The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Comparison of Marginal Fit of Metal Copings in Two Different States with and without Using Ring Liners: An In Vitro Study

Pankaj P Kadam, Rupali Patil, Arti Gachake, Vijaysinh More, Harshwardhan Sawant, Bhagyashree Kalsekar

Keywords : Casting, Cellulose liners, Marginal fit, Ni–Cr cast copings

Citation Information : Kadam PP, Patil R, Gachake A, More V, Sawant H, Kalsekar B. Comparison of Marginal Fit of Metal Copings in Two Different States with and without Using Ring Liners: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (11):1262-1267.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3180

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 24-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim and objective: To compare the marginal fit of Ni–Cr copings made by casting in two different states (dry and wet) with either cellulose ring liners or no ring liners. Materials and methods: An in vitro study was conducted on 40 patterns which were invested, and a burnout casting procedure was used, using a Ni–Cr alloy to obtain the cast copings. The cast copings were divested, cleaned, and run through a finishing procedure. The copings were seated on the stainless steel die and microscopically evaluated for marginal discrepancies at two predetermined reference points using an optical microscope (Rieichert, Austria). Statistical analysis was done using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Chi-square test, keeping 95% confidence intervals and having a p value of less than 0.05 statistically significant. Results: Our results identified marginal discrepancies in all the Ni–Cr cast copings, which significantly differed from each other. The copings obtained from casting with a cellulose ring liner in a wet state showed a significantly higher value followed by casting using a cellulose ring liner in a dry state. The mean marginal discrepancy values were within the clinically acceptable range for all the Ni–Cr cast copings included in two groups. Conclusion: Our study concludes that the copings cast with a cellulose ring liner in dry states had the least amount of vertical marginal discrepancies as compared to those that were cast with a ring liner in two different forms or those cast without a ring liner, suggesting that the use of cellulose ring liner in a dry state is favorable for all casting procedures. Clinical significance: Measuring gaps or discrepancies at margins is the commonly used method to determine the fit of Ni–Cr copings. In order to minimize marginal inaccuracies, various authors have suggested different methods to improve the marginal adaptation of cast restorations. There are compensation methods like setting expansion, hygroscopic expansion, and thermal expansion of the investment, which are used to assess metal shrinkage during cooling.

  1. Keyf F, Erman G. Full-crown castings made with water-saturated and dry casting ring liners. J Biomater Appl 2000;14(4):399–408. DOI: 10.1177/088532820001400406.
  2. Bjorn AL, Bjorn H, Grkovic B. Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to periodontal bone level. II. Crowns. Odontol Revy 1970;21(3): 337–346. PMID: 5275036.
  3. Schwartz IS. A review of methods and techniques to improve the fit of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56(3):279–283. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90003-x.
  4. Davis DR. Release of asbestos fibers during casting ring liner manipulation. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74(3):294–298. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80137-4.
  5. Davis DR. Effect of wet and dry cellulose ring liners on setting expansion and compressive strength of a gypsum-bonded investment. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76(5):519–523. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90011-6.
  6. Ross MA. The “asbestos” minerals: definitions, descriptions, modes of formation, physical and chemical properties, and health risks to the mining community. Nat Bur Std 1978;506:29–63.
  7. Ross MA. The geologic occurrences and health hazards of amphibole and serpentine asbestos. In: Veblen DR, editor. Reviews in mineralogy. Mineralogical Society of America; 1981. pp 279–323.
  8. Taylor NO, Paffenbarger GC. A survey of current inlay casting techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 1930;17(11):2058–2081. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1930.0311.
  9. Earnshaw R. The effect of casting ring liners on the potential expansion of a gypsmn bonded investment. J Dent Res 1988;67(11): 1366–1370. DOI: 10.1177/00220345880670110101.
  10. Haralur SB, Hamdi OA, Al-Shahrani AA, et al. The effect of casting ring liner length and prewetting on the marginal adaptation and dimensional accuracy of full crown castings. J Int Soc Prevent Community Dent 2017;7(1):52–57. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_483_16.
  11. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14(4):349–366. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8.
  12. Krithikadatta J, Gopikrishna V, Datta M. CRIS guidelines (checklist for reporting in-vitro studies): a concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(4):301–304. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.136338.
  13. Neppelenbroek KH. The clinical challenge of achieving marginal adaptation in direct and indirect restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2015;23(5):448-449. DOI: 10.1590/1678-77572015ed005.
  14. Rong Y, Luo X, Zhang Z, et al. Occupational exposure to asbestos and cardiovascular related diseases: a meta-analysis. Prev Med Rep 2015;2:920-926. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.10.005.
  15. Morey EF. Dimensional accuracy of small gold alloy castings. Part 3. Gypsum bonded investment expansion. Aust Dent J 1992;37(2):43–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb03043.x.
  16. Hutton JE, Marshall GW. Expansion of phosphate-bonded investments: Part II-Thermal expansion. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73(2):127–131. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80150-7.
  17. Anwar M, Tripathi A, Kar SK, et al. Effect of PFM firing cycles on the mechanical properties, phase composition, and microstructure of nickel-chromium alloy. J Prosthodont 2015;24(8):634–641. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12328.
  18. Kalavathi M, Sachin B, Prasanna BG, et al. Marginal accuracy of castings fabricated with ringless casting investment system and metal ring casting investment system: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(2):165-170. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1821.
  19. Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, et al. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41(11):853–874. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12205.
  20. Leong D, Chai J, Eugene L, et al. Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7(5):440–447. PMID: 7802912.
  21. Samet N, Resheff B, Gelbard S, et al. A CAD/CAM system for the production of metal copings for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73(5):457–463. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80075-7.
  22. Contreras E, Henriques G, Giolo S, et al. Fit of cast commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy crowns before and after marginal refinement by electrical discharge machining. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(5):467–472. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128954.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.