The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Degree of Conversion of Nanoceramic and Microhybrid Composites Activated by Different Polymerization Modes at Different Intervals: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Yasser M Al-Qahatani, Mohammed Al-Omari, Shibu T Mathew, Mohammed A Al-Qarni

Keywords : Ceram X, Degree of conversion, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, Spectrum TPH

Citation Information : Al-Qahatani YM, Al-Omari M, Mathew ST, Al-Qarni MA. Degree of Conversion of Nanoceramic and Microhybrid Composites Activated by Different Polymerization Modes at Different Intervals: An In Vitro Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (1):22-27.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2713

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-01-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Introduction: This is an in vitro study to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) of nanoceramic and microhybrid composites activated by different polymerization modes at different intervals. Aim: To determine the DC of two resin composites at different time intervals and modes of polymerization on DC. Materials and methods: Two commercially available composite resins—nanoceramic (Ceram X, Dentsply) and microhybrid (Spectrum TPH, Dentsply)—were used in this study. A total of 80 cylindrical samples (n = 40 each) were made by packing the composites in one increment into (5 × 2 mm) Teflon molds and cured using a light-emitting diode (LED) at an irradiance of 1,200 mW/cm2. Each group was further divided into two groups (n = 20) based on the curing modes (20 seconds, 40 seconds). These 20 samples were further subdivided (n = 10) based on the time interval (2 days, 7 days). Degree of conversion was assessed by Fourier-transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR) using a direct technique (attenuated total reflectance) on the top surface of the samples. Degree of conversion was measured for samples cured for 20 seconds (n = 10) and 40 seconds (n = 10) after 2 days and 7 days during which the samples were stored in an incubator at 37°C, 90% ± 10% relative humidity. The results obtained were statistically analyzed using two-way and three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and p value set at (<0.005) significance level. Results: Degree of conversion for the tested composites varied between 44% and 55% for Ceram X and 42% and 45% for Spectrum TPH. A significant difference was observed in DC for Ceram X samples for different polymerization modes (20 seconds and 40 seconds) as well as at 2–7 days measurement, whereas Spectrum TPH did not show any significant difference for polymerization modes. Conclusion: Ceram X demonstrated high DC values compared with that of Spectrum TPH with regard to two different polymerization modes. Clinical significance: Lesser the time required for conversion and less the residual monomer left, better is the prognosis of the restoration, and better is the patient satisfaction.

PDF Share
  1. Eliades GC, Vougiouklakis GJ, Caputo AA. Degree of double bond conversion in light-cured composites. Dent Mater 1987;3(1):19–25. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80055-6.
  2. Aravamudhan K, Floyd CJ, Rakowski D, et al. Light-emitting diode curing light irradiance and polymerization of the resin-based composite. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137(2):213–223. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0147.
  3. Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite JD. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two-time intervals. Dent Mater 2013;29(9):e213–e217. DOI: 10.1016/ 05.011.
  4. Rahiotis C, Kakaboura A, Loukidis M, et al. Curing efficiency of various types of light-curing units. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112(1):89–94. DOI: 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2004.00092.x.
  5. Silva EMD, Almeida GS, Poskus LT, et al. Relationship between the degree of conversion, solubility and salivary sorption of a hybrid and a nano filled resin composite. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16(2):161–166. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572008000200015.
  6. Truffier-Boutry D, Demoustier-Champagne S, Devaux J, et al. A physico-chemical explanation of the post-polymerization shrinkage in dental resins. Dent Mater 2006;22(5):405–412. DOI: 10.1016/
  7. Rueggeberg FA, Hashinger DT, Fairhurst CW. Calibration of FTIR conversion analysis of contemporary dental resin composites. Dent Mater 1990;6(4):241–249. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80005-3.
  8. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift Jr EJ. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125(6):687–701. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0113.
  9. Hervas-Garcia A, Martinez-Lozano MA, Cabanes-Vila J, et al. Composite resins. A review of the materials and clinical indications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11(2):E215–E220.
  10. Imazato S, Tarumi H, Kobayashi K, et al. Relationship between the degree of conversion and internal discoloration of light-activated composite. Dent Mater J 1995;14(1):23–30. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.14.23.
  11. Prasanna N, Pallavi Reddy Y, Kavitha S, et al. Degree of conversion and residual stress of preheated and room-temperature composites. Indian J Dent Sci 2007;18(4):173–176. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290. 35827.
  12. Jafarzadeh TS, Erfan M, Behroozibakhsh M, et al. Evaluation of polymerization efficacy in composite resins via FT-IR spectroscopy and Vickers microhardness test. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent 2015;9(4):226–232. DOI: 10.15171/joddd.2015.041.
  13. Ozturk B, Cobanoglu N, Cetin AR, et al. Conversion degrees of resin composites using different light sources. Eur J Dent 2013;7:102–109.
  14. Ribeiro BC, Boaventura JM, Brito-Goncalves J, et al. Degree of conversion of nanofilled and microhybrid composite resins photo-activated by different generations of LEDs. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;20(2):212–217. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572012000200015.
  15. Da Silva GR, Simamoto-Junior PC, da Mota AS, et al. Mechanical properties of light-curing composites polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. Dent Mater J 2007;26(2):217–223. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.217.
  16. Da Silva EM, Poskus LT, Guimaraes JG, et al. Influence of light polymerization modes on degree of conversion and crosslink density of dental composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19(3):1027–1032. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3220-5.
  17. Arikawa H, Fujii K, Kanie T, et al. Light transmittance characteristics of light-cured composite resins. Dent Mater 1998;14(6):405–411. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00014-7.
  18. Yoon TH, Lee YK, Lim BS, et al. Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(12): 1165–1173. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00970.x.
  19. Price RB, Rizkalla AS, Hall GC. Effect of stepped light exposure on the volumetric polymerization shrinkage and bulk modulus of dental composites and an unfilled resin. Am J Dent 2000;13(4):176–180.
  20. Rahiotis C, Patsouri K, Silikas N, et al. Curing efficiency of high-intensity light-emitting diode (LED) devices. J Oral Sci 2010;52(2):187–195. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.52.187.
  21. Rastelli ANS, Jacomassi DP, Bagnato VS. Effect of power densities and irradiation times on the degree of conversion and temperature increase of a microhybrid dental composite resin. Laser Phys 2008;18(9):1074–1079. DOI: 10.1134/S1054660X08090132.
  22. Yue C, Tantbirojn D, Grothe RL, et al. The depth of cure of clear versus opaque sealants as influenced by curing regimens. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140(3):331–338. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0163.
  23. Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts D. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000;16(4):292–296. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00020-8.
  24. Burtscher P. Stability of radicals in cured composite materials. Dent Mater 1993;9(4):218–221. DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90064-W.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.