The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Correlation of Cervical Vertebral Bone Age and Demirjian's Stages of Dental Maturation for Lower Left Permanent Canine and Second Molar

Narayan Kulkarni

Keywords : Cervical vertebral bone age, Demirjian\'s method, Dental maturation

Citation Information : Kulkarni N. Correlation of Cervical Vertebral Bone Age and Demirjian's Stages of Dental Maturation for Lower Left Permanent Canine and Second Molar. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (4):471-475.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2541

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and correlate cervical vertebral bone age(CVBA) and Demirjian\'s stages of dental maturation for lower left permanent canine(CMS) and second molar (MMS). Materials and methods: A cross-sectional radiographic study was conducted on 264 participants with age group of 7–18 years who were further categorized into six subgroups having an interval of 2 years chronologic age. The CVBA, CMS, and MMS were assessed for the same patient. The assessment of CVBA of the participants involved in the study was derived from the equation given by Mito et al. The height and width of the 3rd and 4th cervical vertebra was measured with the help of IC measure software. The dental maturation was assessed as per the morphologic classification method given by Demirijian. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey\'s multiple comparisons and Spearman\'s correlation coefficient was utilized to determine the significance and correlation between the age groups, CVBA, CMS, and MMS. The multiple comparison levels were set at 0.05 level of significance. Results: Significantly different CVBA was observed among each individual stage of CMS and MMS. Significant changes in the dimensions of the cervical vertebra were observed when the dental maturation stage progressed from F to G and G to H stage. Conclusion: Chronologic age had a moderate correlation with CVBA. CVBA was significant for all the stages of maturation of CMS and MMS. Females revealed a higher level of maturation. A significant difference in the vertebral bone age was observed in the transition of stage F to G and G to H of dental maturation of canine and molar. Both CMS and MMS revealed a significant strong positive correlation with CVBA. Clinical significance: Cervical vertebral bone age can be utilized as an adjunct in identifying the stages of dental maturation of lower left permanent canine and second molar.


PDF Share
  1. Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod. Dentofac Orthop 1995;107:58-66
  2. Kiran S, Sharma VP, Tandon P, et al. To establish the validity of dental age assessment using Nolla's method on comparing with skeletal age assessed by hand-wrist radiographs. J Orthod Res 2013;1:11-15
  3. Suri S, Prasad C, Bryan T et al. Longitudinal comparison of skeletal age determined by the Greulich and Pyle method and chronologic age in normally growing children, and clinical interpretations for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2013;143:50-60.
  4. Goyal S, Goyal S, Gugnani N. Assessment of skeletal maturity using the permanent mandibular canine calcification stages. J Orthod Res 2014;2:11-16.
  5. Uysal T, Sari Z, Ramoglu S, et al. Relationship between dental and skeletal maturity in Turkish subjects. Angle Orhod 2004;74(5):657-664.
  6. Larry J Green. The interrelationships among height, weight and chronological, dental and skeletal ages. Angle Orhod. 1961;31(3):189- 193.
  7. Mito T, Sato K, Mitani H. Cervical vertebral bone age in girls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthod 2002;122:380-385.
  8. Caldas MP, Ambrosano GM, Haiter Neto F. Computer-assisted analysis of cervical vertebral bone age using cephalometric radiographs in Brazilian subjects. Brazilian oral research. 2010;24(1):120-126.
  9. Bambha JK. Longitudinal cephalometric roentgenographic study of face and cranium in relation to body height. The Journal of the American Dental Association 1961;63(6):776-799.
  10. Fishman LS. Chronological versus skeletal age, an evaluation of craniofacial growth. The Angle Orthodontist 1979;49(3):181-189.
  11. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr JA. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. The Angle Orthodontist 2002;72(4): 316-323.
  12. Perinetti G, Caprioglio A, Contardo L. Visual assessment of the cervical vertebral maturation stages: A study of diagnostic accuracy and repeatability. The Angle Orthodontist. 2014 Mar 25;84(6):951-956.
  13. Kumar S, Singla A, Sharma R, et al. Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular second molar calcification stages. The Angle Orthodontist 2011;82(3):501-506.
  14. Kumar S, Agarwal N, Mehrotra AK. Evaluation of skeletal maturity in North Indian subjects using an objective method based on cervical vertebral bone age and assessment of its reliability as compared to hand wrist radiographic method. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 2016;50(1):3.
  15. Srkoc T, Mestrovic S, Anic-Milosevis S, et al. Association between dental and skeletal maturation stages in Croatian subjects. Actaclinica Croatica 2015;54(4.):445-452.
  16. Rozylo-Kalinowska I, Kolasa-Rączka A, Kalinowski P. Relationship between dental age according to Demirjian and cervical vertebrae maturity in Polish children. The European Journal of Orthodontics 2010;33(1):75-83.
  17. Chen J, Hu H, Guo J, et al. Correlation between dental maturity and cervical vertebral maturity. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2010 Dec 1;110(6):777- 783.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.