The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 9 ( September, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Are Bioceramics the Dernier Cri in the Management of Stage 4 Developed Root? A Finite Element Analysis

Sonali Sharma, Sanjay M Londhe, Mithra N Hegde, Vandana Sadananda

Citation Information : Sharma S, Londhe SM, Hegde MN, Sadananda V. Are Bioceramics the Dernier Cri in the Management of Stage 4 Developed Root? A Finite Element Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (9):961-969.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2916

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-01-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Aim: To compare the stress distribution of four modalities of reinforcing the radicular space of a pulpless central incisor exhibiting stage 4 root development. Materials and methods: The model of a pulpless immature central incisor with a stage 4 of root development supporting periodontium was generated based on the properties. The longitudinal growth of the root was completed. Four such models were developed. Then, the radicular space was rehabilitated as follows: Model 1: Ceramicrete; Model 2: Biomimetic Mineralization; Model 3: Biodentine; Model 4: Bioaggregate. They were subjected to three different loading conditions. One was to mimic the mastication by applying a load of 70 N applied at 45° angle. Second loading condition was a vertical load of 100 N to mimic bruxism. The third loading condition was to mirror the impact of a frontal trauma. A load of 100 N was applied labially. Results: It was observed that during mastication, Model 2 has exhibited the lowest concentration of von Mises stresses, followed by Model 3 and then Model 4 followed by Model 1; this could be because the modulus of elasticity of Model 2 is comparable to that of Dentin. During bruxism and horizontal impact, the maximal stress concentration was found in Model 4, Model 3, Model 2, followed by Model 1. Conclusion: The closer the elasticity of modulus of the primary endodontic replacement monoblock was to that of dentin, the lower were the stresses generated. However, as the increase in stress values was minimal between groups, these obturating materials can be viable reinforcement materials for the rehabilitation of cases of stage 4 developing root. Biomimetic mineralization strategies can be a viable treatment option for managing cases of the open apex. Clinical relevance: Biomimetic mineralization strategies and bioceramics can be used for obturation of root canals with open apex, instead of utilizing these bioceramics as apical plugs.

  1. Grossman LI, Oliet S, Del Rio CE. Endodontic Practice. The University of Michigan: Lea & Febiger; 1988.
  2. Whitworth J. Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices. Endod Topics 2005;12(1):2–24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00198.x.
  3. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am 1967;11(7):723–744.
  4. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endodontic Topics 2005;10(1):30–76. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x.
  5. Ribeiro FC, Souza-Gabriel AE, Marchesan MA, et al. Influence of different endodontic filling materials on root fracture susceptibility. J Dent 2008;36(1):69–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.10.007.
  6. Smyth R, Philpott B. Management of the open apex in endodontics: current techniques and new solutions when dealing with the open apex in root canal surgery. Scottish Dental Magazine 2017:7.
  7. Vier FV, Figueredo JAP. Prevalence of different periapical lesions associated with human teeth and their correlation with the presence and extension of apical external root resorption. Int Endod J 2002;35(8):710–719. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00554.x.
  8. Gutmann JL, Heaton JF. Management of the open (immature) apex. Vital teeth Int Endodon J 1981;14(3):166–172. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1981.tb01082.x.
  9. Nolla CM. The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child 1960;27:254–266.
  10. Moorrees CFA, Fanning EA, Hunt EE. Age variation of formation for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1963;42(6):1490–1502. DOI: 10.1177/00220345630420062701.
  11. Plascencia H, Diaz M, Gascon G, et al. Management of permanent teeth with necrotic pulps and open apices according to the stage of root development. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(11):e1329–e1339. DOI: 10.4317/jced.54287.
  12. Rafter M. Apexification: a review. Dent Traumatol 2005;21(1):1–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2004.00284.x.
  13. Andreasen JO, Farik B, Munksgaard EC. Long-term calcium hydroxide as a root canal may increase risk of root fracture. Dent Traumatol 2002;18(3):134–137. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00097.x.
  14. Torabinejad M, Corr R, Buhrley M, et al. An animal model to study regenerative endodontics. J Endod 2011;37(2):197–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.10.011.
  15. Hench L. Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1998;8(7):1705–1728. DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02540.x.
  16. Best SM, Porter AE, Thian ES, et al. Bioceramics: past, present and for the future. J Euro Ceram Soc 2008;28(7):1319–1327. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.12.001.
  17. Haapasalo M, Parhar M, Huang X, et al. Clinical use of bioceramic materials. Endod Topics 2015;32(1):97–117. DOI: 10.1111/etp. 12078.
  18. Shen Y, Peng B, Yang Y, et al. What do different tests tell about the mechanical and biological properties of bioceramic materials? Endod Topics 2015;32(1):47–85. DOI: 10.1111/etp.12076.
  19. El-Meligly OA, Avery DR. Comparison of apexification with mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide. Pediatr Dent 2006;28:248–253.
  20. Witherspoon DE, Small JC, Regan JD, et al. Retrospective analysis of open apex teeth obturated with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2008;34(10):1171–1176. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.005.
  21. Andreasen JO, Munksgaard EC, Bakland LK. Comparison of fracture resistance in root canals of immature sheep teeth after filling with calcium hydroxide or MTA. Dent Traumatol 2006;22(3):154–156. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00419.x.
  22. Desai S, Nicholas C. The restoration of permanent immature anterior teeth, root filled using MTA: a review. J Dent 2009;37(9):652–657. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.026.
  23. Mehmet B, Ekçi ES, Odaba ME. Efficacy of biodentine as an apical plug in Nonvital permanent teeth with open apices: an in vitro study. Bio Med Res Int 2015;2015:359275.
  24. Tuna EB, Dinçol ME, Gençay K, et al. Fracture resistance of immature teeth filled with Bioaggregate, mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide. Dent Traumatol 2011;27(3):174–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.00995.x.
  25. Osiri S, Banomyong D, Sattabanasuk V, et al. Root reinforcement after obturation with calcium silicate-based sealer and Modified gutta-percha cone. J Endod 2018;44(12):1843–1848. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.08.011.
  26. Argueta JO. BioRoot™ RCS, a reliable bioceramic material for root canal obturation. Case Studies 2017;15(54):4–8.
  27. Camilleri J. Will bioceramics be the future root canal filling materials. Curr Oral Health Rep 2017;4:228–238.
  28. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod 2007;33(4):391–398. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.009.
  29. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, et al. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002;23(13):2667–2682. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00407-0.
  30. Sharma S, Shashikala K. Cast metal post versus fiber post- A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. RGUHS-J Dent Sci 2008;1(2):1–8.
  31. Sharma S. The viability of current obturating systems as replacement endodontic monoblocks – A 3 dimensional finite element analysis. Endodontol 2014;26(2):295–300.
  32. Sonali S, Gupta SH, Anita K. A 3D finite element analysis to evaluate endodontic monoblocks. J Dent Def Sec 2014;9(2):13:19.
  33. Andreassen JO, Andreassen FM. Essentials of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1994. p. 168.
  34. Ham JW, Patterson SS, Mitchell DF. Induced apical closure of immature pulpless teeth in monkeys. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1972;33(3):438–449. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(72)90474-4.
  35. Albadri S, Chau YS, Jarad F. The use of mineral trioxide aggregate to achieve root-end closure: three case reports. Dent Traumatol 2013;29(6):469–473. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01128.x.
  36. Young CS, Terada S, Vacanti JP, et al. Tissue engineering of complex tooth structures on biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Dent Res 2002;81(10):695–700. DOI: 10.1177/154405910208101008.
  37. Kim SG, Malek M, Sigurdsson A, et al. Regenerative endodontics: a comprehensive review. Int Endod J 2018;51(12):1367–1388. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12954.
  38. Eram A, Zuber M, Keni LG, et al. Finite element analysis of immature teeth filled with MTA, biodentine and bioaggregate. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2020;190:105356. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105356.
  39. Raldi DP, Mello I, Habitante SM, et al. Treatment options for teeth with open apices and apical periodontitis. J Can Dent Assoc 2009;75(8):591–596.
  40. Jain JK, Ajagannanavar SL, Jayasheel A, et al. Management of a fractured nonvital tooth with open apex using mineral trioxide aggregate as an apical plug. Int J Oral Health Sci 2017;7(1):44–47. DOI: 10.4103/ijohs.ijohs_17_17.
  41. Rosaline H, Rajan M, Deivanayagam K, et al. Ferro-concrete reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth with wide open apex. Indian J Dent Res 2015;26(3):276–279. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290. 162888.
  42. Jaiswal S, Gupta S, Sawani S, et al. Bioactive closure of Non vital immature tooth with open apices. A contemporary approach. People's J Sci Res 2014;7(2):70–74.
  43. Torabinejad M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material. J Endod 1993;19(12):591–595. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80271-2.
  44. Dawood AE, Parashos P, Wong RHK, Reynolds EC, Manton DJ. Calcium silicate-based cements: composition, properties, and clinical applications. J Investig Clin Dent 2017;8(2):1–15.
  45. Mente J, Leo M, Panagidis D, et al. Treatment outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate in open apex teeth. J Endod 2013;39(1):20–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.007.
  46. Raghavendra SS, Jadhav GR, Gathani KM, et al. Bioceramics in endodontics – a revıew. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S128–S137. DOI: 10.17096/jiufd.63659.
  47. Mouring SE, Miller PH, Burns VL, Investigation into the Mechanical Behavior of Ceramicrete. Proceedings of The Thirteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. May 25–30. 2003. Honolulu, Hawa2, USA.
  48. Leal F, De-Deus G, Brandao C, et al. Comparison of the root-end seal provided by bioceramic repair cements and white MTA. Int Endod J 2011;44(7):662–668. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01871.x.
  49. Zhang L, Li Q-L, Cao Y, et al. Regenerating a monoblock to obturate root canals via a mineralising strategy. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):13356. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31643-8.
  50. Camilleri J, Sorrentino F, Damidot D. Characterization of unhydrated and hydrated Bioaggregate and MTA angelus. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19(3):689–698. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1292-4.
  51. Tuloglu N, Bayrak S. Comparative evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and Bioaggregate as apical barrier material in traumatized nonvital, immature teeth: a clinical pilot study. Niger J Clin Pract 2016;19(1):52–57. DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.164332.
  52. Zhang S, Yang X, Fan M. Bioaggregate and iRoot BP plus optimize the proliferation and mineralization ability of human dental pulp cells. Int Endod J 2013;46(10):923–929. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12082.
  53. Bucchi C, Marcé-Nogué J, Galler KM, et al. Biomechanical performance of an immature maxillary central incisor after revitalization: a finite element analysis. Int Endod J 2019;52(10):1508–1518. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13159.
  54. Ron AC, Karthik J, Pai VS, et al. Fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth rehabilitated with different restorative materials: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Endodontol 2017; 29(1):11.
  55. Bayram E, Bayram HM. Fracture resistance of immature teeth filled with mineral trioxide aggregate, bioaggregate, and biodentine. Eur J Dent 2016;10(2):220–224. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.178310.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.