The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

An In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Root Canal Irrigating Solutions against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans

Anurag Sarin, Prashant Bhasin, Mohit Sharma, Deepti Bindal, Deepak Tomar

Keywords : Chlorhexidine, Confocal laser scanning microscopy, Irrigating solution, Streptococcus mutans

Citation Information : Sarin A, Bhasin P, Sharma M, Bindal D, Tomar D. An In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Root Canal Irrigating Solutions against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (2):221-225.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2501

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-02-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare antimicrobial effect of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) and N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) irrigating solutions against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 40 freshly extracted noncarious permanent mandibular incisors teeth of both genders (males-12, females-14). In all teeth, root canal preparation was done up to size 40 K-file. Roots were sterilized and microbial suspension of mixed culture of the tested microorganisms was inoculated into canals and incubated for 48 h. Teeth were divided into four groups, group I (5.25% sodium hypochlorite), group II (2% chlorhexidine), group III (200 mg/mL N-Acetylcysteine NAC) and group IV (sterile distilled water). The antimicrobial effect in each group was compared. Results: Statistical evaluation was completed using statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Planktonic S. mutans bacterial count was lowest in group III followed by group I, group II and group IV. E. faecalis count was 6.14 ± 0.12 in group I, 5.76 ± 0.44 in group II, 3.88 ± 0.08 in group III and 11.98 ± 1.04 in group IV. The difference was significant (p < 0.05). The proportion of dead cell found to be 0.04± 0.01, 0.72 ± 0.06, 0.01 ± 0.06 and 1.02 ± 0.11 in groups I, II, III and IV respectively. The difference was significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: NAC proved to be effective against E. faecalis and S. mutans. This solution can be considered alternative in root canal infections in addition with CHX and NaOCl. Clinical significance: Effectiveness of three different irrigating solutions was compared and NAC found to be more efficient in decreasing bacterial count. Hence, NAC can be precisely used in irrigating root canals to achieve optimal clinical outcomes particularly regarding reoccurrences of infections. Furthermore, NAC could be proved as a promising innovation in future endodontic methodologies.


PDF Share
  1. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54:291-312.
  2. Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontic: review. Int Endod J 2009;42: 288-302.
  3. Rucucci D, Siqueira JF. Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endod 2010;36:1277-1288.
  4. Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza E, Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the antimicrobial action and the mechanical ability of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant. J Endod 2001;27:452-455.
  5. Charles H. Stuart, Scott A. Schwartz, Thomas J. Beeson, Christopher B. Owatz. Enterococcus faecalis: It's Role in Root Canal Treatment Failure and Current Concepts in Retreatment. JOE 2006;32:93-98.
  6. Koch S, Hufnagel M, Theilacker C, Huebner J. Enterococcal infections: host response, therapeutic, and prophylactic possibilities. Vaccine 2004;22:822-830.
  7. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod 2006;32:93-98.
  8. Kishen A, George S, Kumar R. Enterococcus faecalis-mediated biomineralized biofilm formation on root canal dentine in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 2006;77:406-415.
  9. da Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P, Faria G, de Souza-Gugelmin MC. Bacterial profile in primary teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions. Braz Dent J 2006;17:144-148.
  10. Chavez de Paz L. Gram-positive organisms in endodontic infections. Endod Top 2004;9:79-96.
  11. Vijaykumar S, Guna Shekhar M, Himagiri S. In vitro effectiveness of different endodontic irrigants on the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals. J Clin Exp Dent 2010;2:169- 172.
  12. Estrela C, Silva JA, Goncalves De, Alencar AH, Leles CR, Decurcio DA. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalise.a systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16:364-368.
  13. Darrag AM. Antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic irrigation solutions against planktonic microorganisms and dualspecies biofilm. Tanta Den J 2013;129-137.
  14. Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, Espigares-Garcýa M, Baca P. Enterococcus faecalis biofilms eradication by root canal irrigants. J Endod 2009;35:711-714.
  15. Berber VB, Gomes BP, Sena NT, Vianna ME, Ferraz CC, Zaia AA, et al. Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules. Int Endod J 2006;39:10-17.
  16. Cindy HR, Rene HD, Sergio GR, Diana RP, Claudio CR. Rifampicin and N-acteylcisteyne inhibit oral bacterial growthand biofilm formation. Pharmaceut Innovat J 2013;2:16-23.
  17. Hugo WB, Russell AD. Chemical disinfectants, antiseptics, and preservatives. In: Pharmaceutical microbiology. 6th ed. Blackwell Science Ltd; 2000.
  18. Vianna ME, Gomes BP, Berber VB, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Jose' de Souza-Filho F. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Ora Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:79-84.
  19. Anuradha B, Rajamoni I, Lalitha MK, Sriram T. A new irrigant against E.faecalis in the root canal disinfection. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2014;11:121.127.
  20. Yap B, Zilm PS, Briggs N, Rogers AH, Cathro PC. The effect of sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis when grown on dentine as a single. and multi.species biofilm. Aust Endod J 2014;40:101.110.
  21. Palaniswamy U, Lakkam SR, Arya S, Aravelli S. Effectiveness of N-acetyl cysteine, 2% chlorhexidine, and their combination as intracanal medicaments on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J Conserv Dent 2016;19:17-20.
  22. Ghivari SB, Bhattacharya H, Bhat KG, Pujar MA. Antimicrobial activity of root canal irrigants against biofilm forming pathogens. An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2017;20:147-151.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.