The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effect of Dentin Bonding Agent on Intrapulpal Temperature during Fabrication of Provisional Restorations by a Direct Method: An In Vitro Study

Priyanka Gubrellay, Milap Karia, Kunal Talesara, Chetan Sharma, Shubhra Raghav, Paranna Sujatha

Keywords : Dentin bonding agent, Dentinal tubules, Desensitizing agents, Provisional restoration

Citation Information : Gubrellay P, Karia M, Talesara K, Sharma C, Raghav S, Sujatha P. Effect of Dentin Bonding Agent on Intrapulpal Temperature during Fabrication of Provisional Restorations by a Direct Method: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (8):947-951.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2624

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To determine the effect of three different provisional restorative materials (PRMs) and application of dentin bonding agent (DBA) on intrapulpal temperature rise during fabrication of provisional crowns using a direct method. Materials and methods: Three PRMs—polymethyl methacrylate resin (PMMA), bis-acrylic resin, and dimethyl methacrylate resin (DMMA)—were used in the study. Dentin bonding agent (Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, Germany) was applied in a single layer or double layer as an insulating material. A total of 45 molars were prepared for complete coverage restoration with chamfer finish line and 1.5 mm axial and 2 mm occlusal reduction. After application of a single or double layer of DBA, provisional materials were polymerized according to the manufacturer's instructions. The temperature increase inside the pulp chamber was measured with a T-type thermocouple wire. The readings were averaged for each group to determine the mean value of temperature rise. Results: Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc Tukey test (a = 0.05). The temperature rise varied according to the provisional restoration material used (PMMA > DMMA > bis-acrylic resin) (p < 0.001) and the single or double layer of DBA (p < 0.001). Polymethyl methacrylate resin produced a higher intrapulpal temperature. Conclusion: Application of a double layer of DBA resulted in a significantly lower intrapulpal temperature.

HTML PDF Share
  1. American Prosthodontic Society. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(1):10–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013.
  2. Michalakis K, Pissiotis A, et al. Comparison of temperature increase in the pulp chamber during the polymerization of materials used for the direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:418–423. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.005.
  3. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, et al. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 3rd ed., Chicago quintessence; 1997. pp. 225–256.
  4. Kim SH, Watts DC. Exotherm behaviors of the polymer-based provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dent Mater 2004;20:383–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.001.
  5. Grajower R, Shaharbani S, et al. Temperature rise in pulp chamber during fabrication of temporary self-curing resin crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:535–540. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90088-X.
  6. Moulding MB, Loney RW. The effect of cooling techniques on intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:332–336.
  7. Moulding MB, Teplitsky PE. Intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:299–304.
  8. Gurbulak AG, Kilic K, et al. The effect of dentin desensitizer with different layers on thermal changes on the pulp during fabrication of provisional restoration. J Biomed Mater Res B 2009;91B:362–365. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31410.
  9. Burns DR, Beck DA, et al. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: Report of the committee of research in fixed prosthodontics of the academy of fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474–497. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2.
  10. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH. Temperature rise in pulpal chamber during fabrication of provisional resinous crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:441–416. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70057-X.
  11. Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 1965;19:515–530. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(65)90015-0.
  12. Langeland K, Langeland LK. Pulp reactions to crown preparation, impression, temporary crown fixation, and permanent cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1965;15:129–143. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(65)90073-9.
  13. Nyborg H, Brannstrom M. Pulp reaction to heat. J Prosthet Dent 1968;19:605–612. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(68)90262-X.
  14. Driscoll CF, Woolsey G, et al. Comparison of exothermic release during polymerization of four materials used to fabricate interim restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:504–506. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90289-9.
  15. Goodis HE, White JM, et al. Measurement of temperature generated by visible light-cure lamps in an in-vitro model. Dent Mater 1989;5:230–234. DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(89)90066-3.
  16. Tjan AH, Grant BE, et al. Temperature rise in the pulp chamber during fabrication of provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:622–626. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90578-7.
  17. Mausner IK, Goldstein GR, et al. Effect of two dentinal desensitizing agents on retention complete cast coping using four cements. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:129–134. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96) 90088-8.
  18. Akova T, Ozkomur A, et al. Intrapulpal heat generation during provisionalization: effect of desensitizer and matrix type. J Prosthodont 2008;17:108–113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00257.x.
  19. Voti ED, Phillips RW, et al. Thermal Diffusion through Amalgam and Various Liners. J Dent Res 1966;45(4):1184–1190. DOI: 10.1177/00220345660450042501.
  20. Usumez A, Ozturk AN, et al. The effect of dentin desensitizers on thermal changes in the pulp chamber during fabrication of provisional restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:579–584. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01281.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.