The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2019 ) > List of Articles


Evaluation of Apical Dimension, Canal Taper and Maintenance of Root Canal Morphology Using XP-endo Shaper

Afif Tabbara, Dan Grigorescu, Mohammed A Yassin

Keywords : Endodontics, Microcomputed tomography, Root canal preparation, Three-dimensional shaping

Citation Information : Tabbara A, Grigorescu D, Yassin MA. Evaluation of Apical Dimension, Canal Taper and Maintenance of Root Canal Morphology Using XP-endo Shaper. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (2):136-144.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2488

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: To evaluate the shaping ability of the XP-endo shaper file system in maxillary molars, representing root canals with variation in morphology. Materials and methods: Twenty maxillary molars were instrumented according to recommended protocols. Pre- and postoperative microcomputed tomography (CT) scans were performed and the root canals classified according to canal type and curvature. The volume change, number of strokes needed to prepare the canals and the size of the 0.04-tapered gutta-percha cone that was adapted in the canal were recorded. Results: XP-endo shaper created a significant change in volume after instrumentation in all the canals, with the biggest change found in the DB canals, followed by the MB1 and the P canals, both at full length and in the apical 4 mm. The number of strokes needed to achieve working length and final shape did not differ between the various root canals. Although not significant, the number of strokes needed to prepare the root canal increased with severity of the curvature, but the severity of the curvature did not result in increased removal of dentin in the apical 4 mm. It was possible to achieve a final root canal size where a 0.04-tapered gutta-percha cone could be adapted. Conclusion: The XP-endo shaper was a safe and effective instrument to achieve a root canal preparation of at least size 30 and a 0.04 taper. Clinical significance: The clinical performance of XP-endo shaper was to some extent dependent on preoperative volume and curvature of the root canal.

PDF Share
  1. Averbach RE, Kleier DJ. Clinical update on root canal disinfection. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006 May;27(5):284-289.
  2. Schafer E, Schlingemann R. Efficiency of rotary nickeltitanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2003 Mar;36(3):208-217.
  3. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dental Clin North Am 1974 Apr;18(2):269-296.
  4. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics 2005 Mar;10(1):30-76.
  5. Usman N, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Influence of instrument size on root canal debridement. J Endod 2004 Feb;30(2):110-112.
  6. Paqué F, Ganahl D, Peters OA. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2009 Jul;35(7):1056-1059.
  7. Fornari VJ, Silva-Sousa YT, Vanni JR, Pécora JD, Versiani MA, Sousa-Neto MD. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of increased apical enlargement for cleaning the apical third of curved canals. Int Endod J 2010 Nov;43(11):988-994.
  8. Ahlquist M, Henningsson O, Hultenby K, Ohlin J. The effectiveness of manual and rotary techniques in the cleaning of root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study. Int Endod J 2001 Oct;34(7):533-537.
  9. Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S, Breschi L, Malagnino VA, Prati C. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2004 Dec;37(12):832-839.
  10. Gambarini G, Laszkiewicz J. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2002 May;35(5): 422-427.
  11. Hülsmann M, Rummelin C, Schäfers F. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. J Endod 1997 May;23(5):301-306.
  12. Hülsmann M, Gressmann G, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2003 May;36(5):358-566.
  13. Paqué F, Musch U, Hülsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2005 Jan;38(1):8-16.
  14. Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2004 Apr;37(4): 239-248.
  15. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canals. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol, Endod 1995 Apr;79(4): 492-496.
  16. Siqueira JF, Jr., Alves FR, Versiani MA, et al. Correlative bacteriologic and micro-computed tomographic analysis of mandibular molar mesial canals prepared by self-adjusting file, reciproc, and twisted file systems. J Endod 2013 Aug; 39(8):1044-1050.
  17. Peters OA, Arias A, Paqué F. A micro-computed tomographic assessment of root canal preparation with a novel instrument, TRUShape, in mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 2015 Sep;41(9):1545-1550.
  18. Paqué F, Zehnder M, De-Deus G. Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence. J Endod 2011 Oct;37(10): 1394-1397.
  19. Markvart M, Darvann TA, Larsen P, Dalstra M, Kreiborg S, Bjørndal L. Micro-CT analyses of apical enlargement and molar root canal complexity. Int Endod J 2012 Mar;45(3):273- 281.
  20. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 2014 Nov;40(11):1860-1864.
  21. Seltzer S, Bender IB, Smith J, Freedman I, Nazimov H. Endodontic failures--an analysis based on clinical, roentgenographic, and histologic findings. II. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1967 Apr;23(4):517-530.
  22. Seltzer S, Bender IB, Smith J, Freedman I, Nazimov H. Endodontic failures--an analysis based on clinical, roentgenographic, and histologic findings. I. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1967 Apr;23(4):500-516.
  23. Engström B, Lundberg M. The correlation between positive culture and the prognosis of root canal therapy after pulpectomy. Odontol Revy 1965;16(3):193-203.
  24. Iqbal A. The factors responsible for endodontic treatment failure in the permanent dentitions of the patients reported to the college of dentistry, the university of Aljouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Clin Diagn Res 2016 May;10(5):146-148.
  25. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int End J 2003 Feb;36(2):86-92.
  26. Peters OA, Paqué F. Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with the self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2011 Jan;37(1):53-57.
  27. Hübscher W, Barbakow F, Peters OA. Root-canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J 2003 Nov;36(11):740-747.
  28. Solomonov M, Paqué F, Fan B, Eilat Y, Berman LH. The challenge of C-shaped canal systems: a comparative study of the self-adjusting file and ProTaper. J Endod 2012 Feb;38(2):209-214.
  29. De-Deus G, Souza EM, Barino B, Maia J, Zamolyi RQ, Reis C, Kfir A. The self-adjusting file optimizes debridement quality in oval-shaped root canals. J Endod 2011 May;37(5): 701-705.
  30. Shah DY, Wadekar SI, Dadpe AM, Jadhav GR, Choudhary LJ, Kalra DD. Canal transportation and centering ability of protaper and self-adjusting file system in long oval canals: An ex-vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Conserv Dent 2017 Mar-Apr;20(2):105-109.
  31. Jain N, Pawar AM, Ukey PD, Jain PK, Thakur B, Gaupta A. Preservation of root canal anatomy using self-adjusting file instrumentation with glide path prepared by 20/0.02 hand files versus 20/0.04 rotary files. J Conserv Dent 2017 Mar- Apr;20(2):81-85.
  32. Bortoluzzi EA, Carlon D, Jr., Meghil MM, El-Awady AR, Niu L, Bergeron BE, Susin L, Cutler CW, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Efficacy of 3D conforming nickel titanium rotary instruments in eliminating canal wall bacteria from oval-shaped root canals. J Dent 2015 May;43(5):597-604.
  33. Arias A, Paqué F, Shyn S, Murphy S, Peters OA. Effect of canal preparation with TRUShape and Vortex rotary instruments on three-dimensional geometry of oval root canals. Aust Endod J 2018 Apr;44(1):32-39.
  34. Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, Silva EJNL, Souza EM, Versiani MA, Lopes RT, De-Deus G. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J 2018 May;51(5):564-571.
  35. Silva E, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, Antunes HDS, Cavalcante DM, Elias CN, De-Deus G. Cyclic and Torsional Fatigue Resistance of XP-endo Shaper and TRUShape Instruments. J Endod 2018 Jan;44(1):168-172.
  36. Lacerda M, Marceliano-Alves MF, Perez AR, Provenzano JC, Neves MAS, Pires FR, Gonçalves LS, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr. Cleaning and shaping oval canals with 3 instrumentation systems: A correlative micro-computed tomographic and histologic study. J Endod 2017 Nov;43(11):1878-1884.
  37. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Torsional resistance of XP-endo Shaper at body temperature compared with several nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2018 May;51(5):572-576.
  38. Elnaghy A, Elsaka S. Cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-endo Shaper compared with different nickel-titanium alloy instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018 Apr;22(3):1433-1437.
  39. Bayram HM, Bayram E, Ocak M, Uygun AD, Celik HH. Effect of ProTaper Gold, Self-Adjusting File, and XP-endo Shaper instruments on dentinal microcrack formation: a microcomputed tomographic study. J Endod 2017 Jul;43(7):1166-1169.
  40. Azim AA, Piasecki L, da Silva Neto UX, Cruz ATG, Azim KA. XP Shaper, A novel adaptive core rotary instrument: microcomputed tomographic analysis of its shaping abilities. J Endod 2017 Sep;43(9):1532-1538.
  41. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1971 Aug;32(2):271-275.
  42. Cunningham CJ, Senia ES. A three-dimensional study of canal curvatures in the mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 1992 Jun;18(6):294-300.
  43. Bellucci F, Ambu E. Root canal shaping with latest generation expanding instruments. en/2017/12/root-canal-shaping-expansion-endoshaperendofinisher/ Accessed October 20th, 2018.
  44. Debelian G, Serota KS, Trope M, Endodontic reboot - Part one. endodontic-reboot-part-one Accessed October20th, 2018.
  45. FKG Dentaire SA. XP-Endo shaper protocol card. Accessed October 20th, 2018.
  46. Moule AJ, Kellaway R, Clarkson R, Rowell J, Macfarlane R, Lewis D, Cameron T, Atkins D. Variability of master guttapercha cones. Aust Endod J 2002 Apr;28(1):38-43.
  47. Cunningham KP, Walker MP, Kulild JC, Lask JT. Variability of the diameter and taper of size #30, 0.04 gutta-percha cones. J Endod 2006 Nov;32(11):1081-1084.
  48. Versiani MA, Carvalho KKT, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Sousa- Neto MD. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of XP-endo Shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems in long oval-shaped canals. J Endod 2018 Mar;44(3): 489-495.
  49. De Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J. Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod 2010 Sep;36(9):1580-1583.
  50. Arslan H, Capar ID, Saygili G, Gok T, Akcay M. Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming on removal of apically placed dentinal debris. Int Endod J 2014 Nov;47(11):1072- 1077.
  51. Urban K, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2017 Dec;21(9):2681-2687.
  52. Nielsen BA, Craig Baumgartner J. Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod 2007 May;33(5):611-615.
  53. Elnaghy AM, Mandorah A, Elsaka SE. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and file agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study. Odontology 2017 Apr;105(2):178-183.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.