The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effect of Surface Pretreatment and Thermal Activation of Silane Coupling Agent on Bond Strength of Fiber Posts to Resin Cement

CH Archana, S Murali Krishna Raju, Sarjeev S Yadhav, Sita RK Manthena, Prathuri R Teja

Keywords : Fiber post, Sandblasting, Shear bond strength, Silanization, Thermal activation

Citation Information : Archana C, Raju SM, Yadhav SS, Manthena SR, Teja PR. Effect of Surface Pretreatment and Thermal Activation of Silane Coupling Agent on Bond Strength of Fiber Posts to Resin Cement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (11):1293-1296.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2687

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-10-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction: For the restoration of grossly decayed root canal treated teeth, posts are used frequently to retain core for the definitive restoration. Therefore, it is necessary to create adequate adhesion at the post–root-cement interface for long-term performance of a post retained restoration. Aim: To establish the outcome of surface pretreatments such as silanization, sandblasting, and silanization followed by thermal activation of fiber posts on bonding with a dual-cured adhesive resin-based cement. Materials and methods: Eighty radiopaque, No #2 glass fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts (Hi-Rem Posts, Overfibers, Switzerland), posts were wiped with alcohol (surgical spirit, 90% alcohol) for 5 seconds in a single stroke. A cylindrical plastic cap of diameter 10 mm and length of 15 mm, which is closed on one side, was selected. This was duplicated to form molds and fiber posts embedded perpendicularly in the polyester resin, and samples were made. Samples were randomly distributed into four groups based on the pretreatment done and each group contains 20 samples, group I—(control), group II—(silanization), group III—(sandblasting), and group IV—(thermal treatment of silane). After surface treatment, exposed post surface was uniformly coated with dual-cured resin cement. Cement was cured for 40 seconds with a halogen lamp. The samples are subjected to load in a universal testing machine (UTM) at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minutes to evaluate the bonding failure at the interface. Results: Group IV resulted in the highest bond strength values followed by group III. Group II showed a comparatively higher value than group I but less than groups III and IV. Conclusion: Surface treatment procedure, on fiber post by silanization and sandblasting significantly improved adhesion between post and luting cement interface. Clinical significance: The surface pretreatment, such as sandblasting, silanization, thermal activation of silane coupling agents significantly improved, the retention of the post within in the root canal system.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Choi Y, Pae A, Park E-J, et al. The effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts on adhesion of a resin-based luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:362–368. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60078-9.
  2. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de reconstitution corono-adiculaire: Le Composipost (1). Le Chirurgien-Dentiste de France 1990;60:131–141.
  3. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al. A Simple etching technique for improving the retention of fiber posts to resin composites. J Endod 2006;32:44–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.005.
  4. Machado AC, Vilela ALR, Souza PG, et al. Critical analysis of fiber post surface treatment: a review. Biosci J 2014;30(3):914–924.
  5. Sultan SE, Korsiel AM, Kamel MS, et al. Effect of different surface treatments of luted Fiber posts on push out bond strength to root dentin. Tanta Dent J 2013; 116–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.tdj.2013.11.003.
  6. Heydecke G, Mathilde C, Peters J. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: A systematic review. Prosthet Dent 2002;87:380–386. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.123848.
  7. Frazer RQ, Kovarik RE, Chance KB, et al. Removal time of fiber posts versus titanium posts. Am J Dent 2008;21:175–178.
  8. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:39–44.
  9. Kalkan M, Usumez A, Ozturk A, et al. Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:41e–46e. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.005.
  10. Ferreira EA, Souza-Gabriel AE, Silva-Sousa YT, et al. Shear bond strength and ultra-structural interface analysis of different adhesive systems to bleached dentin. Microsc Res Tech 2011;74:244–245. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20895.
  11. Lastumaki T, Lassila L, Vallittu P. The semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix of fiber-reinforced composite and its effect on the surface adhesive properties. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:80–83. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025044623421.
  12. Valandro LF, Yoshiga S, de Melo RM, et al. Microtensile bond strength between a quartz fiber post and a resin cement: effect of post surface conditioning. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:105–111.
  13. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, et al. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:153–162.
  14. Clavijo, VG, Reis, JM, Kabbach, W, et al. Fracture strength of flared bovine roots restored with different intra radicular posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:574–578. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000600007.
  15. Leitune VC, Collares FM, Werner Samuel SM. Influence of chlorhexidine application at longitudinal push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:e77–e81. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.046.
  16. D'Arcangelo C, D'Amario M, Vadini M, et al. Influence of surface treatments on the flexural properties of fibre posts. J Endod 2007;33:864–867. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.004.
  17. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, et al. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores:microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization. Dent Mater 2005;21:437–444. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.012.
  18. Kim HD, Lee JH, Ahn KM, et al. Effect of silane activation on shear bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite post to resin cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:104–109. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.104.
  19. Moraes AP, Sarkis-Onofre R, Moraes RR, et al. Can silanization increase the retention of glass-fiber posts? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent 2015;40:567–580. DOI: 10.2341/14-330-O.
  20. Dietschi D, Ardu S, Rossier-Gerber A, et al. Adaptation of adhesive post and cores to dentin after in vitro occlusal loading: Evaluation of post material influence. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:409–419.
  21. Shafiei F, Saadat M, Jowkar Z. Effect of laser heat treatment on Pull-out bond strength of fiber posts treated with different silanes. J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e413–e418. DOI: 10.4317/jced.54145.
  22. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio R, et al. Effect of temperature on the silane coupling agents when bonding core resin to quartz fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006;22:1024–1028. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.024.
  23. Silva FP, Faria-E-Silva AL, Moraes RR, et al. Effect of thermally deposited siloxane-methacrylate coating on bonding to glass fibre posts. Int Endod J 2018;51:79–85. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12786.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.