The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The Effect of Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Candida Albicans and Streptococcus Mutans on the Biofilm Formation on Prosthetic Materials

Manoj Shetty, Shagun Gulia, Vinaya Bhatt, Krishna Prasad D, Prateek Gupta

Keywords : Artificial saliva, Biofim, Candida albicans, Natural saliva, Prosthetic materials, Streptococcus mutans, Type II diabetes mellitus

Citation Information : Shetty M, Gulia S, Bhatt V, D KP, Gupta P. The Effect of Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Candida Albicans and Streptococcus Mutans on the Biofilm Formation on Prosthetic Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (12):1539-1546.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2462

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To investigate the biofilm formation on Prosthetic materials as affected by type II diabetes mellitus, Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans. Materials and methods: Two types of saliva, Natural saliva, and artificial saliva were collected and prepared respectively. The natural saliva was divided into diabetic and non-diabetic saliva. The Artificial saliva was further divided into two groups, one inoculated with Streptococcus mutans and the second with Candida albicans. The 150 samples of various prosthetic materials were prepared using nickel-chromium alloy, ceramic, soft liner, tooth molding powder; heat cured the acrylic resin. The samples were then immersed in natural saliva and artificial saliva and studied for biofilm formation. Results: D iabetic s aliva f ormed m ore b iofilm t han n ondiabetic saliva. Streptococcus mutans were able to form more biofilm than Candida albicans in artificial saliva on constitutive androstane receptor (hCAR) and spinal length (SL). In Diabetic saliva, there was a significant difference in the biofilm formation seen between MC and NCA (p < 0.05). No biofilm was formed on hCAR in Natural Saliva (Diabetic or non-diabetic). In Artificial saliva inoculated with Candida albicans and streptococcus mutans there is a significant difference in the biofilm formation in all the materials except NCA. Conclusion: Diabetic saliva has more potential to form biofilm than non-diabetic saliva. Also, Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans both can form a biofilm on materials used with the maximum formation on hCAR. Smoother materials formed less biofilm than rougher surfaces like hCAR, PCM, SL. Clinical significance: It is desirable for dental restorative materials to have a low susceptibility for accumulation and formation of biofilm as it may lead to pathologies such as dental caries, periodontal disease, peri-implantitis, etc. which are plaquerelated. The most commonly used materials in prosthodontics have been used in the study to establish a direct relationship with the formation of biofilm, this, in turn, helps us to take the right call in choosing a material for a patient with an already compromised systemic condition.


PDF Share
  1. Ramage G, Saville S, Thomas D, López-Ribot J. Candida Biofilms: An Update. Eukaryotic Cell. 2005;4(4):633-638.
  2. Douglas LJ. Medical importance of biofilms in Candida infections. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2002;19(3):139-143.
  3. Donlan RM. Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Ricrobial Rev. 2002;15:167-193.
  4. Bhat V, Sharma SM. Role of candida biofilms on denture stomatitis. J Ind Acad dent spec research. 2013;2(1):27-35.
  5. Nyvad B, Kilian M. Comparison of the initial streptococcal microflora on dental enamel in caries- active and in caries inactive individuals. Caries res.1990;24(4):267-272.
  6. Sashikumar R, Ranganathan K. Salivary glucose levels and oral candidal carriage in type II diabetics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(5):706-711.
  7. Sbordone L, Bortolaia C. Oral Microbial Biofilms And Plaque-Related Diseases: Microbial Communities And Their Role In The Shift From Oral Health To Disease Clinical Oral Investigations 2003;7(4):181-188.
  8. Volpato P, Claudia A. Candida prevelance in well controlled type II diabetes patients with denture stomatitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:726-733.
  9. Soysa NS. Diabetes mellitus as a contributory factor in oral candidosis. Diabetic Medicine. 2006;23(5):455-459.
  10. Morgan TD, Wilson M The effects of surface roughness and type of denture acrylic on biofilm formation by Streptococcus oralis in a constant depth film fermentor. J Appl Microbiol 2001;91(1):47-53.
  11. Bulad K, Taylor RL, Verran J, McCord JF. Colonization and penetration of denture soft lining materials by Candida albicans. Dent Mat 2004;20(2):167-175.
  12. Nikawa H, Jin C, Makihira S, Egusa H, Hamada T, Kumagai H. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on the surfaces of deteriorated soft denture lining materials caused by denture cleansers in vitro. J Oral Rehab 2003;30(3):243-250.
  13. Nikawa H, Yamamoto T, Hamada T, Rahardjo MB, Murata H. Commercial denture cleansers--cleansing efficacy against Candida albicans biofilm and compatibility with soft denture-lining materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8(5):434-444.
  14. Nikawa H, Chen J, Hamada T, Nishimura M, Polyzois G. Candida albicans colonization on thermal cycled maxillofacial polymeric materials in vitro. J Oral Rehab 2001;28(6): 526-533.
  15. Nikawa H, Hamada T, Yamamoto T, Kumagai H. Effects of salivary or serum pellicles on the C.albicans growth and biofilm formation on soft lining materialsin vitro. J Oral Rehab 1997; 24: 594-604.
  16. Pereira-Cenci T, Deng DM, Kraneveld EA, Manders EM, Del Bel Cury AA, Ten Cate JM, Crielaard W. The effect of Streptococcus mutans and Candida glabrata on Candida albicansbiofilms formed on different surfaces. Archives of Oral Biology. 2008; 53(8):755-764.
  17. Taylor R1, Maryan C, Verran J. Retention of oral microorganisms on cobalt chromium alloy and dental acrylic resin with different surface finishes. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(5):592-597
  18. Busscher HJ1, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm Formation on Dental Restorative and Implant Materials. J Dent Res. 2010;89(7):657-665.
  19. Steinberg D. Studying Plaque Biofilms on Various Dental Surfaces. Handbook of Bacterial Adhesion: 2000, pp 35
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.