The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 10 ( October, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Oral Health Behavior and Factors Influencing the Selection of Oral Hygiene Products among the Adolescent Tobacco Consumers in Jharkhand

Virendra K Prajapati

Keywords : Adolescents, Interdental aids, Tobacco, Toothbrush, Toothpaste

Citation Information : Prajapati VK. Oral Health Behavior and Factors Influencing the Selection of Oral Hygiene Products among the Adolescent Tobacco Consumers in Jharkhand. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (10):1200-1205.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2660

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-10-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To identify the oral health behavior and factors influencing the selection of oral hygiene products by the adolescent tobacco consumers in Ranchi district, Jharkhand. This study will also attempt to identify the factors related to the selection of toothbrushes for oral hygiene maintenance. Materials and methods: A total of 800 adolescent tobacco consumers were selected from Ranchi district. A self-administered questionnaire collected information on the oral health behavior and factors influencing the selection of oral cleansing aids. Logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: Toothbrush (83.0%) and toothpaste (78.0%) were the most common oral cleansing aids. Media played an important role in the selection of toothbrushes and toothpaste. The dental visit (15.0%) for preventive dental care was reported to be less. The individuals belonging to upper class (OR = 2.8, p value < 0.001*), of nontribal origin (OR = 3.21, p value < 0.001*, and residing in urban areas (OR = 5.6, p value < 0.0001*) were more likely to use a toothbrush. Conclusion: The consumption of tobacco should be discouraged. Promotion of oral cleansing aids and interdental aids should be carried out using support from media. Clinical significance: The oral health behavior of adolescents needs to be improved. The adolescents should be promoted to quit tobacco, and education and counseling should be provided to them for the oral health promotion. Regular dental check-up for preventive care should be encouraged.


PDF Share
  1. Mohan R, Venkatanarasu B, et al. Assessment of oral health status and dental treatment needs among 12- and 15-year-old school-going children of fisherman community residing at East Coast Road, Chennai: A cross-sectional study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11(2):S385–S392. DOI: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_42_19.
  2. Godha S, Dasar PL, et al. Oral Health: A Window to your Overall Health. Int J Oral Health Med Res 2015;2(3):105–108.
  3. Centre for diseases control (CDC). The Power of Prevention: Chronic disease. The public health challenge of the 21st century. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 2009; 1–18.
  4. Zeng J, Tang Y, et al. Alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, betel quid chewing and oral health associations with hypo pharyngeal cancer among men in Central South China: a case-control study. Cancer Manag Res 2019;11:6353–6364. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR. S203439.
  5. Holliday RS, Campbell J, et al. Effect of nicotine on human gingival, periodontal ligament and oral epithelial cells. A systematic review of the literature. J Dent 2019;86:81–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.030.
  6. Sen N, Bathija P, et al. Caries risk assessment using Cariogram model among smokeless tobacco users in India. Med Pharm Rep 2019;92(2):165–171. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-978.
  7. Petersen PE, Kwan S. Evaluation of community-based oral health promotion and oral disease prevention – WHO recommendations for improved evidence in public health practice. Community Dent Health 2004;21(4):319–329.
  8. Ainamo J, Parviainen K. Occurrence of plaque, gingivitis and caries as related to self reported frequency of toothbrushing in fluoride areas in Finland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979;7(3):142–146. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1979.tb01202.x.
  9. Creeth JE, Kelly SA, et al. Effect of tooth brushing duration and dentifrice quantity on enamel remineralisation: An in situ randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2016;55:61–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016. 10.003.
  10. Schlueter N, Klimek J, et al. Relationship between plaque score and video-monitored brushing performance after repeated instruction–a controlled, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17(2): 659–667. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0744-y.
  11. Umanah AU, Braimoh OB. Oral hygiene practices and factors influencing the choice of oral hygiene materials among undergraduate students at the University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. J Dent Allied Sci 2017;6:3–7. DOI: 10.4103/2277-4696. 205440.
  12. Paik DI, Moon HS, et al. Knowledge of and practices related to caries prevention among Koreans. J Public Health Dent 1994;54(4):205–210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1994.tb01216.x.
  13. Christen AG. The impact of tobacco use and cessation on oral and dental diseases and conditions. Am J Med 1992;93(1A):S25–S31. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90624-K.
  14. Rad M, Kakoie S, et al. Effect of long-term smoking on whole-mouth salivary flow rate and oral health. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2010;4(4):110–114. DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2010.028.
  15. Sangkheaw S. Effects of Smoking on periodontal tissues and halitosis. J Dent Assoc Thai 2007;57(5):275–284.
  16. World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys, Basic Methods, World Health Organization. 4th ed., Geneva, Switzerland: AITBS Publishers; 1999.
  17. Sharda A, Sharda J. Factors influencing choice of oral hygiene products used among the population of Udaipur, India. International Journal of Dental Clinics 2010;2(2):7–12.
  18. Bairwa M, Rajput M, et al. Modified kuppuswamy's socioeconomic scale: social researcher should include updated income criteria, 2012. Indian J Community Med 2013;38(3):185–186. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.116358.
  19. Logaranjani A, Mahendra J, et al. Influence of media in the choice of oral hygiene products used among the population of Maduravoyal, Chennai, India. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9(10):ZC06–ZC08. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14552.6562.
  20. Durrani F, Rahman F, et al. Oral hygiene practices and knowledge among residents of the trans-varuna region (India): A hospital-based study. 2018;16(2):154–159.
  21. Hoover JN, Singer DL, et al. Clinical evaluation of a light energy conversion toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19(6):434. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00674.x.
  22. Kumar S, Acharya S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for dental erosion among 11- to 14-year-old school children in South India. J Oral Sci 2013;55(4):329–336. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.55.329.
  23. Goryawala SN, Chavda PK, et al. A survey on oral hygiene methods practiced by patients attending dentistry department at a tertiary care Hospital from Central Gujarat. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016;6(2):115–119. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.178750.
  24. Jiang H, Petersen PE, et al. Self assessed dental health, oral health practices, and general health behaviors in Chinese urban adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63(3):343–352. DOI: 10.1080/00016350500216982.
  25. Joshi CP, Patil AG, et al. Comparative evaluation of cemental abrasion caused by soft and medium bristle hardness toothbrushes at three predetermined toothbrushing forces: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Perodontal 2017;21(1):10–15. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_118_17.
  26. Wilkins Esther M. Clinical practice of the Dental Hygienist, 3rd ed., Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1999. pp. 277–355.
  27. Poyato-Ferrera M, Segura-Egea JJ, et al. Comparison of modified Bass technique with normal toothbrushing practices for efficacy in supragingival plaque removal. Int J Dent Hyg 2003;1(2):110–114. DOI: 10.1034/j.1601-5037.2003.00018.x.
  28. Jafer M, Patil S, et al. Chemical plaque control strategies in the prevention of biofilm-associated oral diseases. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(4):337–343. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1851.
  29. Bouwsma OJ, Yost KG, et al. Comparison of a chlorhexidine rinse and a wooden interdental cleaner in reducing interdental gingivitis. Am J Dent 1992;5(3):143–146.
  30. Niaz K, Maqbool F, et al. Smokeless tobacco (paan and gutkha) consumption, prevalence, and contribution to oral cancer. Epidemiol Health 2017;39:e2017009. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2017009.
  31. Muthukrishnan A, Warnakulasuriya S. Oral health consequences of smokeless tobacco use. Indian J Med Res 2018;148(1):35–40. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1793_17.
  32. Gupta B, Bray F, et al. Associations between oral hygiene habits, diet, tobacco and alcohol and risk of oral cancer: A case-control study from India. Cancer Epidemiol 2017;51:7–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.09.003.
  33. Dilip CL. Health status, treatment requirements, knowledge and attitude towards oral health of police recruits in Karnataka. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry 2005;5(5):20–34.
  34. Singh S. Effectiveness of advertisement on toothpaste product: a case study in Jhajjar district. International Journal of Applied Research 2017;3(1):403–405.
  35. Kote S, Dadu M, et al. Knowledge, attitude and behavior for choosing oral hygiene aids among Students of Management Institutes, Ghaziabad, India. West Indian Med J 2013;62(8):758–763.
  36. Okunseri C, Chattopadhyay A, et al. Pilot survey of oral health-related quality of life: a cross sectional study of adults in Benin City, EdoState, Nigeria. BMC Oral Health 2005;5:7. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-5-7.
  37. Kumar S, Debnath N, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in Indian Population. Adv Prev Med 2015;2015:208519. DOI: 10.1155/2015/208519.
  38. Al-lafi T, Ababneh H. The effect of the extract of the Miswak used in Jordon and the Middle East on oral bacteria. Int Dent Journal 1995;45(3):218–222.
  39. Chawla HS. A new natural source for topical fluoride. J Indian Dent Assoc 1983;55(10):419–422.
  40. Singh A, Bharathi MP, et al. Oral health status and practices of 5 and 12 year old Indian tribal children. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011 Spring;35(3):325–330. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.35.3.c8063171438k4362.
  41. Malik AS, Shaukat MS, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of chewing stick and Toothbrush: A Randomized Clinical Trial. N Am J Med Sci 2014;6(7):333–337. DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.136916.
  42. Bhambal AB, Kothari SK, et al. Comparative effect of neem stick and toothbrush on plaque removal and gingival health - A clinical trial. J Adv Oral 2011;2(3):51–56. DOI: 10.1177/2229411220110322.
  43. Kaur A, Gupta N, et al. An epidemiological study to determine the prevalence and risk assessment of gingivitis in 5–12 and 15-year-old children of rural and urban area of Panchkula (Haryana). Indian J Dent Res 2014;25(3):294–299. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.138310.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.