The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of Plaque Removal and Wear between Charcoal Infused Bristle and Nylon Bristle Toothbrushes: A Randomized Clinical Crossover Study

Vineet Kini, Seema Yadav, Jaishree A Rijhwani, Arjumand Farooqui, Amruta A Joshi, Sidheshwar G Phad

Keywords : Charcoal infused bristle, Cross-over study, Nylon bristle, Plaque removal, Randomized clinical trial, Toothbrush wear

Citation Information : Kini V, Yadav S, Rijhwani JA, Farooqui A, Joshi AA, Phad SG. Comparison of Plaque Removal and Wear between Charcoal Infused Bristle and Nylon Bristle Toothbrushes: A Randomized Clinical Crossover Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (3):377-384.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2525

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-03-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To compare plaque removal and wear between charcoal infused bristle toothbrushes (T1) and nylon bristle toothbrushes (T2) in a randomized clinical crossover study. Materials and methods: A cross-over study was conducted in 2 phases of 6 weeks duration each with an intervening 2-week washout. Twenty-five participants meeting inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into groups A (13) and B (12). In phase 1: group A was assigned T1 and group B was assigned T2. Toothbrushing was advised twice daily for 2 minutes by modified bass technique after meals. At baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks the wear index (WI), plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) were recorded. Following washout in phase 2 group A was assigned T2 and group B was assigned T1 and the same study protocol was followed. Results: Intra-group comparison between baseline, 3 and 6 weeks by the paired t-test resulted in significant reduction in PI, GI and increase in WI (p <0.05) for T1 and T2. Inter-group comparison using the unpaired t-test resulted in WI for T1 being significantly higher (p <0.05) at 3 weeks and lower at 6 weeks (p <0.05) compared to T2. PI for T1 was significantly higher at 3 weeks (p <0.05) and lower at 6 weeks (p <0.05) compared to T2. No significant difference in GI scores between T1 and T2 at 3 and 6 weeks was observed (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Charcoal infused bristles demonstrated less wear and more plaque removal compared to nylon bristles. Clinical significance: Charcoal infused bristles demonstrate less wear compared to nylon bristles.


PDF Share
  1. Breuer MM, Cosgrove RS. The Relationship Between Gingivitis and Plaque Levels. J. Periodontol.1989; 60(4):172-175.
  2. Asadoorian J. CDHA. Position Paper on Tooth Brushing. CJDH. 2006; 40(5): 232-248.
  3. Bergenholtz A, Gustafsson LB, Segerlund N, et al. The role of brushing technique and toothbrush design in plaque removal. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92(4):344-351.
  4. Terézhalmy GT, Biesbrock AR, Walters PA, et al. Clinical evaluation of brushing time and plaque removal potential of two manual toothbrushes. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2008;6(4):321- 327.
  5. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, et al. Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force. J Clin Periodontol. 1998; 25(5):413-416.
  6. Nieri M, Giani M, Pagliaro U, et al. Efficacy and preference of manual toothbrushes: a randomised, single blind, controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2013;6(2):181-188.
  7. Harpenau L, Meyers G, Lyon C, et al. Blinded Clinical Evaluation of a New Manual Toothbrush. J Clin Dent. 2006; 17 (1):1-4.
  8. Claydon N, Addy M, Scratcher C, et al. Comparative professional plaque removal study using 8 branded toothbrushes. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(4):310-316.
  9. Hedge S, Kakade AA, Rajesh KS, et al. Evaluation of plaque removal efficacy of two manual toothbrushes with different textures: a comparative analysis. Journal of Oral Health Research. 2011; 2(3):84-90.
  10. Claydon N, Addy M. Comparative single-use plaque removal by toothbrushes of different designs. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23 (12): 1112-1116.
  11. Dörfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy ER, Kugel B, et al. Cleaning Efficacy of a Manual Toothbrush with Tapered Filaments. Oral Health Prev Dent 2003;1(2):111-118.
  12. Tangade PS, Shah AF, Ravishankar TL, et al. Pal S. Is plaque removal efficacy of toothbrush related to bristle flaring? A 3-month prospective parallel experimental study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2013; 23(3):255-264.
  13. Daly CG, Chappie CC, Cameron AC. Effect of toothbrush wear on plaque control. J Clin Periodontol 1996:23(1):45-49.
  14. Tan E, Daly C. Comparison of new and 3-month-old toothbrushes in plaque removal. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29 (7): 645-650.
  15. Versteeg PA, Rosema NAM, Timmerman MF, et al. Evaluation of two soft manual toothbrushes with different filament designs in relation to gingival abrasion and plaque removing efficacy. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2008;6(3):166-173.
  16. Vowles AD, Wade AB. Importance of Filament Diameter when Using Bass Brushing Technique. J Periodontol.1977; 48(8):460-463.
  17. Cifcibasi E, Koyuncuoglu CZ, Baser U, Bozacioglu B, et al. Comparison of manual toothbrushes with different bristle designs in terms of cleaning efficacy and potential role on gingival recession. Eur J Dent 2014;8(3):395-401.
  18. McCracken GI, Steen N, Preshaw PM, et al. The crossover design to evaluate the efficacy of plaque removal in tooth-brushing studies. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32 (11): 1157-1162.
  19. Loe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol.1967;38(6):610-616.
  20. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Piscaer M, et al. Effectiveness of an electrically active toothbrush in the removal of overnight plaque and treatment of gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(8):699-704.
  21. Rawls HR, Mkwayi-Tulloch NJ, Casella R, et al. The Measurement of Toothbrush Wear. J Dent Res. 1989; 68(12):1781-1785.
  22. Rawls HR, Casella R, Mkwayi-Tulloch NJ. An in vitro and in vivo Study of Toothbrush bristle Splaying. J Dent Res. 1993;72(5):947-952.
  23. Sforza NM, Rimondini L, di Menna F, et al. Plaque removal by worntoothbrush. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27 (3): 212–216.
  24. Williams K, Ferrante A, Dockter K, et al. One- and 3- Minute Plaque Removal by a Battery Operated Versus a Manual toothbrush. J Periodontol. 2004; 75(8):1107-1113.
  25. Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol.1965.36(3):177-187.
  26. Costa MR, da Silva VC, Miqui MN, et al. Effects of ultrasonic, electric, and manual toothbrushes on subgingival plaque composition in orthodontically banded molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(2): 229-235.
  27. Gibson JA, Wade AB. Plaque removal by the Bass and Roll brushing techniques. J Periodontol. 1977;48(8):456-459.
  28. Kreifeldt JG, Hill PH, Calisti LJ. A systematic study of the plaque removal efficacy of worn toothbrushes. J Dent Res. 1908:59(12):2047-2055.
  29. Glaze PM, Wade AB. Toothbrush age and wear as it relates to plaque control. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13(1):52-56.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.