The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Influence of the Coca-Cola Drinks on the Overall Color of Glazed or Polished Porcelain Veneers Fabricated from Different Materials and Thicknesses: An In Vitro Study

Hadeel K Abdalkadeer, Samaher M Almarshedy, Nasser M Al Ahmari, Mohammed M Al Moaleem, Abdullah A Aldosari, Nabiel A Al Ghazali

Keywords : Coca-Cola, Color, Porcelain veneers

Citation Information : Abdalkadeer HK, Almarshedy SM, Al Ahmari NM, Al Moaleem MM, Aldosari AA, Al Ghazali NA. Influence of the Coca-Cola Drinks on the Overall Color of Glazed or Polished Porcelain Veneers Fabricated from Different Materials and Thicknesses: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (1):56-61.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2705

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-01-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of the current study is to assess the influence of Coca-Cola drinks on the overall color of glazed or polished porcelain veneers fabricated of three different porcelain systems and two different thicknesses. Materials and methods: A total of 96 ceramic disk specimens were fabricated. The ceramic veneers were prepared to a standardized thickness of 1.0 mm ± 0.025 mm and 0.6 ± 0.025 (48 samples each group) using the following ceramic systems: Zircon, E-max press, and E-max CAD/CAM. Veneer samples from each system were divided into two subgroups (n = 8). First subgroup samples were glazed according to the manufacturer\'s instructions, and the other subgroup samples were adjusted with diamond burs then polished with ceramic polishing kit. Color was measured with Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer. Then all samples immersed with Cola drink, for 4 weeks, in a thermocycling machine and then the color were measured again and color change was recorded. Results: Significant differences in color change were noticed before and after immersing with Coca-Cola and thermocycling for all materials and thicknesses used (p < 0.01). Significant differences in color changes were noticed between glazed and polished samples (p < 0.001). No significant differences in color change were noticed when using different thicknesses for all materials used (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Different porcelain materials have shown significant color changes after immersing and thermocycling in Coca-Cola drinks. The color changes of polished porcelain specimens were more considerable than those of polished specimens for all porcelain materials and thicknesses used. This suggests reglazing of all esthetic restoration after any adjustments might be performed and before final cementation in an attempt to maintain the color stability in oral environment. Clinical significance: To achieve a perfect color stability of ceramic veneers, clinicians should take into consideration the possible color deviations that might result after any adjustment followed by polishing procedures to the ceramic surface. And, it is always preferable to do reglazing of porcelain restorations after any surface treatments and before final cementation.


PDF Share
  1. Joiner A. Tooth color: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004;32(Suppl 1): 3–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.013.
  2. Leinfelder KF. Porcelain esthetics for the 21st century. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(Suppl):47–51. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0402.
  3. Dietschi D. Layering concepts in anterior composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(1):71–80.
  4. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75(1):18–32. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90413-8.
  5. Carlsson GE, Wagner IV, Odman P, et al. An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer aided image manipulation. Inte J Prosthodontics 1998;11(3):246–254.
  6. Davis LG, Ashworth PD, Spriggs LS. Psychological effects of aesthetic dental treatment. J Dent 1998;26(7):547–554. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00031-6.
  7. McLaren EA, LeSage B. Feldspathic veneers: what are their indications? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32(3):44–49.
  8. Douglas R. Color stability of new generation indirect resins for prosthodontic application. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(2):166–170. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80008-6.
  9. Singh K, Suvarna S, Agnihotri Y, et al. Color stability of aesthetic restorative materials. Euro J Prosthodontics 2014;2(1):15–22. DOI: 10.4103/2347-4610.122989.
  10. Fehmer V, Mühlemann S, Hämmerle CHF, et al. Criteria for the selection of restoration materials. Quintessence Int 2014;45(9): 723–730 Originally published in Quintessence Zahntech 2013;39(4):462–470. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a32509.
  11. Kursoglu P, Karagoz Motro PF, Kazazoglu E. Correlation of surface texture with the stainability of ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(2):306–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.028.
  12. Goldstein GR, Barnhard BR, Penugonda B. Profilometer, SEM, and visual assessment of porcelain polishing methods. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65(5):627–634. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90196-4.
  13. Gupta R, Prakash H, Shah N, et al. Spectrophotometric evaluation of color changes of various tooth colored veneering materials after exposure to commonly consumed beverages. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2005;5:72–78. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.16873.
  14. Motro PF, Kursoglu P, Kazazoglu E. Effect of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108(4):231–237. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60168-1.
  15. Fuzzi M, Zaccheroni Z, Vallania G. Scanning electron microscopy and profilometer evaluation of glazed and polished dental porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9(5):452–458.
  16. Al-Wahadni A, Martin DM. Glazing and finishing dental porcelain: a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 1998;64(8):580–583.
  17. Van Noort R. Introduction to dental materials, 4th ed., Edinburgh: Mosby; 2013. pp. 191–197.
  18. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, et al. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115(1):71–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.014.
  19. Sarikaya I, Güler AU. Effects of different surface treatments on the color stability of various dental porcelainsy. J Dent Science 2011;6(2):65–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2011.03.001.
  20. Hamza TA, Alameldin AA, Elkouedi AY, et al. Effect of artificial accelerated aging on surface roughness and color stability of different ceramic restorations. Stomatological Dis Sci 2017;1:8–13. DOI: 10.20517/2573-0002.2016.05.
  21. Colombo M, Cavallo M, Miegge M, et al. Color stability of CAD/CAM Zirconia ceramics following exposure to acidic and staining drinks. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(11):1297–1303. DOI: 10.4317/jced.54404.
  22. Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, et al. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:417–422. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.6.417.
  23. Saba DA, Salama RA, Haridy R. Effect of different beverages on the color stability and microhardness of CAD/CAM hybrid vs feldspathic ceramic blocks: an in vitro study. Future Dent J 2017;3:61–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.fdj.2017.07.001.
  24. Nikzada N, Azarib A, Poursinac M. Effects of beverage colorants and accelerated aging on the color stability of indirect resin composites. J Dent Sci 2012;7(3):231–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.006.
  25. Hosoya Y. Five-year color changes of light-cured resin composites: influence of light-curing times. Dent Mate 1999;15(4):268–274. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00046-9.
  26. Alghazali N, Burnside G, Smith PW, et al. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth. J Dent 2012;40(Suppl 1):10–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.023.
  27. Arocha MA, Mayoral JR, Lefever D, et al. Color stability of siloranes vs methacrylate-based composites after immersion in staining solutions. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17(6):1481e–1487e. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0837-7.
  28. Ozarslan MM, Büyükkaplan US, Barutcigil Ç, et al. Effects of different surface finishing procedures on the change in surface roughness and color of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network material. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8(1):16–20. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.16.
  29. Vallittu PK, Vallittu ASJ, Lassila VP. Dental aesthetics—a survey of attitudes in different groups of patients. J Dent 1996;24(5):335–338. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00079-8.
  30. Zissis Y, Coroni P. Color stability of provisional resin restorative material. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(5):533–539. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70028-9.
  31. Amaral FL, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, et al. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19(6):340–353. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00134.x.
  32. Rajbaran S, Dannheimer M, De Wet F. The effect of thermocycling on the determination of microleakage in Permite amalgam restorations. SADJ 2009;64(9):394–396.
  33. Han GJ, Kim JH, Lee MA, et al. Performance of a novel polishing rubber wheel in improving surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain. Dent Mater J 2014;33(6):739–748. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2013-289.
  34. Bassir M, Rezvani MB, Golzari H, et al. Effect of two polishing systems on surface roughness, topography, and flexural strength of a monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. J Prosthodont 2019;28(1): e172–e180. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12586.
  35. Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, et al. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the color of ceramic systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2007;97(1):25–31.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.