Citation Information :
Jacob J, Paul M, Sara B, Steaphen P, Philip N, Mathew J. Comparative Analysis of Dentinal Crack Formation Following Root Canal Instrumentation with Hand K-Flex Files, ProTaper Next, and Self-adjusting Files. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (8):935-939.
Aim: To evaluate and compare in vitro the dentinal crack formation in root canal dentin after root canal instrumentation with hand K-Flex files, ProTaper Next, and self-adjusting engine-driven files.
Materials and methods: Ninety-two human mandibular first molar teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 23) as per the instrumentation protocol: group I—unprepared teeth (control); group II—hand K-Flex files (Sybron Endo); group III—ProTaper Next X1 and X2 (Dentsply Maillefer); group IV—self-adjusting file (ReDent Nova, Israel). All the roots were sectioned perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth at 9 mm, 6 mm, and 3 mm from the apex and thereby obtaining sixty-nine samples, which were then subjected to a stereomicroscopic examination for detection of dentinal cracks. Statistical analyses were done using the Chi-square test with SPSS (version 19), and p value was set at p < 0.05.
Results: Statistically significant differences were seen between the instrumented groups. No dentinal cracks were found in the unprepared roots and those prepared with hand K-Flex files (0/23). Self-adjusting-file-instrumented group showed significantly less incidence of crack formation when compared to the ProTaper Next group with p = 0.001.
Conclusion: Self-adjusting file is an efficient engine-driven NiTi instrument for root canal instrumentation with the least occurrence of crack formation in the root canal dentin compared to the ProTaper Next system.
Clinical significance: The introduction of NiTi rotary file systems has metamorphosed the endodontic treatment by their better cutting efficiency and cleaning potentiality. Yet, evidenced-based clinical studies are to be conducted on the incidence of microfractures that can lead to vertical root fractures, which will be produced irrespective of the motion kinematics and design feature and thereby compromising the clinical maintenance of the endodontically treated teeth.
Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30(8):559–567. DOI: 10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D.
Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, et al. Dentinal micro crack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the Self-Adjusting File. J Endod 2012;38(2):232–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.011.
Johnson E, Lloyd A, et al. Comparison between a novel nickel-Titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;34:1406–1409. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.029.
Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper endodontic system: geometries, features and guidelines for use. Dent Today 2001;20:6–7.
Metzger Z, Bassarani B, et al. Instruments, Materials and devices. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves K. ed. Philadelphia, PA: Cohen's Pathwaysofthe Pulp. Elsevier; 2010.
Priya NT, Chandrasekhar V, et al. Dentinal micro cracks after root canal preparation a comparative evaluation with hand, rotary and reciprocating instrumentation. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(12):70–72. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/11437.5349.
Kim HC, Lee MH, et al. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture. J Endod 2010;36(7):1195–1199. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.010.
Lam PP, Palamara JE, et al. Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparation by hand and rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2005;31:529–532. DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000150947.90682.a0.
Bier CA, Shemesh H, et al. The ability of different nickel titanium instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod 2009;35(2):236–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.021.
Milani AS, Froughreyhani M, et al. The effect of root canal preparation on the development of dentin cracks. Iran Endod J 2012;7(4): 177–182.
Hin ES, Wu MK, et al. Effects of Self adjusting file, Mtwo and ProTaper on the root canal wall. J Endod 2013;39(2):262–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.020.
Yigit DH, Aydemir S, et al. Evaluation of dentinal defect formation after root canal preparation with two reciprocating systems and hand instruments: an in vitro study. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 2015;29(2):368–373. DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2014.996982.
Garg S, Mahajan P, et al. Comparison of dentinal damage induced by different nickel-titanium rotary instruments during canal preparation. J Conserv Dent 2015;18(4):302–305. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.159730.
Capar ID, Arslan H, et al. Effects of ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal and HyFlex Instruments on crack formation in dentin. J Endod 2014;40(9):1482–1484. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.026.
Shori DD, Shenoi PR, et al. Steriomicroscopic evaluation of dentinal defects introduced by new rotary system: “ProTaper Next”. J Consev Dent 2015;18(3):210–213. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.154045.
Adorno CG, Yoshioka T, et al. The effect of root preparation technique and instrumentation length on the development of apical root cracks. J Endod 2009;35(4):389–392. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.008.
Metzger Z, Teperovich E, et al. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1: Respecting the root canal anatomy-A new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod 2010;36(4):679–690. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.036.
Hof R, Perevalov V, et al. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 2: Mechanical analysis. J Endod 2010;36(4):691–696. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009. 12.028.
Peters OA, Paque F. Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2011;37:53–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.047.
Soros C, Zinelis S, et al. Spreader load required for vertical root fracture during lateral compaction ex vivo: evaluation of periodontal simulation and fracture load information. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:64–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.027.