The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Alveolar Osteitis: Patient\'s Compliance with Post-extraction Instructions Following Permanent Teeth Extraction

Ammar A Siddiqui, Mohammed K Alsaleh, Sarah S Alajlan, Nasser F Alateeq, Naif S Alamer, Hazza A Alhobeira, Saif Khan

Keywords : Alveolar Osteitis, Dry socket, Patient\'s compliance, post-extraction

Citation Information : A Siddiqui A, Alsaleh MK, Alajlan SS, Alateeq NF, Alamer NS, Alhobeira HA, Khan S. Alveolar Osteitis: Patient\'s Compliance with Post-extraction Instructions Following Permanent Teeth Extraction. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (12):1518-1525.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2459

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The study aims to evaluate the patients’ compliance with post-extraction instructions to prevent the development of alveolar osteitis and keep the health of the socket. Alveolar osteitis “Dry socket” is considered one of the most common complications after extraction. Materials and methods: Study was based on an observational cross-sectional design involving 201 subjects (individuals). The subjects were evaluated via a survey questionnaire and clinical examination after obtaining their verbal and written consent. The study questionnaire was divided into the following sections; section one records the demographic data about the subject while the second section focuses on self-assessment mainly regarding compliance with post-extraction instructions and pain. Results: A total number of patients included in the study was 201, 122 (60.7%) male and 79 (39.3%) female with an age of more than 18 years. No statistically significant association was reported between a medical condition and dry socket. Out of 201 patients came for clinical examination, 89 felt pain at the site of extraction at different period started from the day of extraction till the day of examination with various pain intensity. Females were the most to feel pain after tooth extraction with 78%. Regarding prevalence, 14 (7%) patients reported having dry socket and poor socket status. A statistically significant association of non-complying patients with the incidence of the dry socket was observed for a wide range of age (18 to 40 years) Conclusion: The study showed a high degree of association between the incidence of dry socket cases for patients with poor compliance with post-extraction instruction. A strong relation was observed between the patients who felt pain and their gender (females) Clinical significance: Based on the findings of the present study, we recommend the need to properly educate patients on the effect of compliance and the various complications and factors affecting the socket status after tooth extraction due to non-compliance.


PDF Share
  1. Younis MHA, Ra'ed O. Dry Socket: Frequency, Clinical Picture, and Risk Factors in a Palestinian Dental Teaching Center. Open Dentistry Journal. 2011;5:7-12.
  2. Bowe DC, Rogers S, Stassen LF. The management of dry socket/alveolar osteitis. Journal of the Irish Dental Association. 2011;57(6):305-310.
  3. Sweet J, Butler D. The relationship of smoking to localized osteitis. J Oral Surg. 1979;37(10):732-735.
  4. Garcia A, Grana P, Sampedro F, Diago M, Rey J. Does oral contraceptive use affect the incidence of complications after extraction of a mandibular third molar? British dental journal. 2003;194(8):453-455.
  5. MacGregor A. Aetiology of dry socket: a clinical investigation. British Journal of Oral Surgery. 1968;6(1):49-58.
  6. Akinbami BO, Godspower T. Dry Socket: Incidence, Clinical Features, and Predisposing Factors. International Journal of Dentistry. 2014;2014:796102.
  7. Nusair Y, Younis M. Prevalence, clinical picture, and risk factors of dry socket in a Jordanian dental teaching center. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8(3):53-63.
  8. Osunde O, Anyanechi C, Bassey G. Prevention of alveolar osteitis after third molar surgery: Comparative study of the effect of warm saline and chlorhexidine mouth rinses. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2017;20(4):470-473.
  9. Adebayo E, Dairo M. Patients compliance with instructions after oral surgery in Nigeria. Journal of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care. 2005;17(1):38-44.
  10. Assiry A, Ramalingam S, Amri A, Al-Mujaly A, Al-Elyani Y. Saudi Patients Compliance With the Antibiotic Course in Dentistry. Dentistry. 2017;7(431):2161-1122.1000431.
  11. Bunzel B, Laederach-Hofmann K. Noncompliance in organ transplantation: a review. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. 2000;112(10):423.
  12. Bunzel B, Laederach-Hofmann K. Solid organ transplantation: are there predictors for posttransplant noncompliance? A literature overview. Transplantation. 2000;70(5):711.
  13. Blum I. Contemporary views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and management: a critical review. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2002;31(3):309.
  14. Al Hindi M. Dry Socket Following Teeth Extraction: Effect of Excessive Socket Saline Irrigation. J Oral Health Dent Sci. 2017;1:105.
  15. Momeni H, Shahnaseri S, Hamzeheil Z. Evaluation of relative distribution and risk factors in patients with dry socket referring to Yazd dental clinics. Dental research journal. 2011;8(Suppl1):S84.
  16. Garcia A, Grana P, Sampedro F, Diago M, Rey J. Does oral contraceptive use affect the incidence of complications after extraction of a mandibular third molar? British dental journal. 2003;194(8):453.
  17. Heasman P, Jacobs D. A clinical investigation into the incidence of dry socket. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. 1984;22(2):115.
  18. Khorasani m. The prevalence and risk factors of dry socket in dental surgery clients following tooth extraction at qazvin faculty of dentistry. 2006.
  19. Birn H. Etiology and pathogenesis of fibrinolytic alveolitis (“dry socket”). International journal of oral surgery. 1973;2(5):211-263.
  20. Torres-Lagares D, Serrera-Figallo M, Romero-Ruíz M, Infante- Cossío P, García-Calderón M, Gutiérrez-Pérez J. Update on dry socket: a review of the literature. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2005;10(1):81.
  21. Lilly GE, Osbon DB, Rael EM, Samuels HS, Jones JC. Alveolar osteitis associated with mandibular third molar extractions. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1974;88(4):802-806.
  22. Nusair Y, Younis M. Prevalence, clinical picture, and risk factors of dry socket in a Jordanian dental teaching center. The journal of contemporary dental practice. 2007;8(3):53.
  23. Sweet J, Butler D. The relationship of smoking to localized osteitis. Journal of oral surgery (American Dental Association: 1965). 1979;37(10):732-735.
  24. Johnson WS, Blanton EE. An evaluation of 9-aminoacridine/ Gelfoam to reduce dry socket formation. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1988;66(2):167-170.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.