Impact of Different Root Conditioning Agents on Periodontally Affected Root Surface: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study
Mohammad Jalaluddin, Dinsha AR Naseema, Mohammad A Alshahrani, Vinutha Kumari, Jenny Atom
Citation Information :
Jalaluddin M, Naseema DA, Alshahrani MA, Kumari V, Atom J. Impact of Different Root Conditioning Agents on Periodontally Affected Root Surface: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (8):863-867.
Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of various root-conditioning agents on root surfaces that are periodontally affected. Materials and methods: A total of 90 human teeth having single root that were extracted because of chronic periodontitis were chosen. The extracted teeth were cleaned of saliva and blood using a soft-bristled brush and distilled water. The investigational groups were categorized into group I—doxycycline HCl, group II—ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and group III—tetracycline HCl. Samples were readied for histological study by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The SEM was used to assess the effectiveness of smear layer removal, amount of patent dentinal tubules out of the totality of dentinal tubules present, and the appreciation of collagen fiber-like structures inside the intertubular area. Results: The highest efficacy for smear layer removal was seen for group III—tetracycline HCl samples (1.80 ± 0.148) followed next by group II— EDTA (1.36 ± 0.230), and group I—doxycycline HCl (1.30 ± 0.283). The highest number of patent dentinal tubules were seen in group III—tetracycline HCl (44.50 ± 0.18) followed immediately by group II—EDTA (38.10 ± 0.42), and group I—doxycycline HCl (34.90 ± 0.23). The highest number of appreciation of collagen-like structures was recorded in group III—tetracycline HCl (2.64 ± 0.04) followed next by group I—doxycycline HCl (1.88 ± 0.10) and group II—EDTA (1.76 ± 0.28). Conclusion: The present in vitro study concludes tetracycline HCl root-conditioning agent to be significantly more efficient in smear layer removal, exposing collagen fibers and amount of patent dentinal tubules than doxycycline HCl and EDTA. Clinical significance: The modification of the root surface of human teeth with the use of root conditioning agents leads to enhanced attachment by connective tissue resulting in improved reconstructive periodontal treatment goals.
Rohanizadeh R, Legeros RZ. Ultrastructural study of calculus-enamel and calculus-root interfaces. Arch Oral Biol 2005;50(1):89–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.07.001.
Chahal GS, Chhina K, Chhabra V, et al. Effect of citric acid, tetracycline, and doxycycline on instrumented periodontally involved root surfaces: a SEM study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18(1):32–37. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.128196.
Terranova VP, Franzetti LC, Hic S, et al. A biochemical approach to periodontal regeneration: tetracycline treatment of dentin promotes fibroblast adhesion and growth. J Periodontal Res 1986;21(4):330–337. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1986.tb01467.x.
Nanda T, Jain S, Kaur H, et al. Root conditioning in periodontology—revisited. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2014;5(2):356–358. DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.136183.
Mythili R, Ahamed BR. Efficacy of tetracycline hydrochloride and doxycycline hydrochloride as a root conditioner—a scanning electron microscopic study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2006;10: 227–232.
Madison JG, Hokett SD. The effects of different tetracyclines on the dentin root surface of instrumented, periodontally involved human teeth: a comparative scanning electron microscope study. J Periodontol 1997;68(8):739–745. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68. 8.739.
Leite FR, Sampaio JE, Zandim DL, et al. Influence of root-surface conditioning with acid and chelating agents on clot stabilization. Quintessence Int 2010;41(4):341–349.
Nanda T, Jain S, Kapoor D, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and tetracycline hydrochloride as root conditioning agents: an in vitro study. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2012;4(1):2–8. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0754.131368.
Nathalia GA, Maria LR, Fabiana H, et al. Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning. A scanning electron microscopy. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19(5):469–475. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572011000500006.
Isik AG, Tarim B, Hafez AA, et al. A comparative scanning electron microscopic study on the characteristics of demineralized dentin root surface using different tetracycline HCl concentrations and application times. J Periodontol 2000;71(2):219–225. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.2.219.
Lafferty TA, Gher ME, Gray JL. Comparative SEM study on the effect of acid etching with tetracycline HCl or citric acid on instrumented periodontally-involved human root surfaces. J Periodontol 1993;64(8):689–693. DOI: 10.1902/jop.19126.96.36.1999.
Shetty B, Dinesh A, Seshan H. The comparative effects of tetracyclines and citric acid on dentin root surface of periodontally involved human teeth: a scanning electron microscope study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2008;12(1):8–15. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.44090.
Ashok KP, Shobha PM. A comparative scanning electron microscope study on the effect of acid etching with citric acid, tetracycline hydrochloride and EDTA on instrumented, periodontally involved root surfaces. Indian J Stomatol 2010;1:61–66.
Garg J, Maurya R, Gupta A, et al. An in vitro scanning electron microscope study to evaluate the efficacy of various root conditioning agents. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015;19(5):520–524. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.167168.
Silva AC, Moura CC, Ferreira JA, et al. Biological effects of a root conditioning treatment on periodontally affected teeth—an in vitro analysis. Braz Dent J 2016;27(2):160–168. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201600427.