The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Effect of Different LED Light-curing Units on Degree of Conversion and Microhardness of Bulk-fill Composite Resin

Juliana S Siagian, Dennis Dennis, Tulus Ikhsan, Trimurni Abidin

Keywords : Bulk-fill composite resin, Degree of conversion, LED light-curing unit, Microhardness

Citation Information : Siagian JS, Dennis D, Ikhsan T, Abidin T. Effect of Different LED Light-curing Units on Degree of Conversion and Microhardness of Bulk-fill Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (6):615-620.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2848

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 23-07-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of the use of second-generation and third-generation LED light-curing units (LCUs) on the degree of conversion (DC) and microhardness (VHN) of bulk-fill resin composites. Materials and methods: Thirty cylindrical specimens (each n = 5) of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill, Filtek™ Bulk-Fill Posterior Restorative, and SDR flow were prepared in metal molds (5 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness) and cured with second-generation LED (SmartLite® Focus®, Dentsply Sirona) and third-generation LED (Bluephase® style, Ivoclar Vivadent) resulting in six groups. Degree of conversion was determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and microhardness with Vickers microhardness tester. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and least significance difference (LSD) test, and DC and microhardness were correlated using Pearson\'s correlation (α = 0.05). Results: There was a significant difference between DC and VHN between all groups of bulk-fill which were cured by second-generation LED curing light and third-generation LED curing light. Then there is no significant difference between DC of the three composite bulk-fill resins by (second-generation LED vs third-generation LED curing light). Conclusion: The second-generation LED curing light can still be used to cure bulk-fill resin composites by increasing the duration of irradiation. Clinical significance: In the microhardness test, there was a significant difference in the Filtek™ Bulk-Fill Posterior Restorative resin composites.

PDF Share
  1. Gonçalves F, de Paiva Campos LM, Rodrigues-Júnior EC, et al. Comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity. Braz Oral Res 2018;32(0):17. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0017.
  2. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, dan Rawls HR. Philips’ Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed., St. Louis: Elsevier; 2014. pp. 290–295.
  3. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Hadis MA, et al. Progress in dimethacrylate–based dental composite technology and curing efficiency. Dent Mater 2013;29(2):493–511. DOI: 10.1016/
  4. Wahbi MA, Aalam FA, Fatiny FI, et al. Characterization of heat emission of light-curing units. Saudi Dent J 2012;24(2):91–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.01.003.
  5. Alrahlah A, Silikas N, Watts DC. Post-cure depth of bulk fill dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2014;30(2):149–154. DOI: 10.1016/
  6. Aldossary M, Roebuck E, Santini A. Bulk fill resin composite materials cured with single-peak versus dual-peak LED LCUs. Acta Medica Marisiensis 2016;62(1):5–14. DOI: 10.1515/amma-2016-0009.
  7. Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P. The effect of composition, temperature and post-irradiation curing of bulk fill resin composites on polymerization efficiency. Mater Res 2016;19(2):466–473. DOI: 10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2015-0614.
  8. Christensen GJ. Advantages and challenges of bulk fill resins. CR Foundation 2012;5(1):1–6.
  9. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, et al. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk- fill composite. J Dent 2014;42(8):993–1000. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.009.
  10. Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, et al. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J 2017;222(5):337–344. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.214.
  11. Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P. Third-generation vs a second-generation led curing light: effect on. Knoop microhardness. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31(5):1–9.
  12. Ritter AV, Boushell LW, Walter R. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry, ch. 6 7th ed., St. Louis: Elsevier; 2019.
  13. Sakaguchi RL, Power JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed., Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012. pp. 161–181.
  14. Pelissier B, Jacquot B, Palin WM, et al. Three generations of LED lights and clinical implications for Optimizing their use. 1: from past to present. Dent Update 2011;38(10):660–670. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2011.38.10.660.
  15. Gokce K, Ersoy KM, Ozel E, et al. Effect of different light curing systems on surface hardness of composite resins. Balk J Stom 2013;17:75–78.
  16. Namoto R, Mc Cabe JF, Nitta K, et al. Relative efficiency of radiation sources for photopolymerization. Odontology 2009;97(2):109–114. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-009-0105-8.
  17. Yaman BC, Efes BG, Dorter C, et al. The effects of halogen and light emitting diode light curing on the depth of cure and surface microhardness of composite resins. J Conserv Dent 2011;14(2): 136–139. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.82613.
  18. AlShaafi MM. Factors affecting polymerization of resin-based 5 composites: a literature review. Saudi Dent J 2017;29(2):1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.01.002.
  19. Conte G, Panetta M, Mancini M, et al. Curing effectiveness of single-peak and multi-peak led light curing units on Tpo-containing resin composites with different chromatic characteristics. Oral Implantol 2017;2(2):140–150. DOI: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.140.
  20. Mikhail SS, Schricker SR, Azer SS, et al. Optical characteristics of contemporary dental composite resin materials. J Dent 2013;41(9):771–778. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.001.
  21. Al-ahdal K, Ilie N, Silikas N, et al. Polymerization kinetics and impact of post polymerization on degree of conversion of bulk fill resin composite at clinically relevant depth. Dent Mater 2015;31(10): 1207–1213. DOI: 10.1016/
  22. Alshali RZ, Silikas N, dan Satterthwaite JD. Degree of conversion of bulk fill compared to conventional resin composites at two time intervals. Dent Mater 2013;29(9):213–217. DOI: 10.1016/
  23. Dickens S, Stansbury J, Choi K, et al. Photopolymerization kinetics of methacrylate dental resins. Macromolecules 2003;36(16):6043–6053. DOI: 10.1021/ma021675k.
  24. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2002;23(8):1819–1829. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00308-8.
  25. Papadogiannis D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P, et al. Viscoelastic properties, creep behavior and degree of conversion of bulk fill composite resins. Dent Mater 2015;31(12):1533–1541. DOI: 10.1016/ 09.022.
  26. Ilie N, Keßler A, Durner J. Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk-fill resin based composites. J Dent 2013;41(8):695–702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.008.
  27. Zorzin J, Maier E, Harre S, et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater 2015;31(3):293–301. DOI: 10.1016/
  28. Halvorson R, Erickson R, Davidson C. An energy conversion relationship predictive of conversion profiles and depth of cure for resin-based composite. Operative Dentistry- University Of Washington 2003;28(3):307–314.
  29. Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J 2011;56:59–66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01296.x.
  30. Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, et al. Depth of cure of resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater 2012;28(5):521–528. DOI: 10.1016/
  31. Thomé T, Steagall Jr. W, Tachibana A, et al. Influence of the distance of the curing light source and composite shade on hardness of two composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15(6):486–491. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000600006.
  32. Caldas D, Almeida J, Correr-Sobrinho L, et al. Influence of curing tip distance on resin composite Knoop hardness number, using three different light curing units. Operative Dentistry-University Of Washington 2003;28(3):315–320.
  33. Silva CM, Dias KR. Compressive strength of esthetic restorative materials polymerized with quartz-tungsten-halogen light and blue LED. Braz Dent J 2009;20(1):54–57. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000100009.
  34. Mandikose MN, Mcgicney GP, Davis E, et al. A comparison of the wear resistence and hardness of indirect composite resin. J Prosth Dent 2001;85(4):386–395. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114267.
  35. Santos GP, Medeiros IS, Fellows CE, et al. Composite depth of cure obtained with QTH and LED units assessed by microhardness and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Oper Dent 2007;31(1):79–83. DOI: 10.2341/06-26.
  36. Ferracane JL. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater 1985;1(1):11–14. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80058-0.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.