The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of the Treatment Complexity with Single Complete Removable Denture: A Cross-sectional Study in Tunisia

Sana Bekri, Amel Labidi, Yosra Mabrouk, Hiba Triki, Lamia Mansour, Kamel B Salem

Keywords : Complaints, Patient satisfaction, Quality assessment, Single complete removable denture

Citation Information : Bekri S, Labidi A, Mabrouk Y, Triki H, Mansour L, Salem KB. Evaluation of the Treatment Complexity with Single Complete Removable Denture: A Cross-sectional Study in Tunisia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (8):957-962.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2621

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the complaints of patients wearing single complete removable dentures (SCRDs), to evaluate their satisfaction degree, and to identify the main construction faults committed. Materials and methods: One hundred patients with SCRDs were included. A questionnaire was prepared to investigate the patients’ complaints and satisfaction. This questionnaire was supplemented by a professional examination of dentures. Results: Loss of retention and chewing difficulties were the most common complaints of the patients. Examination of the complete dentures by a professional in removable prosthodontics has shown prosthetic instability, lack of retention, and poor adaptation of the prosthetic bases in 49%, 42%, and 38% of the cases, respectively. Occlusal errors related to balanced occlusion, occlusal plane orientation, and occlusal vertical dimension were found successively in 41%, 37%, and 27% of the examined dentures, respectively. Sixty-three percent of the patients were overall dissatisfied with their dentures. This dissatisfaction was correlated to the quality of the denture (p < 103). Conclusion: The complaints expressed by the patients with their dentures are mostly justified. The design of a single removable denture does not seem to be mastered by many practitioners.


PDF Share
  1. Gillett HW. Conservatism in partial prosthetic restorations. J Dent Res 1923;5(2):lxix–xcvii. DOI: 10.1177/00220345230050020301.
  2. Sharry JJ. Complete denture prosthodontics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co; 1962.
  3. Jorgensen Ejvind B, Mojon P. The edentulous patient: epidemiology. Real Clin 1997;8(4):359–367.
  4. Statistics Tunisia, National Institute of Statistics [En ligne] 2016. available: http://www.ins.tn/sites/default/files/publication/pdf/Bulletin%20n%C2%B01-2016-v3.pdf.
  5. Bilhan H, Geckili O, et al. Evaluation of satisfaction and complications in patients with existing complete dentures. J Oral Sci 2013;55(1): 29–37. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.55.29.
  6. Sheppard IM, Schwartz LR, et al. Oral status of edentulous and complete denture-wearing patients. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;83(3): 614–620. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1971.0376.
  7. Bilhan H, Erdogan O, et al. Complication rates and patient satisfaction with removable dentures. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4(2):109–115. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.109.
  8. Ashraf H. To determine the influence of complete denture prosthesis on masticatory muscle activity in elderly patients-an in vivo study. Int J Prosthet Rest Dent 2011;1(1):35–40.
  9. Brunello DL, Mandikos MN. Construction faults, age, gender, and relative medical health: factors associated with complaints in complete denture patients. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79(5):545–554. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70176-3.
  10. Smith J, Hughes D. A survey of referred patients experiencing problems with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60(5): 583–586. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90218-1.
  11. Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, et al. Insertion and follow-up of complete dentures: a literature review. Gerodontology 2011;28(3):197–204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00368.x.
  12. Laurina L, Soboleva U. Construction faults associated with complete denture wearers' complaints. Stomatologija 2006;8(2):61–64.
  13. Mbodj EB, Cueye M, et al. Do single maxillary dentures age better than bimaxillary complete dentures? Strat Proth 2015;15(3):181–185.
  14. Driscoll CF, Masri RM. Single maxillary complete denture. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48(3):567–583. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2004.03.003.
  15. Naik AV. Complete denture fractures: A clinical study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2009;9(3):148. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.57084.
  16. Khasawneh SF, Arab JM. A clinical study of complete denture fractures at four military hospitals in Jordan. JRMS 2003;10(2):27–31.
  17. Koper A. The maxillary complete denture opposing natural teeth: Problems and some solutions. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57(6):704–707. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90367-2.
  18. Jagger D, Harrison A, et al. The reinforcement of dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(3):185–194. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00375.x.
  19. Mattie PA, Phoenix RD. A precise design and fabrication method for metal base maxillary complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76(5):496–499. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90007-4.
  20. Hüe O, Berteretche M. The occlusal plane in single – arch complete prosthodontics. Real Clin 1997;8(4):423–433.
  21. Hobkirk JA. Loss of the vertical dimension of occlusion and its management implications. Int J Prosthodont 2008;22(5):520–521.
  22. Čelebić A, Knezović-Zlatarić D, et al. Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58(10):948–953. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/58.10.M948.
  23. Berg E. Acceptance of full dentures. Int Dent J 1993;43(3):299–306.
  24. Narain U, Garg R, et al. A Prospective Study Of The Quality Of Removable Prostheses And Patients’ Satisfaction In Post-Prosthetic Phase. Internet J Dent Sci 2010;9(1):1–7.
  25. Diehl RL, Foerster U, et al. Factors associated with successful denture therapy. J Prosthodontics 1996;5(2):84–90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00279.x.
  26. Akeel RF. Effect of the quality of removable prostheses on patient satisfaction. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10(6):E057–E064. DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-6-57.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.