The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 8 ( 2018 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

A Proposal of New Classification for Dental Implant Complications

Ilser Turkyilmaz

Keywords : Complication, Esthetics, Failure, Implant, Nerve injury, Success.

Citation Information : Turkyilmaz I. A Proposal of New Classification for Dental Implant Complications. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (8):1025-1033.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2375

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aims of this study are to review the available literature related to implant complications and propose a new classification method for dental implant complications. Materials and methods: Dental literature was reviewed via PubMed focusing on articles published in English, which included data regarding dental implants, complications, and classification from January 2000 to January 2018. The author, who has experience with implant placement and restorations for 15 years, and ten of his colleagues, formed a list of implant complications that they have encountered in their practices. Results: After 3,736 articles were found in the initial search, a total of 613 potentially relevant review articles were identified in the database. After the full-text analysis of 25 articles, only 6 review articles with complication classifications were utilized in this study. In addition, a clinically based classification named “Turkyilmaz\'s Classification of Implant Complications” including three categories was created. Types of complications in these three groups (Mild, Moderate, and Severe) were listed, and some of them were illustrated. Also, recommendations for clinicians were made on how to avoid these problems and/or overcome them. Conclusion: It has been suggested that categorical data regarding complications of dental implants are limited, and the new complication classification presented in this article may help clinicians identify and overcome commonly encountered implant complications. Clinical significance: For clinicians, it is important to know possible complications regarding dental implants. In this article, a group of dentists created and suggested a new classification for implant complications, which may help clinicians identify commonly encountered complications and how to handle them in the clinic.


PDF Share
  1. Jones JD, Partida MN, Turkyilmaz I. Dental implants in the older adult. Tex Dent J 2012 Jan;129(1):17-21.
  2. Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health 2008 Nov;8:32.
  3. Jimbo R, Albrektsson T. Long-term clinical success of minimally and moderately rough oral implants: a review of 71 studies with 5 years or more of follow-up. Implant Dent 2015 Feb;24(1):62-69.
  4. Turkyilmaz I, Company AM, McGlumphy EA. Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2010 Mar;27(1):3-10.
  5. Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2013 Apr;109(4):248-254.
  6. Turkyilmaz I, Tozum TF. 30-year outcomes of dental implants supporting mandibular fixed dental prostheses: a retrospective review of 4 cases. Implant Dent 2015 Oct;24(5): 620-624.
  7. Deliberador TM, Begnini GJ, Tomazinho F, Rezende CE, Florez FL, Leonardi DP. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization using the patient's extracted crown: 12-month follow-up. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2018 Mar;39(3):e18-e21.
  8. Turkyilmaz I, Shapiro V. Immediate provisional restoration of an implant placed in a fresh primary maxillary canine extraction socket: a case report. Gen Dent 2011 May-Jun; 59(3):e105-e109.
  9. Reyes A, Turkyilmaz I, Prihoda TJ. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2015 Apr;113(4):295-303.
  10. Chiang HS, Huang RY, Weng PW, Mau LP, Tsai YC, Chung MP, Chung CH, Yeh HW, Shieh YS, Cheng WC. Prominence of scientific publications towards peri-implant complications in implantology: a bibliometric analysis using the H-classics method. J Oral Rehabil 2018 Mar;45(3):240-249.
  11. Ravida A, Saleh MHA, Muriel MC, Maska B, Wang HL. Biological and technical complications of splinted or nonsplinted dental implants: a decision tree for selection. Implant Dent 2018 Feb;27(1):89-94.
  12. Park SH, Wang HL. Implant reversible complications: classification and treatments. Implant Dent 2005 Sep;14(3): 211-220.
  13. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003 Aug;90(2):121-132.
  14. Chang M, Chronopoulos V, Mattheos N. Impact of excessive occlusal load on successfully-osseointegrated dental implants: a literature review. J Investig Clin Dent 2013 Aug;4(3):142-150.
  15. Vahidi F, Pinto-Sinai G. Complications associated with implant-retained removable prostheses. Dent Clin North Am 2015 Jan;59(1):215-226.
  16. Sadid-Zadeh R, Kutkut A, Kim H. Prosthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2015 Jan;59(1):195-214.
  17. Al-Sabbagh M, Bhavsar I. Key local and surgical factors related to implant failure. Dent Clin North Am 2015 Jan;59(1):1-23.
  18. Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts. Implant Dent 2010 Feb;19(1):8-15.
  19. Lemos CA, de Souza Batista VE, Almeida DA, Santiago Júnior JF, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016 Apr;115(4):419-427.
  20. Wittneben JG, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions–a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014 Mar;29(Suppl):84-98.
  21. Chee WW, Duncan J, Afshar M, Moshaverinia A. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cementretained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method. J Prosthet Dent 2013 Apr;109(4):216-221.
  22. Rayyan MM, Makarem HA. A modified technique for preventing excess cement around implant supported restoration margins. J Prosthet Dent 2016 Dec;116(6):840-842.
  23. Kappel S, Eiffler C, Lorenzo-Bermejo J, Stober T, Rammelsberg P. Undetected residual cement on standard or individualized allceramic abutments with cemented zirconia single crowns— a prospective randomized pilot trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016 Sep;27(9):1065-1071.
  24. Wilson TG Jr. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 2009 Sep;80(9):1388-1392.
  25. Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 Nov-Dec;14(6):865-888.
  26. Gapski R, Neugeboren N, Pomeranz AZ, Reissner MW. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):943-946.
  27. Turkyilmaz I. Prosthetic rehabilitation of an edentulous maxilla with microstomia, limited interarch space, and malaligned implants: a clinical report. Tex Dent J 2012 Apr;129(4):389-395.
  28. Turkyilmaz I. Use of reciprocating saw for alveolar ridge reduction in the anterior mandible for immediate load implant-supported hybrid dentures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010 Jun;68(6):1334-1337.
  29. Pasciuta M, Grossmann Y, Finger IM. A prosthetic solution to restoring the edentulous mandible with limited interarch space using an implant-tissue-supported overdenture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2005 Feb;93(2):116-120.
  30. Hingsammer L, Watzek G, Pommer B. The influence of crownto- implant ratio on marginal bone levels around splinted short dental implants: a radiological and clincial short term analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017 Dec;19(6):1090-1098.
  31. Anitua E, Alkhraist MH, Piñas L, Begoña L, Orive G. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014 May-Jun;29(3): 682-689.
  32. Garaicoa-Pazmiño C, Suárez-López del Amo F, Monje A, Catena A, Ortega-Oller I, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Influence of crown/implant ratio on marginal bone loss: a systematic review. J Periodontol 2014 Sep;85(9):1214-1221.
  33. Marongiu N. Keys to achieving predictable single-unit implant esthetics in the smile zone. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2018 Mar;39(3):168-174.
  34. Turkyilmaz I. Immediate provisional restoration of implant placed using flapless surgery and ridge mapping. Case report. N Y State Dent J 2011 Apr;77(3):21-23.
  35. Martin WC, Pollini A, Morton D. The influence of restorative procedures on esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014 Mar;29(S uppl):142-154.
  36. Wheeler SL. Implant complications in the esthetic zone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007 Jul;65(7 Suppl 1):93-102.
  37. Turkyilmaz I. Management of a malpositioned implant using custom abutment and screw-retained fixed dental prosthesis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014 May;15(3):381-384.
  38. Akkas I, Toptas O, Akpinar YZ, Ozan F. Segmental alveolar osteotomy by palatal approach to correct excessive angulated dental implants in anterior and posterior maxilla. J Clin Diagn Res 2015 Apr;9(4):ZD03-ZD05.
  39. Shavit I, Juodzbalys G. Inferior alveolar nerve injuries following implant placement—importance of early diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2014 Oct-Dec;5(4):e2.
  40. Alhassani AA, AlGhamdi AS. Inferior alveolar nerve injury in implant dentistry: diagnosis, causes, prevention, and management. J Oral Implantol 2010 Jun;36(5):401-407.
  41. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G, Sidlauskas A, Galindo- Moreno P. Inferior alveolar nerve injury associated with implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013 Feb;24(2): 183-190.
  42. Kim YT, Pang KM, Jung HJ, Kim SM, Kim MJ, Lee JH. Clinical outcome of conservative treatment of injured inferior alveolar nerve during dental implant placement. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013 Jun;39(3):127-133.
  43. Kaya Y, Sarikcioglu L. Sir Herbert Seddon (1903-1977) and his classification scheme for peripheral nerve injury. Childs Nerv Syst 2015 Feb;31(2):177-180.
  44. Niamtu J 3rd. Near-fatal airway obstruction after routine implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001 Dec;92(6):597-600.
  45. Pigadas N, Simoes P, Tuffin JR. Massive sublingual haematoma following osseo-integrated implant placement in the anterior mandible. Br Dent J 2009 Jan;206(2):67-68.
  46. Dubois L, de Lange J, Baas E, Van Ingen J. Excessive bleeding in the floor of the mouth after endosseus implant placement: a report of two cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010 Apr;39(4):412-415.
  47. Budihardja AS, Pytlik C, Haarmann S, Holzle F. Hemorrhage in the floor of the mouth after second-stage surgery: case report. Implant Dent 2006 Jun;15(2):148-152.
  48. Loukas M, Kinsella CR Jr, Kapos T, Tubbs RS, Ramachandra S. Anatomical variation in arterial supply of the mandible with special regard to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008 Apr;37(4):367-371.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.