The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of Penetration Depth and Microleakage of Resin Infiltrant and Conventional Sealant in Pits and Fissures of Permanent Teeth In Vitro

Amani Ahmad Al Tuwirqi, Ahmad Mohammad Alshammari, Osama Mahmood Felemban, Najat M Ali Farsi

Keywords : Fissure sealant, ICON, Microleakage, Penetration

Citation Information : Al Tuwirqi AA, Alshammari AM, Felemban OM, Farsi NM. Comparison of Penetration Depth and Microleakage of Resin Infiltrant and Conventional Sealant in Pits and Fissures of Permanent Teeth In Vitro. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (11):1339-1344.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2715

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-11-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To assess the penetration and microleakage of a resin infiltrant for the prevention of noncavitated white lesion progression in the fissure system of permanent teeth and compare it to a conventional sealant. Materials and methods: Sixty extracted permanent teeth with artificially produced noncavitated white lesions were randomly distributed according to the restorative material into group I (experimental) which received ICON resin infiltration, and group II (control) which received Helioseal F fissure sealant. For the penetration test, restorative materials were mixed with a fluorescent dye (eosin H) before light curing; roots were then amputated, and three buccopalatal microscopic sections were obtained from each tooth. These were dipped in 0.001 mg of ethanolic sodium fluorescence solution. Material penetration depth was assessed through confocal microscopy. Thirty teeth (15 from each group) underwent a microleakage test. Teeth were thermocycled, and then immersed in 50% silver nitrate (AgNO3) solution for 3 hours. Microleakage was evaluated using X-ray microtomography (micro-CT); AgNO3 presence between the material and the tooth surface indicated microleakage. Results: The mean material penetration value in teeth treated with ICON (104.8571 ± 7.63360 μm) was significantly higher than that in teeth treated with Helioseal F (5.3158 ± 3.83825 μm) (p < 0.001). The mean microleakage value in demineralized enamel treated with Helioseal F (0.2238 ± 0.12561) was significantly greater than that in demineralized enamel treated with ICON (0.0119 ± 0.0097) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: ICON displayed more penetration and less microleakage than Helioseal F in pits and fissures of permanent teeth. Clinical significance: Resin infiltrant showed superior retention and can provide a good alternative for adhesives and fissure sealants.


PDF Share
  1. Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V, et al. Trends in oral health status: united States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Vital and health statistics. series 11. Data Natl health Surv 2007(248):1–92.
  2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Oral health in America: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health; 2000. NIH Publication no. 00-4713 2014. Available from: https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/NNBBJT.pdf.
  3. Khan SQ, Khan NB, ArRejaie AS. Dental caries. A meta-analysis on a Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2013;34(7):744–749.
  4. Al Agili DE. A systematic review of population-based dental caries studies among children in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2013;25(1):3–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.10.002.
  5. Marthaler TM. Changes in dental caries 1953–2003. Caries Res 2004;38(3):173–181. DOI: 10.1159/000077752.
  6. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, et al. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129(1):55–66. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0022.
  7. Simonsen RJ. Sealants and caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144(7): 767–768. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0182.
  8. Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, et al. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study. J Dent 2014;42(2):149–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.015.
  9. Jodkowska E. Efficacy of pit and fissure sealing: long-term clinical observations. Quintessence Int 2008;39(7):593–602.
  10. Paris S, Lausch J, Selje T, et al. Comparison of sealant and infiltrant penetration into pit and fissure caries lesions in vitro. J Dent 2014;42(4):432–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.006.
  11. Arslan S, Lipski L, Dubbs K, et al. Effects of different resin sealing therapies on nanoleakage within artificial non-cavitated enamel lesions. Dent Mater J 2018;37(6):981–987. DOI: 10.4012/dmj. 2017-027.
  12. Corry A, Millett D, Creanor S, et al. Effect of fluoride exposure on cariostatic potential of orthodontic bonding agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Orthod 2003;30(4):323–329. DOI: 10.1093/ortho/30.4.323.
  13. Ismail A, Sohn W, Tellez M, et al. The international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35(3):170–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x.
  14. Paris S, Bitter K, Renz H, et al. Validation of two dual fluorescence techniques for confocal microscopic visualization of resin penetration into enamel caries lesions. Microsc Res Tech 2009;72(7):489–494. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20701.
  15. Hiremath S. Textbook of preventive and community dentistry. India: Elsevier; 2011.
  16. Baygin O, Korkmaz FM, Tüzüner T, et al. The effect of different enamel surface treatments on the microleakage of fissure sealants. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27(1):153–160. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-011- 0918-x.
  17. Simonsen R. A review of the clinical application and performance of pit and fissure sealants. Aust Dent J 2011;56:45–58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01295.x.
  18. Theuns H, Van Dijk J, Jongebloed W, et al. The mineral content of human enamel studied by polarizing microscopy, microradiography and scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 1983;28(9):797–803. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(83)90035-3.
  19. Wilson PR, Beynon AD. Mineralization differences between human deciduous and permanent enamel measured by quantitative microradiography. Arch Oral Biol 1989;34(2):85–88. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(89)90130-1.
  20. Fan P, Seluk L, O'brien W. Penetrativity of sealants: I. J Dent Res 1975;54(2):262–264.
  21. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003;24(4):655–665. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00380-0.
  22. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Kielbassa AM. Surface layer erosion of natural caries lesions with phosphoric and hydrochloric acid gels in preparation for resin infiltration. Caries Res 2007;41:223–230. DOI: 10.1159/000099323.
  23. Soviero V, Paris S, Leal S, et al. Ex vivo evaluation of caries infiltration after different application times in primary molars. Caries Res 2013;47(2):110–116. DOI: 10.1159/000345065.
  24. Lausch J, Paris S, Selje T, et al. Resin infiltration of fissure caries with various techniques of pretreatment in vitro. Caries Res 2015;49(1): 50–55. DOI: 10.1159/000366082. Available from: https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/366082.
  25. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of thermocycling regimens on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2002;18(3): 189–196. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00081-1.
  26. Asaka Y, Amano S, Rikuta A, et al. Influence of thermal cycling on dentin bond strengths of single-step self-etch adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2007;32(1):73–78. DOI: 10.2341/06-21.
  27. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater 2005;21(11):999–1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.005.
  28. Douglas W, Fields R, Fundingsland J. A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. J Dent 1989;17(4):184–188. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(89)90072-9.
  29. Tulunoglu O, Tulunoglu I, Antonson S, et al. Effectiveness of an infiltrant on sealing of composite restoration margins with/without artificial caries. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(6):717–725. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1605.
  30. Espigares J, Hayashi J, Shimada Y, et al. Enamel margins resealing by low-viscosity resin infiltration. Dent Mater J 2018;37(2):350–357. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2017-153.
  31. Kielbassa AM, Ulrich I, Schmidl R, et al. Resin infiltration of deproteinised natural occlusal subsurface lesions improves initial quality of fissure sealing. Int J Oral Sci 2017;9(2):117. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2017.15.
  32. Anauate-Netto C, Neto BL, Amore R, et al. Caries progression in non-cavitated fissures after infiltrant application: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25(4): 442–454. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0633.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.