The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Patients’ Preferences on Different Types of Esthetic Treatment in Saudi Arabia

Fatima L Al Otaibi, Ahmed F Althumairy, Budur T Al Ahmadi, Nouf M Alkhamis

Keywords : Bleaching, Esthetic treatment, Veneers, Whitening

Citation Information : Al Otaibi FL, Althumairy AF, Al Ahmadi BT, Alkhamis NM. Patients’ Preferences on Different Types of Esthetic Treatment in Saudi Arabia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (1):62-67.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2714

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-01-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Aim: Dental cosmetics have always had a large-scale impact on an individual\'s social life. A variety of dental treatment regimens ranging from composite resins to ceramics are available to enhance the oral esthetic appearance. Materials and methods: The present study aimed to identify the preferred dental cosmetic treatment regimen used in Saudi Arabia. The sample included 434 patients, who were asked to mention their preferred esthetic treatment. A close-ended, predesigned questionnaire was used to collect the data. The questionnaire was made using the survey monkey which was distributed to the study participants using social networking sites like WhatsApp and E-mail. The response data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Out of 434 respondents included in the study, 140 were males and 294 were females. The majority of the participants had taken some form of esthetic dental treatment (n = 230); of these composite buildups were the most common (n = 132), followed by bleaching (n = 84), veneers (n = 31) and prepless veneers (lumineers) (n = 11). It was noted that a majority of the surveyed population preferred permanent treatment modalities (n = 304) rather than temporary treatment strategies (n = 33). Conclusion: A significant proportion of participants preferred taking permanent treatment over the temporary treatment regimens. Clinical significance: Understanding patient\'s perception regarding their dental esthetics helps the clinicians to plan treatments which are patient compliant and elicits a higher level of therapeutic satisfaction.

PDF Share
  1. Agustín-Panadero R, Solá-Ruíz MF. Vertical preparation for fixed prosthesis rehabilitation in the anterior sector. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(4):474–478. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.010.
  2. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramicne work materials. Dent Mater 2013;29(4):419–426. DOI: 10.1016/
  3. Gürel G. Porcelain laminate veneers: minimal tooth preparation by design. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(2):419–431. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.007.
  4. Javaheri D. Considerations for planning esthetic treatment ith veneers involving no or minimal preparation. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138(3):331–337. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0165.
  5. Spitzangel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, et al. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26(6):382–393. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12100.
  6. Spear F, Holloway J. Which all-ceramic system is optimal for anterior for anterior esthetics? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(Suppl):19S–24S. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0358.
  7. Leonard RH, Jr., Smith LR, Garland GE, et al. Evaluation of side effects and patients’ perceptions during tooth bleaching. J Esthetic Restor dentistry: Off Publ Am Acad Esthetic Dent 2007;19(6):355–364. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00136.x; discussion 65-6.
  8. Greenwall-Cohen J, Greenwall LH. The single discoloured tooth: vital and non-vital bleaching techniques. Br dental J 2019;226(11):839–849. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-019-0373-9.
  9. Kihn PW. Vital tooth whitening. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(2): 319–331. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2006.12.001, viii.
  10. Martini EC, Parreiras SO, Szesz AL, et al. Bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity with application of a desensitizing gel before and after in-office bleaching: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin oral investigations 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02942-9.
  11. Martini EC, Parreiras SO, Acuna ED, et al. Does the use of reservoirs have any impact on the efficacy of at-home bleaching? A systematic review. Braz dental J 2019;30(3):285–294. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201902422.
  12. L Darriba I, Cabirta Melon P, Garcia Sartal A, et al. Influence of treatment duration on the efficacy of at-home bleaching with daytime application: a randomized clinical trial. Clin oral investigations 2018;23(8):3229–3237. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018- 2744-z.
  13. ZARoNe F, LeoNe R, Di Mauro MI, et al. No-preparation ceramic veneers: a systematic review. J Osseointegration 2018;10(1):17–22.
  14. Schmidt KK, Chiayabutr Y, Phillips KM, et al. Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(6):374–382. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60077-2.
  15. Gurel G, Sesma N, Calamita MA, et al. Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics & Restor Dent 2013;33(1):31–39. DOI: 10.11607/prd.1488.
  16. Radz GM. Minimum thickness anterior porcelain restorations. Dental Clin North Am 2011;55(2):353–370. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.006.
  17. da Costa DC, Coutinho M, de Sousa AS, et al. A meta-analysis of the most indicated preparation design for porcelain laminate veneers. J Adhes Dent 2013;15(3):215–220. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a29587.
  18. Hong N, Yang H, Li J, et al. Effect of preparation designs on the Prognosis of porcelain laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Operative Dent 2017;42(6):E197–E213. DOI: 10.2341/16-390-L.
  19. Calamia JR. The current status of etched porcelain veneer restorations. J Philipp Dent Assoc 1996;47(4):35–41.
  20. De Boever JA, McCall WD Jr, Holden S, et al. Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40(3):326–333. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(78)90042-2.
  21. Zarone F, Apicella D, Sorrentino R, et al. Influence of tooth preparation design on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored by means of alumina porcelain veneers: a 3D-finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2005;21(12):1178–1188. DOI: 10.1016/ 02.014.
  22. Alhekeir DF, Al-Sarhan RA, Al Mashaan AF. Porcelain laminate veneers: clinical survey for evaluation of failure. Saudi Dent J 2014;26(2):63–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.02.003.
  23. Borba M, de Araújo MD, de Lima E, et al. Flexural strength and failure modes of layered ceramic structures. Dent Mater 2011;27(12): 1259–1266. DOI: 10.1016/
  24. Seghi RR, Daher T, Caputo A. Relative flexural strength of dental restorative ceramics. Dent Mater 1990;6(3):181–184. DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(90)90026-B.
  25. Jones DW. The strength and strengthening mechanisms of dental ceramics. In: Mclean JW, ed. Dental ceramics: procedings of the first international symposium on ceramics. Chicago: Quintessence; 1983.
  26. Turgut S, Bagis B, Ayaz EA. Achieving the desired colour in discoloured teeth, using leucite-based CAD-CAM laminate systems. J Dent 2014;42(1):68–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.018.
  27. Kihn PW, Barnes DM. The clinical evaluation of porcelain veneer: a 48-month clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;29(6): 211–221.
  28. Clyde JS, Gilmour A. Porcelain veneer: a preliminary review. Br Dent J 1998;164(1):9–14. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4806328.
  29. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, et al. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28(3):163–177. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4.
  30. Crispin BJ. Expanding the application of facial ceramic veneers. J Calif Dent Assoc 1993;21(6):43–54.
  31. Christenses GJ. Veneering of teeth: state of the art. Dent Clin North Am 1985;29:373–391.
  32. Arcari GM, Gil AMD, Baratieri LN, et al. Facetas esteticas com resinas compostas. Rev Gaucha Odont 1991;39:103–108.
  33. Birnbaum NS. Heat-tempered composite resin laminate veneers in current opinion in cosmetic dentistry. 2nd ed. Philadelphia PA: Current Science; 1994.
  34. Albers HF. Tooth-Colored Restoratives. Cotati: Alta Books; 1985.
  35. Fahi NJ, Denehy GE, Jackson RD. Protocol for predictable restoration of anterior teeth with composite resins. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1995;7(8):13–21.
  36. Aldaij M, Alshehri T, Alzeer A, et al. Patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatment desire to improve esthetics. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2018;12(3):90–95. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10062-0033.
  37. Akarslan ZZ, Sadik B, Erten H, et al. Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics. Indian J Dental Res 2009;20(2):195–200. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.52902.
  38. Majed DA, May AA, Raneem IA. Satisfaction of a saudi population with their smiles. Adv Dent & Oral Health 2017;3(3):1–7.
  39. Thiyagarajan A, Kumar D. Dental esthetics: perception from future dental professionals. Acta Sci Dental Sci 2018;2(4):03–05.
  40. Granell-Ruiz M, Fons-Font A, Labaig-Rueda C, et al. A clinical longitudinal study 323 porcelain laminate veneers. Period of study from 3 to 11 years. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;3:12. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.15.e531.
  41. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, et al. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodontics 2012;25(1):79–85.
  42. Burke FT. Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review. J Esthetic Restor Dent 2012;24(4):257–265. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00517.x.
  43. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH, Phillips K, et al. Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(2):171–180. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80009-8.
  44. Chen JH, Shi CX, Wang M, et al. Clinical evaluation of 546 tetracycline-stained teeth treated with porcelain laminate veneers. J Dent 2005;33(1):3–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.06.008.
  45. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation–a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics & Restor Dent 2005;25(1):9–17.
  46. Petridis HP, Zekeridou A, Malliari M, et al. Survival of ceramic veneers made of different materials after a minimum follow-up period of five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Esthet Dent 2012;7(2):138–152.
  47. Shaini FJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years. J Oral Rehabilitation 1997;24(8):553–559. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00545.x.
  48. Land MF, Hopp CD. Survival rates of all-ceramic systems differ by clinical indication and fabrication method. J Evid Based Dental Pract 2010;10(1):37–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.11.013.
  49. Meijering AC, Creugers NH, Roeters FJ, et al. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent 1998;26(7):563–568. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00032-8.
  50. Alfouzan A, Al-Sanie AA, Al-Dhafiri RA. Arab societal awareness of dental veneers. J Contemporary Dental Pract 2018;19(3):257–261. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2248.
  51. Asaad RS, Alshwaer AA, Alahmadi SA, et al. Awareness of the population about ceramic laminate veneers in Saudi Arabia. Curr Sci Int 2019;8(1):42–46.
  52. Sowmya S, Sunitha S, Dhakshaini MR, et al. Esthetics with veneers: a review. Int J Dental Health Concerns 2015;1(1):1–5. DOI: 10.15713/ins.ijdhc.11.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.