The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 20 , ISSUE 9 ( September, 2019 ) > List of Articles


An Evaluation of Er:YAG Laser in an Intact Enamel Treatment on Bonding to the Resin Cement Compared to Four Traditional Techniques

Yara Mohammad, Oula Yassin, Louis Hardan, Omar Hamadah, Mohammad Tamer Abbara

Keywords : Acid etching, Air abrasion, Enamel treatment, Er:YAG laser

Citation Information : Mohammad Y, Yassin O, Hardan L, Hamadah O, Abbara MT. An Evaluation of Er:YAG Laser in an Intact Enamel Treatment on Bonding to the Resin Cement Compared to Four Traditional Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (9):1014-1018.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2647

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-09-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Aim of study: Evaluation of the bond strength of the resin cement after enamel conditioning with erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser compared to other four different techniques. Materials and methods: The study consisted of 50 enamel specimens excluded from the smooth surfaces of newly extracted human 3rd molars. The specimens were randomly divided into five groups in terms of the enamel treatment technique. Each group (n = 10) was conditioned differently by bevel and acid etching group (I), acid etching technique group (II), double acid etching technique group (III), air abrasion followed by acid etching group (IV), and Er:YAG laser followed by acid etching group (V). After enamel treatment, a resin cylinder was installed using split Teflon matrix on each enamel specimen. Then the specimens were exposed to a shear strength device, and shear force was applied. The results were recorded with Newton. The required data were collected and statistically analyzed. A one-way ANOVA test was conducted to compare the five study groups using SPSS version 21 (p < 0.05). Results: All groups showed high shear bond strength values ranging from 19.26 MPa (for group III) to 27.05 MPa (for group V). The enamel treatment with Er:YAG laser followed by acid etching gave the best results with significant differences compared to the other groups. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that the combination between the Er:YAG laser and the acid etching enhances the bond strength of resin cement with the enamel. Clinical significance: The use of Er:YAG laser followed by acid etching can be a successful technique for enamel conditioning and the results showed their superiority over the other groups.

PDF Share
  1. Alavi S, Birang R, et al. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets after acid-etched and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser-etched. Dent Res J 2014;11(3):321–326.
  2. Sfondrini M, Calderoni G, et al. Is laser conditioning a valid alternative to conventional etching for aesthetic brackets. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2018;19:61–66. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-017-0321-9.
  3. Giannini M, Makishi P, et al. Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J 2015;26(1):3–10. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201302442.
  4. Bevilacqua L, Cadenaro M, et al. Influence of air abrasion and etching on enamel and adaptation of a dental sealant. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2007;8(1):25–30.
  5. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, et al. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005;24(1):1–13. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.24.1.
  6. Kim M-E, Jeoung D-J, et al. Effects of water flow on dental hard tissue ablation using Er: YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2003;21(3):139–144. DOI: 10.1089/104454703321895581.
  7. Bertrand M-F, Brulat N, et al. Er: YAG laser cavity preparation and semi-direct composite resin restoration: a microleakage study. Photomed Laser Surg 2008;26(5):473–477. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2007.2182.
  8. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, et al. Ablation depths and morphological changes in human enamel and dentin after Er: YAG laser irradiation with or without water mist. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999;17(3):105–109. DOI: 10.1089/clm.1999.17.105.
  9. Martínez-Insua A, da Silva Dominguez L, et al. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er: YAG-laser–treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84(3):280–288. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000.108600.
  10. Bevilácqua FM, Zezell DM, et al. Fluoride uptake and acid resistance of enamel irradiated with Er: YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci 2008;23(2): 141–147. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-007-0466-6.
  11. Dilber E, Ozturk AN. Bond strength of porcelain bonded to enamel and dentin surfaces prepared with different surface treatments. J Adhes 2015;91(8):651–662. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2014.959937.
  12. Gerbo LR, Lacefield WR, et al. The effect of enamel preparation on the tensile bond strength of orthodontic composite resin. Angle Orthod 1992;62(4):275–281.
  13. Canay Ş, Kocadereli I, et al. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117(1):15–19. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70243-5.
  14. Lasmar M, Reher V, et al. Enamel demineralization and bracket bond strength when etching with acid and/or Er: YAG laser. Aust Dent J 2012;57(2):190–195. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01679.x.
  15. Shah DD, Chandak M, et al. Comparing Shear Bond Strength of Two Step vs One Step B onding Agents on Ground Enamel and Dentin: An in vitro Study. Int J Exp Dent Sci 2014;3(1):1–3.
  16. Farias-Neto A, Gomes EMdCF, et al. Esthetic Rehabilitation of the smile with no-prep porcelain laminates and partial veneers. Case Rep Dent 2015;2015:1–6. DOI: 10.1155/2015/452765.
  17. ZARoNe F, LeoNe R, et al. No-preparation ceramic veneers: a systematic review. J Osseointegration 2018;10(1):17–22.
  18. Mehdi S, Mano M-C, et al. Air abrasion of enamel. Orthod Fr 2009;80:179–192. DOI: 10.1051/orthodfr/2009012.
  19. Ellis RW, Latta MA, et al. Effect of air abrasion and acid etching on sealant retention: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 1999;21(6):316–319.
  20. Moslemi M, Erfanparast L, et al. The effect of Er, Cr: YSGG laser and air abrasion on shear bond strength of a fissure sealant to enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141(2):157–161. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0133.
  21. Sallam RA, Arnout EA. Effect of Er: YAG laser etching on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket. Saudi Med J 2018;39(9):922–927. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2018.9.22793.
  22. Sharma S, Hegde MN, et al. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Conventional and Minimal Invasive Method of Cavity Preparation in Mandibular Molars. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 2018;9(6):170–175. DOI: 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00544.2.
  23. Osorio R, Toledano M, et al. Bracket bonding with 15-or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding. Angle Orthod 1999;69(1):45–48.
  24. Sasaki LH, Lobo PD, et al. Tensile bond strength and SEM analysis of enamel etched with Er: YAG laser and phosphoric acid: a comparative study in vitro. Braz Dent J 2008;19(1):57–61.
  25. Cecchini RCM, Zezell DM, et al. Effect of Er: YAG laser on enamel acid resistance: Morphlogical and atomic spectrometry analysis. Lasers Surg Med 2005;37(5):366–372. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20247.
  26. Castellan CS, Luiz AC, et al. In vitro evaluation of enamel demineralization after Er: YAG and Nd: YAG laser irradiation on primary teeth. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25(2):85–90. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2006.2043.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.