The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2019 ) > List of Articles


Dental Caries and Risk Factors in Swedish Adolescents about to Start Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Appliances

Sara Rangmar, Heidrun Kjellberg, Dowen Birkhed

Keywords : Cariogenic bacteria, Dental caries, Orthodontics, Teenagers

Citation Information : Rangmar S, Kjellberg H, Birkhed D. Dental Caries and Risk Factors in Swedish Adolescents about to Start Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Appliances. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (5):537-542.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2553

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the caries situation in a group of Swedish adolescents, who were scheduled for orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Materials and methods: An age- and gender-matched control group was selected from the same city (Malmö, Sweden). Caries and fillings on smooth surfaces and fillings on occlusal surfaces were diagnosed clinically and caries and fillings on approximal surfaces by bitewings. Numbers of mutans streptococci (MS) and lactobacilli (LB) were analyzed in saliva. Results: There were no significant differences regarding manifest caries lesions and fillings on smooth surfaces. Numbers of occlusal-filled surfaces (FS) and approximal decayed and filled surfaces were around 10%, but did not differ between the groups. However, 53% had approximal enamel caries lesions in the test group and 46% in the control group. The prevalence of approximal decayed surfaces (DS) and FS was low in both groups, 0.57 ± 1.41 in the test group and 0.65 ± 1.38 in the control group (p > 0.05), i.e., somewhat more DS in the control group (p < 0.05). Most individuals had low/medium counts of cariogenic bacteria in their saliva and less than 10% high counts in both groups. Conclusion: Most Swedish adolescents who have been scheduled for treatment with fixed appliances appear to have a low-to-medium caries risk nowadays. However, around 10% of all approximal tooth surfaces of premolars/molars had enamel caries and one-third of the individuals had medium/high counts of cariogenic bacteria in their saliva, which may be risk factors for future caries during orthodontic treatment. Clinical significance: Bitewing radiographs are important before starting orthodontic treatment and approximal caries and many cariogenic bacteria may be risk factors for orthodontic treatment.

PDF Share
  1. Palvarinne R, Widström E, et al. The healthcare system and the provision of oral healthcare in European Union member states. Part 9: Sweden. Br Dent J 2018;224(8):647–651. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.269.
  2. About the Swedish Public Dental Service. Folktandvården Sverige. Source: Swedish Municipalities and County Councils; 2016 ( service)
  3. Borzabadi-Farahani A. An insight into four orthodontic treatment need indices. Prog Orthod 2011;12:132–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.pio.2011.06.001.
  4. Bratthall D, Hänsel-Petersson G, et al. Reasons for the caries decline: what do the experts believe? Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:416–422.
  5. Opsahl Vital S, Haignere-Rubinstein C, et al. Caries risk and orthodontic treatment. Int Orthod 2010;8:28–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2009.12.003.
  6. Richter AE, Arruda AO, et al. Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;39:657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.037.
  7. Krasse B. Caries Risk. A Practical Guide for Assessment and Control. Chicago, London, Berlin: Quintessence Publ. Co Inc., 1985.
  8. Bratthall D. Dental caries: intervened-interrupted-interpreted. Concluding remarks and cariography. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104: 486–491.
  9. Sanpei S, Endo T, et al. Caries risk factors in children under treatment with sectional brackets. Angle Orthod 2010;80:509–514. DOI: 10.2319/072909-431.1.
  10. Tellez M, Gomez J, et al. Evidence on existing caries risk assessment systems: are they predictive of future caries? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2013;41:67–78. DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12003.
  11. Almosa NA, Lundgren T, et al. Diagnosing the severity of buccal caries lesions in orthodontic patients at de-bonding using digital photographs. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:474–480. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2013.865788.
  12. Galcerá Civera V, Almerich Silla JM, et al. Clinical and radiographic diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in a low risk population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007:12:252–257.
  13. Pontual AA, de Melo DP, et al. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:431–436. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/94985823.
  14. Klock B, Krasse B. A comparison between different methods for prediction of caries activity. Scand J Dent Res 1979;87:129–139.
  15. Hugoson A, Koch G, et al. Oral health of individuals aged 3 to 80 years in Jönköping, Sweden during 30 years (1973–2003). II. Review of clinical and radiographic findings. Swed Dent J 2005;29:139–155.
  16. Alm A, Wendt LK, et al. Prevalence of approximal caries in posterior teeth in 15-year-old Swedish teenagers in relation to their caries experience at 3 years of age. Caries Res 2007;41:392–398. DOI: 10.1159/000104798.
  17. Nordenram G. Dental health: Health in Sweden: The National Public Health Report 2012. Ch. 16. Scand J Public Health 2012;40(Suppl 9): 281–286. DOI: 10.1177/1403494812459620.
  18. Norderyd O, Koch G, et al. Oral health of individuals aged 3 to 80 years in Jönköping, Sweden during 40 years (1973–2013). II. Review of clinical and radiographic findings. Swed Den J 2015;39:69–86.
  19. Borzabadi-Farahani A, Eslamipour F, et al. Association between orthodontic treatment need and caries experience. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:2–11. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2010.516732.
  20. Cardoso CF, Drummond AF, et al. The Dental Aesthetic Index and dental health component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as tools in epidemiological studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011;8:3277–3286. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8083277.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.