The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Impact of Fluoridated and Non-fluoridated Mouth Rinses on Frictional Resistance between Orthodontic Archwire and Bracket: A Comparative Study

Rashtra Bhushan, Pavithra K Ramanna, Senthil Kumar, Radhika Thakkar, Parthivi Singh, Mukta Nigam

Keywords : Archwire, Frictional resistance, Orthodontic bracket, Surface roughness

Citation Information : Bhushan R, Ramanna PK, Kumar S, Thakkar R, Singh P, Nigam M. Impact of Fluoridated and Non-fluoridated Mouth Rinses on Frictional Resistance between Orthodontic Archwire and Bracket: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (12):1337-1341.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2944

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 13-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: The present study aimed to assess the effect of fluoridated and nonfluoridated mouth rinses on resistance to friction between orthodontic bracket and archwire. Materials and methods: This study comprises 60 premolar stainless steel (SS) brackets with 0.022 inches slot size. The 0.019 × 0.025 dimensions SS archwires were cut into 5 cm long specimens. They were grouped into three main categories, group I: artificial saliva (control solution), group II: Aloe Dent mouthwash (ALO), and group III: 0.05% sodium fluoride mouthwash. The specimens from each group were either immersed in the test solution or in the control solution for 10 hours. Later, the specimens were transferred to an incubator maintained at 37°C. Post 10 hours, the specimens were immersed for 30 minutes in distilled water. A scanning electron microscope was used to study the surface morphology and a universal testing machine was used to measure the frictional resistance. Results: The distribution of normality for three study groups’ recorded data was checked using Shapiro–Wilk test. The highest frictional resistance (1.94 ± 0.02) was demonstrated by specimens immersed in 0.05% sodium fluoride mouthwash than those immersed in Aloe Dent mouthwash (1.28 ± 0.66) and artificial saliva (1.10 ± 0.32). The difference found between the groups by an analysis of covariance was statistically significant. The highest surface roughness (22.30 ± 0.12) was revealed by specimens immersed in 0.05% sodium fluoride mouthwash than those immersed in Aloe Dent mouthwash (18.28 ± 0.26) and artificial saliva (15.86 ± 0.42). A statistically significant difference between the groups was shown by an analysis of covariance. Conclusion: After considering the drawbacks of this study, we conclude that specimens immersed in Aloe Dent mouthwash demonstrated less frictional resistance and surface roughness when compared to those immersed in 0.05% sodium fluoride mouthwash. Clinical significance: During sliding mechanism, the frictional resistance between orthodontic archwire and brackets imposes problems, such as lessening the applied force and movement of tooth, and also results in anchorage loss. So, orthodontists should always take care while prescribing mouthwashes to reduce their effects on the friction.


PDF Share
  1. Walker MP, Ries D, Kula K, et al. Mechanical properties and surface characterization of beta titanium and stainless steel orthodontic wire following topical fluoride treatment. Angle Orthod 2007;77(2):342–348. DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0342:MPASCO]2.0.CO;2.
  2. Burrow SJ. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(4):442–447. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.023.
  3. Huang HH. Variation in surface topography of different NiTi orthodontic archwires in various commercial fluoride-containing environments. Dent Mater 2007;23(1):24–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.042.
  4. Husmann P, Bourauel C, Wessinger M, et al. The frictional behavior of coated guiding archwires. J Orofac Orthop 2002 May;63(3):199–211. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-002-0009-5.
  5. Prashant PS, Nandan H, Gopalakrishnan M. Friction in orthodontics. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015;7(Suppl 2):S334–S338. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.163439.
  6. Abdelgader Alwafe N, Hammad SHM, AbdelMawla El-wassefy N, et al. Evaluation of the effect of an experimental herbal versus fluoridated mouthwash on frictional resistance and surface roughness between orthodontic brackets and two types of archwire: in vitro study. J Dent Mater Tech 2019;8(4):205–214.
  7. Lima VN, Coimbra ME, Derech CD, et al. The frictional forces on stainless steel and plastic brackets using four types of wire ligation. Dent Press J Orthod 2010;15(2):82–86. DOI: 10.1590/S2176-94512010000200011.
  8. Tselepis M, Brockhurst P, West VC. The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106(2):131–138. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70030-3.
  9. Al-Mansouri N, Palmer G, Moles DR, et al. The effects of lubrication on the static frictional resistance of orthodontic brackets. Aust Orthod J 2011;27:132–138.
  10. Choudhary J, Shashikumar B, Patil AK. Evaluation and comparison of two different mouthwashes on frictional resistance between orthodontic bracket and archwire: An in vitro study. J Indian Orthodon Soc 2019;53(2):117–125. DOI: 10.1177/0301574219840886.
  11. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Prewitt MJ. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod 1991;61:293–302.
  12. Heravi F, Moayed MH, Mokhber N. Effect of fluoride on nickel-titanium and stainless steel orthodontic archwires: an in-vitro study. J Dent (Tehran) 2015;12(1):49–59.
  13. Geramy A, Hooshmand T, Etezadi T. Effect of sodium fluoride mouthwash on the frictional resistance of orthodontic wires. J Dent (Tehran) 2017;14(5):254–258.
  14. Kao C-T, Ding S-J, Wang C-K, et al. Comparison of frictional resistance after immersion of metal brackets and orthodontic wires in a fluoride-containing prophylactic agent. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130(5):568.e1-e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.028.
  15. Lee J, Kim HY, Zhou H, et al. Green synthesis of phytochemical-stabilized Au nanoparticles under ambient conditions and their biocompatibility and antioxidative activity. J Mater Chem 2011;21(35):13316–13326. DOI: 10.1039/c1jm11592h.
  16. Nanjundan K, Vimala G. Evaluation of frictional resistance and surface characteristics after immersion of orthodontic brackets and wire in different chemical solutions: a comparative in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2016;27(5):513–520. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290. 195641.
  17. Alavi S, Farahi A. Effect of fluoride on friction between bracket and wire. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011;8(Suppl 1):S37–S42.
  18. Schiff N, Dalard F, Lissac M, et al. Corrosion resistance of three orthodontic brackets: a comparative study of three fluoride mouthwashes. The Eur J Orthod 2005;27(6):541–549. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji050.
  19. Lin M-C, Lin S-C, Lee T-H, et al. Surface analysis and corrosion resistance of different stainless steel orthodontic brackets in artificial saliva. Angle Orthod 2006;76(2):322–329.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.