The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Chemical Characterization of Denture Base Resin with a Novel Cycloaliphatic Monomer

Sampathkumar JayaKrishnaKumar, Gunaseelaraj Rajkumar, Sengottaiyan Arul Kumar, Radhakrishnan Geethakumari

Keywords : Copolymer, Cycloaliphatic compound, Monomer, Modified monomer

Citation Information : JayaKrishnaKumar S, Rajkumar G, Kumar SA, Geethakumari R. Chemical Characterization of Denture Base Resin with a Novel Cycloaliphatic Monomer. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (8):940-946.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2634

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to identify and characterize newly formed copolymers by modifying methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer by substituting cycloaliphatic monomer using Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy. Materials and methods: Heat-cure polymethyl methacrylate (HC-PMMA) experimental specimens were made by dissolving tricyclodecane dimethanol diacrylate (TCDDMDA) at 10% and 20% concentrations in commercially available MMA monomer. Specimens made without TCDDMDA served as the control. The specimen was then scrapped and mixed with dried potassium bromide (KBr) to form pellet. Each pellet was placed in a FTIR spectrometer and 10 scans were recorded with a spectral resolution of 4 cm1. A mean of scans was automatically processed and deduced by the system software and a final transmittance spectral graph was obtained for one specimen. Results: Three significant spectral differences exist between control and experimental groups. The first difference was the disappearance of weak peak at 1637.34 cm1 (alkenyl C=C stretch) in both experimental groups. The second difference was the appearance of new moderate broad peaks at 1482.25 cm1 and 1449.56 cm1 in both experimental groups which are attributed to the ring –CH2 asymmetric bending (C–H deformation) vibrations. The third difference was the appearance of another new weak peak at 1386.57 cm1 in both experimental groups. This new peak confirms the formation of a new structure of copolymer. Conclusion: TCDDMDA copolymerizes with MMA, thereby decreasing the uncured residual monomer in the polymerized specimens. Clinical significance: Copolymerization of TCDDMDA with MMA would lead to the development of new monomeric composition for the fabrication of dentures possessing better mechanical properties and biocompatibility.


PDF Share
  1. Ranganath LM, Shet RGK, et al. The effect of fiber reinforcement on the dimensional changes of polymethyl methacrylate resin after processing and after immersion in water: An in-vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011 Jul-Aug;12(4):305–317. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1051.
  2. Anderson GC, Schulte JK, et al. Dimensional stability of injection and conventional processing of denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1988 Sept;60(3):394–398. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90292-2.
  3. Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of dental materials, 10th ed., USA: WB Saunders Company; 1996. pp. 237–272.
  4. Becker CM, Smith DE, et al. The comparison of denture base processing techniques. Part II. Dimensional change due to processing. J Prosthet Dent 1977 Apr;37(4):450–459. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(77)90147-0.
  5. Craig RG, O'Brien WJ, et al. Dental-materials properties and manipulation, 4th ed., St Louis, USA: CV Mosby Co; 1990. pp. 272–296.
  6. Dabreo EL, Herman P. A new method of measuring dimensional change. J Prosthet Dent 1991 May;65(5):718–722. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90212-F.
  7. Degee AJ, Tenharkel EC, et al. Measuring procedure for the determination of the three-dimensional shape of dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1979 Aug;42(2):149–153. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90164-1.
  8. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, et al. Linear dimensional variability of three denture base resins after processing and in water storage. J Prosthet Dent 1992 July;68(1):196–200. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90304-S.
  9. Garfunkel E. Evaluation of dimensional change in complete denture processed by injection-pressing and the pack- and-press technique. J Prosthet Dent 1983 Dec;50(6):757–761. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90085-9.
  10. Hardy F. Comparison of fluid resin and compression molding methods in processing dimensional change. J Prosthet Dent 1978 Apr;39(4):375–377. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80150-4.
  11. Firtell DN, Green AJ, et al. Posterior peripheral seal distortional related to processing temperature. J Prosthet Dent 1981 June;45(6):598–601. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(81)90418-2.
  12. Jagger DC, Harrison A, et al. The reinforcement of dentures. J Oral Rehab 1996;26:185–194. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00375.x.
  13. Rodford R. The development of high impact strength denture-base materials. J Dent 1986;14:214–217. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(86)90004-7.
  14. Vallittu PK. A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont 1996 Dec;5:270–276. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00511.x.
  15. Ajay R, Suma K, et al. Monomer modifications of denture base acrylic resin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2019 May;11:S112–S125. DOI: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_34_19.
  16. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, et al. Phillips’ science of dental materials, 12th ed., St. Louis, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2013. pp. 522.
  17. Mahfooz AM, Alammari MR. The use of Fournier Transform Infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopic analysis and cell viability assay to assess pre-polymerizes CAD/CAM acrylic resin denture base materials. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci 2018;7(2):111–118.
  18. Al-Ali AAS, Kassab-Bashi TY. Fournier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of new copolymers of acrylic denture base materials. Int J Enhanced Res Sci Tech Eng 2015 Apr;4(4):172–180.
  19. Rodriguez LS, Paleari AG, et al. Chemical characterization and flexural strength of a denture base acrylic resin with monomer 2-tert-butylaminoethyl methacrylate. J Prosthodont 2013;22:292–297. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00942.x.
  20. Spasojevic P, Zrilic M, et al. The mechanical properties of a poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base material modified with dimethyl itaconate and di-n-butyl itaconate. Int J Polymer Sci 2015;June;2015: 1–9. DOI: 10.1155/2015/561012.
  21. Durner J, Obermaier J, et al. Correlation of the degree of conversion with the amount of elutable substances in nano-hybrid dental composites. Dent Mater 2012;28:1146–1153. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.006.
  22. Miletic VJ, Santini A. Remaining unreacted methacrylate groups in resin-based composite with respect to sample preparation and storing conditions using micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: ApplBiomater 2008;87B:468–474. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31128.
  23. Deepak VD, Rajan J, et al. Hydrogen bonding and rate enhancement in the photoinduced polymerization of telechelic urethane methacrylates based on a cycloaliphatic system: tricyclodecane dimethanol. J PolymSci Part A: PolymChem 2006;44:4384–4395.
  24. Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of dental materials, 11th ed., St. Louis, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2003. pp. 162–164.
  25. Endo T, Finger WJ, et al. Surface texture and roughness of polished nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Dent Mater J 2010;29(2):213–223. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2009-019.
  26. Frauscher KE, Ilie N. Depth of cure and mechanical properties of nano-hybrid resin-based composites with novel and conventional matrix formulation. Clin Oral Invest 2012 Dec;16:1425–1434. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0647-3.
  27. Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J 2011;56(1 Suppl):59–66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01296.x.
  28. Marchesi G, Breschi L, et al. Contraction stress of low-shrinkage composite materials assessed with different testing systems. Dent Mater 2010;26:947–953. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.007.
  29. Schimdt C, Ilie N. The mechanical stability of nano-hybrid composites with new methacrylate monomers for matrix compositions. Dent Mater 2012;28:152–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.007.
  30. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10993-18.Biological Evaluation of medical devices – Part 18: Chemical characterization of materials. British Standards: ISO; 2009.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.