The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Evaluation of the Preventive Effect of Composites Containing Silver and TiO2 Nanoparticles on Demineralization around Orthodontic Brackets

Hooman Zarif Najafi, Niloofar Azadeh, Mohammad Motamedifar

Citation Information : Najafi HZ, Azadeh N, Motamedifar M. Evaluation of the Preventive Effect of Composites Containing Silver and TiO2 Nanoparticles on Demineralization around Orthodontic Brackets. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (8):874-879.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2903

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-12-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the antidemineralization effect of composites containing silver and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles used for bonding brackets to tooth specimens. Materials and methods: A total of 75 freshly extracted teeth were etched and primed and then randomly assigned to three adhesive groups: (1) conventional orthodontic adhesive, (2) conventional adhesive mixed with TiO2 nanoparticles, and (3) conventional adhesive mixed with silver nanoparticles. In each group, brackets were bonded with the pertinent adhesive. Teeth were painted with varnish on all surfaces except a 2-mm rim around brackets. Specimens were subjected to a cariogenic process in a circulating microbial model inoculated with Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei for 12 days and subsequently sectioned for cross-sectional microhardness testing. In each specimen, enamel microhardness was determined in three locations: 25–30 μm and 1.5 mm away from the bracket and under the varnish-protected enamel. Hardness of enamel in the first two locations was reported as a percentage of the protected enamel hardness. Results: Enamel hardness was higher at 25–30 μm away from brackets in both the experimental groups (p value < 0.05), and the nanoparticles acted similarly in this location (p value = 0.992). At 1.5 mm away from the brackets, there was no difference between experimental and control groups (p value > 0.05); the effect of TiO2 attenuated in this location while silver remained as potent. Conclusion: Both nanoparticles resulted in decreased demineralization at 25–30 μm from the bracket but farther away the effect of TiO2 was diminished. Clinical significance: According to the results of this study, composites containing silver and TiO2 nanoparticles can be suggested as anti-demineralization adhesives in case their biocompatibility is proved.

  1. Boersma JG, van der Veen MH, Lagerweij MD, et al. Caries prevalence measured with QLF after treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances: influencing factors. Caries Res 2005;39(1):41–47. DOI: 10.1159/000081655.
  2. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94(1):68–73. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90453-2.
  3. Todd MA, Staley RN, Kanellis MJ, et al. Effect of a fluoride varnish on demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116(2):159–167. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70213-1.
  4. Ahn SJ, Lee SJ, Kook JK, et al. Experimental antimicrobial orthodontic adhesives using nanofillers and silver nanoparticles. Dent Mater 2009;25(2):206–213. DOI: 10.1016/
  5. Poosti M, Ramazanzadeh B, Zebarjad M, et al. Shear bond strength and antibacterial effects of orthodontic composite containing TiO2 nanoparticles. Eur J Orthod 2013;35(5):676–679. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjs073.
  6. Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. J Dent 2011;39(9):589–598. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.05.006.
  7. Melo MAS, Cheng L, Zhang K, et al. Novel dental adhesives containing nanoparticles of silver and amorphous calcium phosphate. Dent Mater 2013;29(2):199–210. DOI: 10.1016/
  8. Cheng L, Weir MD, Xu HHK, et al. Effect of amorphous calcium phosphate and silver nanocomposites on dental plaque microcosm biofilms. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012;100(5):1378–1386. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32709.
  9. Vargas-Reus MA, Memarzadeh K, Huang J, et al. Antimicrobial activity of nanoparticulate metal oxides against peri-implantitis pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2012;40(2):135–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.04.012.
  10. Besinis A, De Peralta T, Handy RD. The antibacterial effects of silver, titanium dioxide and silica dioxide nanoparticles compared to the dental disinfectant chlorhexidine on streptococcus mutans using a suite of bioassays. Nanotoxicol 2014;8(1):1–16. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2012.742935.
  11. Paschos E, Geiger FJ, Malyk Y, et al. Efficacy of four preventive measures against enamel demineralization at the bracket periphery-comparison of microhardness and confocal laser microscopy analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20(6):1355–1366. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1624-z.
  12. Hernández-Sierra JF, Ruiz F, Cruz Pena DC, et al. The antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans to nanoparticles of silver, zinc oxide, and gold. Nanomedicine 2008;4(3):237–240. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2008.04.005.
  13. Paschos E, Kleinschrodt T, Clementino-Luedemann T, et al. Effect of different bonding agents on prevention of enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(5):603–612. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.028.
  14. Fontana M, Dunipace AJ, Gregory RL, et al. An in vitro microbial model for studying secondary caries formation. Caries Res 1996;30(2): 112–118. DOI: 10.1159/000262146.
  15. Magalhães AC, Comar LP, Rios D, et al. Effect of a 4% titanium tetrafluoride (TiF4) varnish on demineralisation and remineralisation of bovine enamel in vitro. J Dent 2008;36(2):158–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.12.001.
  16. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, et al. The international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35(3):170–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x.
  17. Magalhães AC, Moron BM, Comar LP, et al. Comparison of cross-sectional hardness and transverse microradiography of artificial carious enamel lesions induced by different demineralising solutions and gels. Caries Res 2009;43(6):474–483. DOI: 10.1159/000264685.
  18. Sukontapatipark W, el-Agroudi MA, Selliseth NJ, et al. Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Orthod 2001;23(5): 475–484. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/23.5.475.
  19. Beyth N, Houri-Haddad Y, Domb A, et al. Alternative antimicrobial approach: nano-antimicrobial materials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:246012. DOI: 10.1155/2015/246012.
  20. Taglietti A, Diaz Fernandez YA, Amato E, et al. Antibacterial activity of glutathione-coated silver nanoparticles against gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Langmuir 2012;28(21):8140–8148. DOI: 10.1021/la3003838.
  21. Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, et al. Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2007;3(1):95–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2006. 12.001.
  22. Cabal B, Cafini F, Esteban-Tejeda L, et al. Inhibitory effect on in vitro streptococcus oralis biofilm of a soda-lime glass containing silver nanoparticles coating on titanium alloy. PLoS ONE 2012;7(8):e42393. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042393.
  23. Chen W, Oh S, Ong AP, et al. Antibacterial and osteogenic properties of silver-containing hydroxyapatite coatings produced using a sol gel process. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;82(4):899–906. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31197.
  24. Verdier T, Coutand M, Bertron A, et al. Antibacterial activity of TiO2 photocatalyst alone or in coatings on E. coli: the influence of methodological aspects. Coatings 2014;4(3):670–686. DOI: 10.3390/coatings4030670.
  25. Allaker RP. The use of nanoparticles to control oral biofilm formation. J Dent Res 2010;89(11):1175–1186. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510377794.
  26. Braydich-Stolle L, Hussain S, Schlager JJ, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of nanoparticles in mammalian germline stem cells. Toxicol Sci 2005;88(2):412–419. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi256.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.