mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2011;44:321-329.
  8. Metzger Z, Zary R, Cohen R, Teperovich E, Paque F. The quality of root canal preparation and root canal obturation in canals treated with rotary versus self-adjusting files: A three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2010;36:1569-1573.
  9. Vier-Pelisser FV, Dummer PM, Bryant S, Marca C, So MV, Figueiredo JA. The anatomy of the root canal system of threerooted maxillary premolars analysed using high-resolution computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2010;43:1122-1131.
  10. Domark JD, Hatton JF, Benison RP, Hildebolt CF. An ex vivo comparison of digital radiography and cone-beam and microcomputed tomography in the detection of the number of canals in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. J Endod. 2013;39:901-905.
  11. Peters OA, Paque F. Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with the self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod.2011;37:53-57.
  12. Pasqualini D, Alovisi M, Cemenasco A, Mancini L, Paolino DS, Bianchi CC, Roggia A, Scotti N, Berutti E. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of ProTaper Next and BioRaceshaping outcomes in maxillary first molar curved canals. J Endod. 2015;41:1706-1710.
  13. Shen Y, Cheung GSP. Methods and models to study nickel -titanium instruments. Endod Topics. 2013;29:18-41.
  14. Versiani MA, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. The anatomy of two-rooted mandibular canines determined using microcomputed tomography. International endodontic journal. 2011;44:682-687.
  15. Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Testarelli L, D'Ambrosio F, Pecci R, Bedini R. Present and future in the use of micro-CT scanner 3D analysis for the study of dental and root canal morphology. Annalidell'Istitutosuperiore di sanita. 2012;48:26-34.
  16. Roggendorf MJ, Legner M, Ebert J, Fillery E, Frankenberger R, Friedman S. Micro-CT evaluation of residual material in canalsfilled with Activ GP or Gutta Flow following removal with NiTi instruments. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:200-209.
  17. Marciano MA, Guimaraes BM, Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Cavenago BC, Garcia RB, Bernardineli N, Andrade FB, Moraes IG, Duarte MAH. Physical properties and interfacial adaptation of three epoxy resin-based sealers. Journal of endodontics. 2011;37:1417-1421.
  18. Yang G, Yuan G, Yun X, Zhou X, Liu B, Wu H. Effects of Two nickel-titanium instrument systems, Mtwo versus ProTaper universal, on root canal geometry assessed by micro. computed tomography. J Endod. 2011;37:1412-1416.
  19. Zheng QH, Wang Y, Zhou XD, Wang Q, Zheng GN, Huang DM. A cone.beam computed tomography study of maxillary first permanent molar root and canal morphology in a Chinese population. J Endod. 2010;36:1480-1484.
  20. Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK, Park W, Jeong JS, Lee Y et al. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone.beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:785- 791.
  21. Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone.beam computed tomography in a Korean population: Variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod. 2012;38:1063.1068.
  22. Burns RC. 8th ed. St Louis, Mo, USA: The Mosby Co; 2002. Access openings and tooth morphology: Cohen'spathways of pulp; pp 173-229.
  23. Fazeli SA, Fazeli SA. First molar caries in primary school children of a northern city of Iran. Pak Oral Dent J. 2005;25:93- 96.
  24. Das S, Warhadpande MM, Redij SA, Jibhkate NG, Sabir H. Frequency of second mesiobuccal canal in permanent maxillary first molars using the operating microscope and selective dentin removal: A clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6:74-78.
  25. Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Surendran S. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with eight root canal systems evaluated using cone.beam computed tomography scanning: A case report. J Endod. 2011;37:715-719.
  26. Shetty K, Yadav A, Babu VM. Endodontic management of maxillary first molar having five root canals with the aid of spiral computed tomography. Saudi Endod J. 2014;4: 149.53.
  27. Badole GP, Warhadpande MM, Shenoi PR, Lachure C, Badole SG. A rare root canal configuration of bilateral maxillary first molar with 7 root canals diagnosed using cone.beam computed tomographic scanning: A case report. J Endod. 2014;40:296.301.
  28. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics. 2005;10:3.29.
  29. Sasai H, Iwai H, Fujita D, Seto E, Izumi Y. The use of microcomputed tomography in the diagnosis of dental and oral disease in rabbits. BMC Vet Res. 2014 Sep 5;10:209.
  30. Mukhaimer RH. Evaluation of Root Canal Configuration of Mandibular First Molars in a Palestinian Population by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An Ex Vivo Study. IntSch Res Notices. 2014 Aug 13;2014:583621.
  31. Shen Y, Cheung GSP. Methods and models to study nickeltitanium instruments. Endod Topics.2013;29:18-41.
  32. Pasqualini D, Bianchi CC, Paolino DS, Mancini L, Cemenasco A, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Berutti E.Computed microtomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary Path File in maxillary first molars curved canals. Endod. 2012;38:389-393.
  33. Naseri M, Kangarlou A, Khavid A, Goodini M.Evaluation of the quality of four root canal obturation techniques using micro-computed tomography. Iran Endod J. 2013;8:89-93.
  34. Marceliano-Alves M, Alves FR, Mendes Dde M, Provenzano JC. Micro-computed tomography analysis of the root canal morphology of palatal roots of maxillary first molars. J Endod.2016;42:280-283.
  35. Selem LC, Li G, Niu L, Bergeron BE, Bortoluzzi EA, Chen JH, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Quality of obturation achieved by a non-gutta-percha-based root filling system in single-rooted canals. J Endod.2014;40:2003-2008.
  36. Ahmad IA, Al-Jadaa A. Three root canals in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars: case reports and literature review. J Endod. 2014;40:2087-2094.
  37. Al. Habboubi TM, Al. Wasi K. Maxillary first molars with six canals confirmed with the aid of cone.beam computed tomography. Saudi Endod J. 2016;3:136.140.
  38. Al. Fouzan KS, Ounis HF, Merdad K, Al. Hezaimi K. Incidence of canal systems in the mesio-buccal roots of maxillary first and second molars in Saudi Arabian population. Aust Endod J. 2013;39:98.101.
  39. Alrahabi M, Sohail Zafar M. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31:426.430.
  40. Al-Shehri S, Al-Nazhan S, Shoukry S, Al-Shwaimi E, Al-Sadhan R, Al-Shemmery B. Root and canal configuration of the maxillary first molar in a Saudi subpopulation: A conebeam computed tomography study. Saudi Endod J. 2017;7: 69-76.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.