The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 5 ( 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of Tumor-associated Tissue Eosinophilia in Different Stages of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma using Special Stains: An in vitro Histopathological Study

S Ladke Vaibhav, P Lunawat Priya, C Kapse Sonam, Koshti Supriya, Yadav Garima, Shaikh Sabeer, Parag Juvale, Gitanjali Javir

Keywords : Eosinophilia, Oral squamous cell carcinoma, Prognosis, Stains, Tumor stroma, Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia

Citation Information : Vaibhav SL, Priya PL, Sonam CK, Supriya K, Garima Y, Sabeer S, Juvale P, Javir G. Evaluation of Tumor-associated Tissue Eosinophilia in Different Stages of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma using Special Stains: An in vitro Histopathological Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (5):579-586.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2302

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-05-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the tissue eosinophilia in different stages and grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and correlate its possible role as a prognosticator in primary OSCC using special stains like Congo red and carbol chromotrope. Materials and methods: Forty-five intraoral histopathologically proven cases of OSCC were selected (15 cases each of well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (WDSCC), moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (MDSCC), and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (PDSCC)). Three sections of 4 μm were taken for each case. All slides were stained using routine stain, i.e., hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and special stains, i.e., carbol chromotrope and Congo red respectively, for studying tissue eosinophils in all these groups. Histopathological evaluation was performed on paraffin sections for calculating the quantitative eosinophil distribution by two separate observers who were blinded to clinical and histopathological data. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) was calculated using the density method. Results: An increase in the degree of TATE from stage I to stage IV suggested that elevated tissue eosinophilia was seen with an increasing size of primary tumor. Also an increase in TATE was observed with an increasing grade of OSCC. Chromotrope stain was found to be a much better and more specific stain for eosinophils, and gave more accurate eosinophil count compared with H&E and Congo red. Conclusion: The findings of the present study highlight the significance of eosinophil counting and that it can be used as an additional morphological parameter in the grading of OSCC which can also be included in the biopsy report.


PDF Share
  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108.
  2. Bektaş-Kayhan K. Role of inflammation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Available from: www.intechopen.com
  3. Lowe D, Jorizzo J, Hutt MS. Tumour-associated eosinophilia: a review. J Clin Pathol 1981 Dec;34(12):1343-1348.
  4. Saraswathi TR, Nalinkumar S, Ranganathan K, Umadevi R, Elizabeth J. Eosinophils in health and disease: an overview. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2003;7(2):31-33.
  5. Hogan SP, Rosenberg HF, Moqbel R, Phipps S, Foster PS, Lacy P, Kay AB, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophils: biological properties and role in health and disease. Clin Exp Allergy 2008 May;38(5):709-750.
  6. Pereira MC, Oliveira DT, Kowalski LP. The role of eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein in oral cancer: a review. Arch Oral Biol 2011 Apr;56(4):353-358.
  7. Przewoski E. Ueber die locale eosinophilie beim krebs nebst Bemerkungen iiber die Bedeutung der eosinopbilen zellen im Allgemeinen. Centralbl f Allg Path u Path Anat 1896;5:177-191.
  8. Dorta RG, Landman G, Kowalski LP, Lauris JRP, Latorre MRDO, Oliveira DT. Tumour-associated tissue eosinophilia as a prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Histopathology 2002 Aug;41(2):152-157.
  9. Oliveira DT, Tjioe KC, Assao A, Sita Faustino SE, Lopes Carvalho A, Landman G, Kowalski LP. Tissue eosinophilia and its association with tumoral invasion of oral cancer. Int J Surg Pathol 2009 Jun;17(3):244-249.
  10. Thompson AC, Bradley PJ, Griffin NR. Tumor associated tissue eosinophilia and long-term prognosis for carcinoma of the larynx. Am J Surg 1994 Nov;168(5):469-471.
  11. Van Driel WJ, Hogendoorn PCW, Jansen FW, Zwinderman AH, Trimbos JB, Fleuren GJ. Tumor-associated eosinophilic infiltrate of cervical cancer is indicative for a less effective immune response. Hum Pathol 1996 Sep;27(9):904-911.
  12. Horiuchi K, Mishima K, Ohsawa M, Sugimura M, Aozasa K. Prognostic factors for well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity with emphasis on immunohistochemical evaluation. J Surg Oncol 1993 Jun;53(2):92-96.
  13. Tadbir AA, Ashraf MJ, Sardari Y. Prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilic infiltration in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Craniofac Surg 2009 Mar;20(2):287-289.
  14. Samoszuk M. Eosinophils and human cancer. Histol Histopathol 1997 Jul;12(3):807-812.
  15. Lorena CM, Dorta RG, Landman G, Nonogaki S, Oliveira DT. Morphometric analysis of the tumor associated tissue eosinophilia in the oral squamous cell carcinoma using different staining techniques. Histol Histopathol 2003 Jul;18(3):709-713.
  16. Debta P, Debta FM, Chaudhary M, Dani A. Evaluation of infiltration of immunological cells (tumour associated tissue eosinophils and mast cells) in oral squamous cell carcinoma by using special stains. Br J Med Med Res 2012 Jan-Mar;2(1):75-85.
  17. Debta P, Debta FM, Chaudhary M, Wadhwan V. Evaluation of prognostic significance of immunological cells (tissue eosinophil and mast cell) infiltration in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Sci Ther 2011;3(8):201-204.
  18. Payne RW, Hill RH. A routine method for staining eosinophils in sputum. J Clin Pathol 1963 Jul;16(4):387.
  19. Bancraft JD, Gamble M. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 346-347.
  20. Culling CFA, Allison RT, Barr WT. Cellular pathology technique. 4th ed. Butterworth and Co; 1985. pp. 460-461.
  21. Alkhabuli JO, High AS. Significance of eosinophil counting in tumor associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE). Oral Oncol 2006 Sep;42(8):849-850.
  22. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Chi A. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders;2002. pp. 356-366.
  23. Alrawi SJ, Tan D, Stoler DL, Dayton M, Anderson GR, Mojica P, Douglas W, Hicks W Jr, Rigual N, Loree T. Tissue eosinophilic infiltration: a useful marker for assessing stromal invasion, survival and locoregional recurrence in head and neck squamous neoplasia. Cancer J 2005 May-Jun;11(3):217-225.
  24. Underwood JCE. Lymphoreticular infiltration in human tumours: prognostic and biological implications: a review. Br J Cancer 1974 Dec;30(6):538-548.
  25. Loachim HL, Dorset BH, Paludi E. The immune response at the tumor site in lung carcinoma. Cancer (Phila) 1976 Dec;38(6):2296-2309.
  26. Sharma M, Sah P, Sharma SS, Radhakrishnan R. Molecular changes in invasive front of oral cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2013 May-Aug;17(2):240-247.
  27. Rakesh N, Devi Y, Majumdar K, Reddy SS, Agarwal K. Tumour associated tissue eosinophilia as a predictor of locoregional recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Exp Dent 2015 Feb;7(1):e1-e6.
  28. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2005. pp. 356-363.
  29. Lynch MA, Brightman VJ, Greenberg MS. Burkit's oral medicine diagnosis and treatment. 9th ed. Philadelphia (PA): J.B. Lippincott Company; 1994. pp. 204-205.
  30. Joshi P, Kaijkar M. A histochemical study of tissue eosinophilia in oral squamous cell carcinoma using Congo red staining. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013 Nov-Dec;10(6):784-789.
  31. King GN, Healy CM, Glover MT, Kwan JT, Williams DM, Leigh IM, Worthington HV, Thornhill MH. Increased prevalence of dysplastic and malignant lip lesions in renaltransplant recipients. N Engl J Med 1995 Apr;332:1052-1057.
  32. Peter CD, Shashidara R, Haragannavar VC, Samuel P, Sridhara SU. Assessment of tumor associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) in oral squamous cell carcinoma using carbol chromotrope stain. Int J Odontostomat 2015;9(1):91-95.
  33. Kargahi N, Razavi SM, Deyhimi P, Homayouni S. Comparative evaluation of eosinophils in normal mucosa, dysplastic mucosa and oral squamous cell carcinoma with hematoxylin- eosin, Congo red, and EMR1 immunohistochemical staining techniques. Electronic Physician 2015 Apr-Jun;7(2): 1019-1026.
  34. Wong DTW, Elovic A, Matossian K, Nagura N, McBride J, Chou MY, Gordon JR, Rand TH, Galli SJ, Weller PF. Eosinophils from patients with blood eosinophilia express transforming growth factor B-1. Blood 1991 Nov;78(10):2702-2707.
  35. Zini A, Czerninski R, Sgan-Cohen HD. Oral cancer over four decades: epidemiology, trends, histology, and survival by anatomic sites. J Oral Pathol Med 2010 Apr;39(4):299-305.
  36. Looi L-M. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A pathologic study of 422 primary and 138 metastatic tumors. Cancer 1987 Feb;59(3):466-470.
  37. Goldsmith MM, Cresson DH, Askin FB. Part II. The prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilia in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987 Apr;96(4):319-324.
  38. Goldsmith MM, Belchis DA, Cresson DH, Merritt WD III, Askin FB. The importance of the eosinophil in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992 Jan;106(1): 27-33.
  39. Pretlow TP, Keith EF, Cryar AK, Bartolucci AA, Pitts AM, Pretlow TG, Kimball PM, Boohaker EA. Eosinophil infiltration of human colonic carcinomas as a prognostic indicator. Cancer Res 1983 Jun;43(6):2997-3000.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.