The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Nano-zirconia-integrated Pressable Feldspathic and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics

Chengalvarayan Sasikala, N Gopi Chander

Citation Information : Sasikala C, Chander NG. Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Nano-zirconia-integrated Pressable Feldspathic and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (3):339-344.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2263

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 00-03-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare the flexural strength of nano-reinforced zirconia feldspathic porcelain, lithium disilicate ceramics, and zirconia.

Materials and methods

Ten bar-shaped specimens of computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) zirconia, reinforced feldspathic porcelain, and reinforced lithium disilicate were fabricated in accordance to International Organization for Standardization (ISO 6872; n = 10). Feldspathic porcelain and lithium disilicate ceramic specimens were reinforced with 5, 10, 15, and 20% of zirconia nanoparticles through a customized technique. The specimens were subjected to three-point flexural strength test using universal testing machine (UTM) and examined for crack propagation using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). One­way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test were used to analyze the data (p < 0.05).

Results

The flexural strength of feldsphatic porcelain increased with the increase in the concentration of zirconia particles. The mean flexural strength of 5, 10, 15, and 20% nano-zirconia-incorporated lithium disilicate was 93.8, 97.1, 100.6, and 100.8 MPa respectively, and was lower than the control group (221.7 MPa). A significant difference in the flexural strength was found with the incorporation of nano-zirconia particles.

Conclusion

The flexural strength of zirconia-integrated feldspathic porcelain increased and lithium disilicate ceramics decreased with the nano-zirconia reinforcement.

Clinical significance

The simplified approach of reinforcing feldspathic porcelain with zirconia nanoparticles can be adapted in clinical situations of higher masticatory forces.

How to cite this article

Sasikala C, Chander NG. Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Nano-zirconia-integrated Pressable Feldspathic and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(3):339-344.


  1. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996 Apr;7(2):134-143.
  2. From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater 2011 Jan;27(1):83-96.
  3. Performance of dental ceramics: challenges for improvements. J Dent Res 2011 Aug;90(8):937-952.
  4. Strength and fracture toughness of MgO-modified glass infiltrated alumina for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2002 May;18(3):216-220.
  5. Mechanical properties of commercial high strength ceramic core materials. Dent Mater 2004 Feb;20(2):207-212.
  6. Flexural strength and fracture toughness of dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2007 Aug;98(2):120-128.
  7. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1992 Jun;67(6):859-865.
  8. Phillip’s science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2003. pp. 655-710.
  9. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007 Nov;35(11):819-826.
  10. Reinforcement of porcelain crowns with silicone carbide fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1980 Jan;43(1):40-41.
  11. Effect of polymorphism of SiO2 addition on mechanical properties of feldspathic porcelains. Dent Mater J 2008 May;27(3):347-355.
  12. Mechanical properties of glass only porcelains prepared by the use of two feldspathic frits with different thermal properties. J Dent Res 2001 Aug;80(8):1758-1763.
  13. Crystallization and flexural strength optimization of fine-grained leucite glass-ceramics for dentistry. Dent Mater 2011 Nov;27(11):1153-1161.
  14. Emerging technology and techniques. Indian J Dent Res 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):106-107.
  15. Custom fabrication of reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic ingot. Indian J Dent 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):55-56.
  16. Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing. J Prosthet Dent 2009 Jan;101(1):20-28.
  17. Influence of powder/liquid mixing ratio on porosity and translucency of dental porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 2004 Feb;91(2):128-135.
  18. Composite ceramics reinforced with zirconia nanopowders. Adv Mater Res 2008 Jun;47-50:1059-1062.
  19. Improved performance of diatomite-based dental nanocomposite ceramics using layer-by-layer assembly. Int J Nanomed 2012;7:2153-2164.
  20. Improvement of strength parameters of a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic by dual-ion exchange. J Dent Res 2001 Jan;80(1):336-339.
  21. Effect of ion exchange on strength and slow crack growth of a dental porcelain. Dent Mater 2009 Jun;25(6):736-743.
  22. The influence of calcium fluoride on biaxial flexural strength of appatite-mullite glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2005 Sep;21(9):846-851.
  23. Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J Nanobiotechnol 2004 Apr;2(1):3.
  24. A study on the wear of enamel caused by monolithic zirconia and the subsequent phase transformation compared to two other ceramic systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2017 Jan-Mar;17(1):8-14.
  25. Quantitative phase analysis from X-ray diffraction in Y-TZP dental ceramics: a critical evaluation. J Dent 2014 Nov;42(11):1487-1494.
  26. The effect of spark plasma sintering on lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Dent Mater 2015 Oct;31(10):e226-e235.
  27. Comparison of reactive and non-reactive spark plasma sintering routes for the fabrication of monolithic and composite ultra-high temperature ceramics (UHTC) materials. Materials (Basel) 2013 Apr;6(5):1566-1583.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.