The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Sealing Capacity of Bulk-fill Resin in Endodontically Treated Teeth

Mônica S de Albuquerque, Armiliana S Nascimento, Kêsia XFR de Sena, Carlos VJ Oliveira, Leonardo JR Oliveira, Marianne V Carvalho, Maria HA Cavalcanti, Rodivan Braz

Keywords : Bacterial microleakage, Bulk-fill, Composites, Dye microleakage, Enterococcus faecalis

Citation Information : Albuquerque MS, Nascimento AS, Sena KX, Oliveira CV, Oliveira LJ, Carvalho MV, Cavalcanti MH, Braz R. Sealing Capacity of Bulk-fill Resin in Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (3):311-317.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2515

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-03-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The objective of the study is to evaluate the cervicalapical sealing of bulk-fill flow resins associated with a universal adhesive system, in endodontically treated teeth, considering two methods of evaluation. Materials and methods: The samples used in the bacterial leakage analysis were autoclaved, filled inside a laminar flow chamber, and divided into four experimental groups (n = 8) according to the restorative material: Filtek Bulk-fill flow; Surefil SDR flow; Tetric Evoflow and the positive control. The samples were inoculated with the Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), every 7 days and the microleakage was evaluated on a daily basis for 60 days. Microleakage tested with dye (n = 5) was considered in 2-time intervals of evaluation (24 hours and 72 hours), and the results were obtained in scores from 0–5. Data were submitted to the statistical tests, at a level of significance of 0.05. Results: About 12.5% of the FBF specimens showed bacterial microleakage as from the thirteenth day, and SDR, from the 20th day. TEF presented the highest percentage of microleakage at 40 days, concluding the 60 days with 37.5% of viable specimens. The Log-rank test revealed that the survival curve of TEF was statistically significant in comparison with those of the other groups. In the test with dye TEF and SDR presented the highest and lowest rate of microleakage, respectively, with statistically significant differences in the time interval of 72h. Conclusion: The resins FBF, SDR, and TEF were incapable of promoting the hermetic sealing of fillings in the root canal system. Clinical significance: No bulk-fill flux studied was able to completely eliminate microleakage, despite the best performance with respect to the microleakage time presented by Filtek Bulk fill, followed by Surefil SDR flow.


PDF Share
  1. Roy D, Chowdhury F, Shaik MM, Alam MK. Apical sealing ability of resilon/epiphany system. Dent Res J.2014;11(2): 222-227
  2. Al-Maswary AA, Alhadainy HA, et al. Coronal Microleakage of the Resilon and Gutta-Percha Obturation Materials with Epiphany SE Sealer: An in vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res.2016;10(5):39-42.
  3. Damman D, Grazziotin-Soares R, Farina AP, et al. Coronal microleakage of restorations with or without cervical barrier in root-filled teeth. Rev Odonto Sci 2012;27(3):208-212.
  4. Shetty k, Habib VA Shetty SV, et al. An assessment of coronal leakage of permanent filling materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015;7(Suppl 2):S607-S611.
  5. Manne US, Sunil K, Arvind K, et al. Comparing marginal microleakage of three Bulk Fill composites in Class II cavities using confocal microscope: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(5):409-413.
  6. Adnan S, Khan FR. Comparison of Micro-Leakage Around Temporary Restorative Materials Placed in Complex Endodontic Access Cavities: An In-Vitro Study. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016;26(3):182-186.
  7. Tavangar M, Tayefeh Davalloo R, Darabi F, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Two Low-Shrinkage Composites with a Conventional Resin Composite: an In Vitro Assessment. J Dent. 2016;17(1):55-61.
  8. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill Resin-based Composites: An In Vitro Assessment of Their Mechanical Performance. Oper Dent. 2013;38(6):618-625.
  9. Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1991-2000.
  10. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res. 2012; 91(4):376-381.
  11. Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD. In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1990;16(12):566-569.
  12. Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterhwaitey D. Degree of conversion of Bulk Fill compared to convencional resin composites at two time inervals. Dent Mater 2013;29(9):213-217.
  13. Garcia D, Yaman P, Dennison J, et al. Polymerization Shrinkage and Depth of Cure of Bulk Fill Flowable Composite Resins. Oper Dent 2014;39(4):441-448.
  14. Lopes GC. Novas Tendências: Resina composta de baixa contração. Inter J Braz Dent.2009;5(1):12-16.
  15. Khayat A, Lee SJ, Torabinejad M. Human saliva penetration of coronally unsealed obturated root canals. J Endod.1993;19(9):458-461.
  16. Chailertvanitkul P, Saunders WP, MacKenzie D, et al. An in vitro study of the coronal leakage of two root canal sealers using an obligate anaerobe microbial marker. Int Endod J.1996;29(4):249-255.
  17. Mavec JC, McClanahan SB, Minah GE, et al. Effects of an intracanal glass ionomer barrier on coronal microleakage in teeth with post space. J Endod 2006;32:120-122.
  18. Barthel CR, Moshonov J, Shuping G, et al. Bacterial leakage versus dye leakage in obturated root canals. Int Endod J. 1999;32:370-375.
  19. Umer F, Naz F, Khan FR. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage in class V preparations restored with Hybrid versus Silorane composites. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14(2): 103-107.
  20. Swain MV, Xue J. State of the art of micro-CT applications in dental research. Int J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;1(4):177-188.
  21. Chen X, Li P, Wang X, et al. Ex vivo antimicrobial efficacy of strong acid electrolytic water against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Int Endod J.2013; 46:938-946.
  22. De Santi FAA, Pinelli C, Loffredo LCM. Reliability of marginal microleakage assessment by visual and digital methods. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(1):1-5.
  23. Gomes AC, Nejaim Y, Silva AIV, et al. Influence of Endodontic Treatment and Coronal Restoration on Status of Periapical Tissues: A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study. J Endod. 2015;41:1614-1618.
  24. Alkahtani A, Al-Subait S, Anil S. An in vitro comparative study of the adaptation and sealing ability of two carrier-based root canal obturators. Sci World J. 2013 May;2013:532023.
  25. Saleh IM, Ruyter IE, Haapasalo M, et al. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in infected dentinal tubules after root canal filling with different root canal sealers in vitro. Int Endod J. 2004;37(3):193-198.
  26. Beach CW, Calhoun JC, Bramwell JD, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Bacterial Leakage of Endodontic Temporary Filling Mater J Endod 1996; 22(9):459-462.
  27. Newcomb BE, Clark SJ, Eleazer PD. Degradation of the sealing properties of a zinc oxide-calcium sulfate-based temporary filling material by entrapped cotton fibers. J Endod. 2001;27(12):789-790.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.