Citation Information :
Gubrellay P, Karia M, Talesara K, Sharma C, Raghav S, Sujatha P. Effect of Dentin Bonding Agent on Intrapulpal Temperature during Fabrication of Provisional Restorations by a Direct Method: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (8):947-951.
Aim: To determine the effect of three different provisional restorative materials (PRMs) and application of dentin bonding agent (DBA) on intrapulpal temperature rise during fabrication of provisional crowns using a direct method.
Materials and methods: Three PRMs—polymethyl methacrylate resin (PMMA), bis-acrylic resin, and dimethyl methacrylate resin (DMMA)—were used in the study. Dentin bonding agent (Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, Germany) was applied in a single layer or double layer as an insulating material. A total of 45 molars were prepared for complete coverage restoration with chamfer finish line and 1.5 mm axial and 2 mm occlusal reduction. After application of a single or double layer of DBA, provisional materials were polymerized according to the manufacturer\'s instructions. The temperature increase inside the pulp chamber was measured with a T-type thermocouple wire. The readings were averaged for each group to determine the mean value of temperature rise.
Results: Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc Tukey test (a = 0.05). The temperature rise varied according to the provisional restoration material used (PMMA > DMMA > bis-acrylic resin) (p < 0.001) and the single or double layer of DBA (p < 0.001). Polymethyl methacrylate resin produced a higher intrapulpal temperature.
Conclusion: Application of a double layer of DBA resulted in a significantly lower intrapulpal temperature.
American Prosthodontic Society. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(1):10–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013.
Michalakis K, Pissiotis A, et al. Comparison of temperature increase in the pulp chamber during the polymerization of materials used for the direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:418–423. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.005.
Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, et al. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 3rd ed., Chicago quintessence; 1997. pp. 225–256.
Kim SH, Watts DC. Exotherm behaviors of the polymer-based provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dent Mater 2004;20:383–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.001.
Grajower R, Shaharbani S, et al. Temperature rise in pulp chamber during fabrication of temporary self-curing resin crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:535–540. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90088-X.
Moulding MB, Loney RW. The effect of cooling techniques on intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:332–336.
Moulding MB, Teplitsky PE. Intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:299–304.
Gurbulak AG, Kilic K, et al. The effect of dentin desensitizer with different layers on thermal changes on the pulp during fabrication of provisional restoration. J Biomed Mater Res B 2009;91B:362–365. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31410.
Burns DR, Beck DA, et al. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: Report of the committee of research in fixed prosthodontics of the academy of fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474–497. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2.
Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH. Temperature rise in pulpal chamber during fabrication of provisional resinous crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:441–416. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70057-X.
Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 1965;19:515–530. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(65)90015-0.
Nyborg H, Brannstrom M. Pulp reaction to heat. J Prosthet Dent 1968;19:605–612. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(68)90262-X.
Driscoll CF, Woolsey G, et al. Comparison of exothermic release during polymerization of four materials used to fabricate interim restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:504–506. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90289-9.
Goodis HE, White JM, et al. Measurement of temperature generated by visible light-cure lamps in an in-vitro model. Dent Mater 1989;5:230–234. DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(89)90066-3.
Tjan AH, Grant BE, et al. Temperature rise in the pulp chamber during fabrication of provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:622–626. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90578-7.
Mausner IK, Goldstein GR, et al. Effect of two dentinal desensitizing agents on retention complete cast coping using four cements. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:129–134. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96) 90088-8.
Akova T, Ozkomur A, et al. Intrapulpal heat generation during provisionalization: effect of desensitizer and matrix type. J Prosthodont 2008;17:108–113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00257.x.
Voti ED, Phillips RW, et al. Thermal Diffusion through Amalgam and Various Liners. J Dent Res 1966;45(4):1184–1190. DOI: 10.1177/00220345660450042501.
Usumez A, Ozturk AN, et al. The effect of dentin desensitizers on thermal changes in the pulp chamber during fabrication of provisional restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:579–584. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01281.x.