The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Applicability of the Existence of Golden Standard and Golden Percentage in the Population of Jaipur, Rajasthan, India: A Comparative Study

Zuber A Naqvi, Amit Gupta, Karamdeep S Ahluwalia

Keywords : Digital caliper, Golden percentage, Golden standard, Grid, Perceived width

Citation Information : Naqvi ZA, Gupta A, Ahluwalia KS. Applicability of the Existence of Golden Standard and Golden Percentage in the Population of Jaipur, Rajasthan, India: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (12):1456-1460.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2721

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: An evaluation for the existence of the golden percentage and golden standard in Jaipur population: a comparative study. Materials and methods: Sample includes a total of 300 dentulous casts of participants including 150 males and 150 females. The cast belongs to the students, patients, and their attendants of Jaipur origin by birth who visited the Jaipur Dental College and Hospital. The width and height of maxillary teeth were measured by using a digital caliper. A grid was used to measure apparent widths of teeth. Student\'s t test was used to analyze the data using SPSS for Windows software (version 21) at the level of significance p < 0.05. Results: The mean and standard deviation (SD) for the golden percentage of right and left central incisors, right and left lateral incisors, and for right and left canines was found to be statistically significant from the ideal golden percentage (p < 0.05). The difference between mean and SD of the golden standard for right and left central incisors from the standard (80%) was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The golden percentage and golden standard did not exist in Jaipur population. Clinical significance: The result of this study shows deviation from the ideal golden percentage and golden standard for Jaipur population which can be used clinically as a guideline for esthetic results.


PDF Share
  1. Carlsson GE, Johansson A, Johansson AK, et al. Attitudes toward dental appearance in 50- and 60-year old subjects living in Sweden. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20(1):46–55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00148.x.
  2. Park DJ, Yang JH, Lee JB, et al. Esthetic improvement in the patient with one missing maxillary central incisor restored with porcelain laminate veneers. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2(3):77–80. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.77.
  3. Johnson N, Sandy J. An aesthetic index for evaluation of cleft repair. Eur J Orthod 2003;25(3):243–249. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.3.243.
  4. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130(2):141–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.017.
  5. Shaw WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981;79(4):399–415. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90382-1.
  6. Bashour M. An objective system for measuring facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(3):757–774. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000207382.60636.1c.
  7. Naini FB, Moss JP, Gill DS. The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130:277–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.027.
  8. Scott CR, Goonewardene MS, Murray K. Influence of lips on the perception of malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130(2):152–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.036.
  9. Sforza C, Laino A, D'Alessio R, et al. Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive children and normal children in the deciduous and early mixed dentition. Angle Orthod 2007;77(6): 1025–1033. DOI: 10.2319/100206-400.1.
  10. Snow SR. Esthetic smile analysis of maxillary anterior tooth width: the golden percentage. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(4):177–184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00397.x.
  11. Sterrett JD, Oliver T, Robinson F, et al. Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26(3):153–157. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.260304.x.
  12. Qualtrough AJ., Burke FJ. A look at dental aesthetics. Quintessence Int 1994;25(1):7–14.
  13. Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists’ and patient's concepts. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100(3):345–352. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0093.
  14. Gillen RJ, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ, et al. An analysis of selected normative tooth proportions. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7(5):410–417.
  15. Fayyad MA, Jaman KD, Aqrabawi J. Geometric and mathematical proportions and their relations to maxillary anterior teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7(5):1–10. DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-7-5-62.
  16. Murthy BV, Ramani S. Evaluation of natural smile: golden proportion, RED or golden percentage. J Conserv Dent 2008;11(1):16–21. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.43413.
  17. Rita ME, Kinga J, Carmen B, et al. Aesthetic Principles of the upper front teeth: application of golden proportion (levin) and golden percentage (snow). Acta Medica Marisiensis 2013;59(1):25–27. DOI: 10.2478/amma-2013-0005.
  18. Hasanresioglu U, Berksun S, Arus K, et al. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportion. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(6):530–538. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.007.
  19. Parnia F, Hafezeqoran A, Mahboub F, et al. Proportions of maxillary anterior teeth relative to each other and to the golden standard in tabriz dental faculty students. JODDD 2010;4(3):83–86. DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2010.021.
  20. Wolfart S, Quass AC, Freitag S, et al. Subjective and objective perception of upper incisors. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33(7):489–495. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01581.x.
  21. Peixoto LM, Louro RL, Gomes AA, et al. Photographic analysis of esthetic dental proportions. Rev Gaucha Odontol 2012;60(1):13–17.
  22. Marquardt SR. Dr. Stephen R. Marquardt on the golden decagon and human facial beauty. Interview by dr. Gottlieb. J Clin Orthod 2002;36(6):339–347.
  23. Lee SL, Kim HJ, Son MK, et al. Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using conebeam CT. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2(3):92–96. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.92.
  24. Gürel G. Predictable, precise, and repeatable tooth preparation for porcelain laminate veneers. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003;15(1): 17–24.
  25. Black GV. Descriptive anatomy of the human teeth. Philadelphia: The S.S. White Dental Manufacturing; 1902.
  26. Magne P, Gallucci GO, Belser UC. Anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in white subjects. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(5):453–461. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00125-2.
  27. Ku JE, Yang HS, Yun KD. A morphometric analysis of maxillary central incisor on the basis of facial appearance in Korea. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4(1):13–17. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.13.
  28. Mahajan V, Nagpal A, Gupta R, et al. Comparative evaluation of golden proportion, recurring esthetic dental proportion and golden percentage in Himachal demographic. J Adv Med Med Res 2019;29(10):1–7. DOI: 10.9734/jammr/2019/v29i1030133.
  29. Nalla S, Parth S, Siva S, et al. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth dimensions for the existence of golden proportion: clinical study. J Int Oral Health 2015;7(9):18–21.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.