The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Periodic Assessment of Peri-implant Tissue Changes: Imperative for Implant Success

Shaifulizan Ab Rahman, Hazelina Muhammad, Sanjida Haque

Keywords : Implant stability, Osseointegration, Peri-implant, Resonance frequency analysis

Citation Information : Rahman SA, Muhammad H, Haque S. Periodic Assessment of Peri-implant Tissue Changes: Imperative for Implant Success. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (2):173-178.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2493

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-02-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues and implant stability and to assess the correlation of bone loss and peri-implant probing depth with implant stability. Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients with implants were included in this study and implants were assessed by resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Bone levels of the implants were assessed by measuring mesial and distal bone levels from the periapical radiograph, and soft tissue was assessed from probing depth using a periodontal probe. Implants were assessed for stability and probing depth at pre-loading, at 3 months and 6 months post-loading. RFA and probing depth were statistically compared from different time points. Correlation of probing depth and marginal bone loss with implant stability was also determined. Results: The average change in implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurements from pre-loading to 6 months post-loading was found to be statistically significant (p <0.005). The average probing depth reduced from 1.767 mm at pre-loading to 1.671 mm at post-loading 3 months, and 1.600 mm at post-loading 6 months. At 6 months of function, radiographic examination yielded 0.786 mm mesial bone loss and 0.8 mm distal bone loss. It was found to be statistically significant (p <0.005) but within an acceptable range. No significant correlation was found between implant stability and bone loss; and implant stability and probing depth. Conclusion: The study revealed an increasing trend in implant stability values with the time that indicates successful osseointegration. Increasing mean values for mesial and distal bone loss were also found. Clinical significance: The success of dental implants is highly dependent on the quality of bone and implant-bone interface, i.e., osseointegration. The most important factors that influence the survival rate of an implant is initial stability. The present study found the changes in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues and implant stability. This article, while being a prospective study, may show the evidence of successful osseointegration by increasing trend in implant stability (RFA) values with time which can help to the clinician in the long-term management of implants.


PDF Share
  1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410.
  2. Branemark R, Branemark P, Rydevik B, Myers RR. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. J Rehab Res Dev 2001;38:175-182.
  3. Li W, Lin D, Rungsiyakull C, Zhou S, Swain M, Li Q. Finite element based bone remodeling and resonance frequency analysis for osseointegration assessment of dental implants. FinElem Analys Des 2011;47:898-905.
  4. Yang SM, Shin SY, Kye SB. Relationship between implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and bone loss during early healing period. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiolog Endodont 2008;105: e12-e19.
  5. Huang HL, Tu MG, Fuh LJ, Chen YC, Wu CL, Chen SI et al. Effects of elasticity and structure of trabecular bone on the primary stability of dental implants. J Med Biol Eng 2010; 30:85-89.
  6. Oh JS, Kim SG, Lim SC, Ong JL. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiolog Endodont 2009;107:513-518.
  7. Puleo D, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone– implant interface. Biomat 1999;20:2311-2321.
  8. Zhou Y, Jiang T, Qian M, Zhang X, Wang J, Shi B, et al. Roles of bone scintigraphy and resonance frequency analysis in evaluating osseointegration of endosseous implant. Biomat 2008; 29:461-474.
  9. Lin D, Li Q, Li W, Swain M. Bone remodeling induced by dental implants of functionally graded materials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: App Biomat 2010; 92:430-438.
  10. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosth 1997;11:491-501.
  11. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Soft tissue management at implant sites. J Clin Periodont 2008;35:163-167.
  12. Small PN, Tarnow DP. Gingival recession around implants: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:527-532.
  13. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello C, Liljenberg B, Thornsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:81-90.
  14. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. J Clin Periodont 1998;25:721-727.
  15. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-toimplant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:113-119.
  16. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:186-197.
  17. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:557-562.
  18. De Rouck T, Collys K, Cosyn J. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: a 1-year case cohort study on hard and soft tissue response. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:649-657.
  19. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Zhang K, Wimmer G, Wegscheider WA. Immediate loading of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. Preliminary results after one year. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:180-187.
  20. Tsirlis AT. Clinical evaluation of immediate loaded upper anterior single implants. Implant Dent 2005;14:94-103.
  21. Lang NP, Hill RW. Radiographs in periodonties. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:16-28.
  22. Lang NP, Wilson TG, Corbet EF. Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment Note. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:146-155.
  23. Brägger U, Pasquali L, Rylander H, Carnes D, Kornman KS. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:27-37.
  24. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang N. Tissue integration of nonsubmerged implants. l-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40.
  25. Weber H, Buser D, Fiorellini J, Williams R. Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels adjacent to nonsubmerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:181-188.
  26. Hsu J-T, Huang H-L, Tsai M-T, Wu A-J, Tu M-G, Fuh L-J. Effects of the 3D bone-to-implant contact and bone stiffness on the initial stability of a dental implant: micro-CT and resonance frequency analyses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:276-280.
  27. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66.
  28. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergström C, et al. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;14:639-645.
  29. Fischer K, Bäckström M, Sennerby L. Immediate and Early Loading of Oxidized Tapered Implants in the Partially Edentulous Maxilla: A 1-Year Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:69-80.
  30. Proussaefs P, Kan J, Lozada J, Kleinman A, Farnos A. Effects of immediate loading with threaded hydroxyapatite-coated rootform implants on single premolar replacements: a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;17:567-572.
  31. Apse P, Zarb G, Schmitt A, Lewis D. The longitudinal effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto Study: peri-implant mucosal response. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991;11:94-111.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.