The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Clinical Audit of Minimally Invasive Nonsurgical Techniques in Active Periodontal Therapy

Carlo Ghezzi, Luca Ferrantino, Camilla Donghi, Serena Vaghi, Valeria Viganò, Davide Costa, Matteo Mandaglio, Alberto Pispero, Giovanni Lodi

Keywords : Clinical audit, Periodontitis, Supportive periodontal therapy, Tooth loss

Citation Information : Ghezzi C, Ferrantino L, Donghi C, Vaghi S, Viganò V, Costa D, Mandaglio M, Pispero A, Lodi G. Clinical Audit of Minimally Invasive Nonsurgical Techniques in Active Periodontal Therapy. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (4):431-437.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2815

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-04-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aims: Periodontitis is one of the most widespread diseases worldwide. Many efforts have been made to increase the efficacy of periodontitis therapy as much as possible. Recently, minimally invasive nonsurgical techniques (MINST) were introduced in the periodontal field as an alternative to minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIST). This clinical audit aims to evaluate the results of MINST in the initial phase of treatment for periodontitis. Materials and methods: One hundred seven patients with periodontitis who were treated with MINST between 2013 and 2017 and reevaluated after 2 months were included in this clinical audit. The primary outcome analyzed was the proportion of pocket closure. The secondary outcomes were tooth extraction before active periodontal therapy, full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) change, full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) change, average probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction, and average clinical attachment level (CAL) gain between the baseline and reevaluation values. Results: A total of 2,407 teeth were included in the analysis. At the patient level, the treatment resulted in a mean pocket closure rate of 71.6 ± 15.7% for sites with an initial PPD ≥5 mm. The treatment was statistically significantly (p < 0.001) more effective with respect to the primary outcome compared with expected values reported in a recent meta-analysis (57%). The subgroup analysis revealed statistically significant differences between single and multirooted teeth and between shallow (5–6 mm) and deep pockets (≥7 mm) at the baseline. Conclusion: Nonsurgical periodontal therapy with MINST achieved satisfactory results that were better than expected based on the scientific literature. Single-rooted and shallow pockets showed the best proportion of pocket closure at the reevaluation after treatment. Clinical significance: Minimally invasive nonsurgical techniques can be the treatment of choice when approaching periodontally diseased patients with nonsurgical periodontal therapy.


PDF Share
  1. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, et al. Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990-2010: a systematic review and meta-regression. J Dent Res 2014;93(11):1045–1053. DOI: 10.1177/0022034514552491.
  2. Frencken JE, Sharma P, Stenhouse L, et al. Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis - a comprehensive review. J Clin Periodontol 2017;44(suppl):94–105. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe. 12677.
  3. Tonetti MS, Jepsen S, Jin L, et al. Impact of the global burden of periodontal diseases on health, nutrition and wellbeing of mankind: a call for global action. J Clin Periodontol 2017;44(5):456–462. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12732.
  4. Miyamoto T, Kumagai T, Jones JA, et al. Compliance as a prognostic indicator: retrospective study of 505 patients treated and maintained for 15 years. J Periodontol 2006;77(2):223–232. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.040349.
  5. Costa FO, Miranda Cota LO, Pereira Lages EJ, et al. Periodontal risk assessment model in a sample of regular and irregular compliers under maintenance therapy: a 3-year prospective study. J Periodontol 2012;83(3):292–300. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2011.110187.
  6. Tunkel J, Heinecke A, Flemmig TF. A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(suppl 3):72–91. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.4.x.
  7. Nyman S, Sarhed G, Ericsson I, et al. Role of “diseased” root cementum in healing following treatment of periodontal disease. An experimental study in the dog. J Periodont Res 1986;21(5):496–503. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1986.tb01485.x.
  8. Cobb CM. Clinical significance of non-surgical periodontal therapy: an evidence-based perspective of scaling and root planing. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(suppl 2):6–16. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.29. s2.4.x.
  9. Ower P. Minimally-invasive non-surgical periodontal therapy. Dent Update 2013;40(4):289–295. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2013.40.4.289.
  10. Armitage GC, Xenoudi P. Post-treatment supportive care for the natural dentition and dental implants. Periodontol 2000 2016;71(1):164–184. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12122.
  11. Ribeiro FV, Casarin RCV, Júnior FHN, et al. The role of enamel matrix derivative protein in minimally invasive surgery in treating intrabony defects in single-rooted teeth: a Randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2011;82(4):522–532. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.100454.
  12. Nibali L, Pometti D, Chen T-T, et al. Minimally invasive non-surgical approach for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42(9):853–859. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12443.
  13. Armitage GC. Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Ann Periodontol 1999;4(1):1–6. DOI: 10.1902/annals.1999.4.1.1.
  14. Armitage GC. Periodontal diagnoses and classification of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 2004;34(1):9–21. DOI: 10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.003421.x.
  15. Laster L, Laudenbach KW, Stoller NH. An evaluation of clinical tooth mobility measurements. J Periodontol 1975;46(10):603–607. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1975.46.10.603.
  16. Hamp SE, Nyman S, Lindhe J. Periodontal treatment of multirooted teeth. Results after 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2(3):126–135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1975.tb01734.x.
  17. Kwok V, Caton JG. Commentary: prognosis revisited: a system for assigning periodontal prognosis. J Periodontol 2007;78(11):2063–2071. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.070210.
  18. Suvan J, Leira Y, Moreno F, et al. Subgingival instrumentation for treatment of periodontitis. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2019. , epub, Supporting Information S1. http://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13245.
  19. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF. A systematic review on the clinical efficacy of subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(Suppl 3):55–71. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.3.x.
  20. Gherlone E, Allegrini S, Annibali S, et al. Clinical recommendation in odontostomatology (in Italian). 2017. 1–390. Available at http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2637_allegato.pdf.
  21. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol 2018;89(Suppl 1):74–84. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.17-0719.
  22. Hung H-C, Douglass CW. Meta-analysis of the effect of scaling and root planing, surgical treatment and antibiotic therapies on periodontal probing depth and attachment loss. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(11):975–986. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.291102.x.
  23. Hallmon WW, Rees TD. Local anti-infective therapy: mechanical and physical approaches. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8(1):99–114. DOI: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.99.
  24. Ciantar M. Time to shift: from scaling and root planing to root surface debridement. Prim Dent J 2014;3(3):38–42. DOI: 10.1308/205016814812736592.
  25. Solís Moreno C, Santos A, Nart J, et al. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study. J Periodont Res 2012;47(5):608–615. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01473.x.
  26. Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Leal PC, et al. Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo. Clin Oral Invest 2008;12(2):143–150. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-007-0167-3.
  27. Dragoo MR. A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instruments on subgingival debridement. 1. with unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12(4):310–323.
  28. Clifford LR, Needleman IG, Chan YK. Comparison of periodontal pocket penetration by conventional and microultrasonic inserts. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26(2):124–130. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260210.x.
  29. Rann SH, Holmlund A, Rahm VA. Clinical, socioeconomic and patient outcomes of intensive versus conventional scaling and root planning in the treatment of periodontal infection. Oral Health Prev Dent 2008;6(4):303–308.
  30. Busslinger A, Lampe K, Beuchat M, et al. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28(7):642–649. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028007642.x.
  31. Graumann SJ, Sensat ML, Stoltenberg JL. Air polishing: a review of current literature. J Dent Hyg 2013;87(4):173–180.
  32. Sculean A, Bastendorf K-D, Becker C, et al. A paradigm shift in mechanical biofilm management? Subgingival air polishing: a new way to improve mechanical biofilm management in the dental practice. Quintessence Int 2013;44(7):475–477. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a29615.
  33. Bühler J, Amato M, Weiger R, et al. A systematic review on the patient perception of periodontal treatment using air polishing devices. Int J Dent Hygiene 2016;14(1):4–14. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12119.
  34. Bühler J, Amato M, Weiger R, et al. A systematic review on the effects of air polishing devices on oral tissues. Int J Dent Hygiene 2016;14(1):15–28. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12120.
  35. Arabaci T, Ciçek Y, Ozgöz M, et al. The comparison of the effects of three types of piezoelectric ultrasonic tips and air polishing system on the filling materials: an in vitro study. Int J Dent Hygiene 2007;5(4):205–210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00265.x.
  36. Petersilka G, Heckel R, Koch R, et al. Evaluation of an ex vivo porcine model to investigate the effect of low abrasive airpolishing. Clin Oral Invest 2018;22(7):2669–2673. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2536-5.
  37. Wennström JL, Tomasi C, Bertelle A, et al. Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement versus quadrant scaling and root planing as an initial approach in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32(8):851–859. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00776.x.
  38. Tomasi C, Leyland AH, Wennström JL. Factors influencing the outcome of non-surgical periodontal treatment: a multilevel approach. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34(8):682–690. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01111.x.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.