The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Correlation between Radiomorphometric Indices and Edentulous Mandibular Arches to Diagnose Osteoporosis Using Orthopantomogram in West Bengal State in India

Hemlata Dwivedi, Manjula Das, Reeta Jain

Keywords : Bone mineral density, Edentulous patient, Osteoporosis, Panoramic radiograph

Citation Information : Dwivedi H, Das M, Jain R. Correlation between Radiomorphometric Indices and Edentulous Mandibular Arches to Diagnose Osteoporosis Using Orthopantomogram in West Bengal State in India. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (2):166-171.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3030

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-12-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Aim: To assess the influence of gender and age on different parameters of alveolar bone loss using orthopantomogram. Materials and methods: Eighty subjects were enrolled in the study (20 dentulous and 60 completely edentulous), fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Completely edentulous subjects were divided into four groups (15 males and 15 females above 60 years) and (15 males and 15 females below 60 years). Dentulous group comprised 20 subjects (10 males and 10 females) between 41 and 75 years. After taking panoramic radiographs, vertical as well as horizontal reference lines were drawn. The parameters used for evaluation included mandibular cortical index (MCI), inferior mandibular cortical width (MCW), panoramic mandibular index (PMI), alveolar bone loss (ABL), and height of bone at first premolar (Hp) and first molar (Hm) of the mandible. Results: There was significant association between MCI and age for females with C2 and C3 categories being more common with advancing age. MCW was stable in all groups, except in females above 60 years of age. PMI and ABL were nonsignificant for age and gender. Although the average values of bone height (Hm and Hp) for males were higher than those of females, the results were statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Panoramic radiographic measurements could provide much valuable information and could help in evaluating patients with a low bone mineral density (BMD) with a few limitations. Clinical significance: Dental professionals could screen the patients through panoramic radiographs taken during routine clinical examination, which could help in identifying patients with a low BMD so that further treatment could be initiated early and thus to prevent a pathologic fracture.

  1. Alonso MB, Cortes AR, Camargo AJ, et al. Assessment of panoramic radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in a brazilian population. ISRN Rheumatol 2011;2011:854287. DOI: 10.5402/2011/854287.
  2. Nemati S, Kajan ZD, Saberi BV, et al. Diagnostic value of panoramic indices to predict osteoporosis and osteopenia in postmenopausal women. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2016;4(2):23–30. DOI: 10.4103/2321-3841.183820.
  3. Calciolari E, Donos N, Park JC, et al. Panoramic measures for oral bone mass in detecting osteoporosis. J Dent Res 2015;94(3):17–27. DOI: 10.1177/0022034514554949.
  4. Bhatnagar S, Krishnamurthy V, Pagare SS. Diagnostic efficacy of panoramic radiography in detection of osteoporosis in post menopausal women with low bone mineral density. J Clin Imaging Sci 2013;6(3):23. DOI: 10.4103/2156-7514.113140. PMID: 23814695; PMCID: PMC3690705.
  5. Jagelaviciene E, Krasauskiene A, Zalinkevicius R, et al. Relationship between the mandibular cortical index and calcaneal bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Medicina 2016;52:125–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.medici.2016.02.005.
  6. Devlin H, Karayianni K, Mitsea A, et al. Diagnosing osteoporosis by using dental panoramic radiographs: the osteodent project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104(6):821–828. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.12.027.
  7. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variation in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71(3):349–356. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90314-3.
  8. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kroger H. Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102(1):68–72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01156.x.
  9. Ishii K, Taguchi A, Nakamoto T, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of alveolar bone loss of the mandible for identifying postmenopausal women with femoral osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36(1):28–33. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/28366679.
  10. Hekmatin E, Ahmadi SS, Ataiekhorasgani M, et al. Prediction of lumbar spine bone mineral density from the mandibular cortical width in postmenopausal women. J Res Med Sci 2013;18(11):951–955. PMID: 24520232; PMCID:PMC3906785
  11. Khatoonabad MJ, Aghamohammadzade N, Taghilu H, et al. Relationship among panoramic radiography findings, biochemical markers of bone turnover and hip BMD in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Iran J Radiol 2011;8(1):23–28. Epub 2011 Mar 30. PMID:23329912; PMCID:PMC3522411
  12. Güler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, et al. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(10):741–746. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01499.x.
  13. Gulsahi A, Yuzugullu B, Imirzalioglu P, et al. Assessment of panoramic radiomorphometric indices of Turkish patients in different age-groups, gender and dental status. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37(5):288–292. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/19491030.
  14. Govindraju P, Chandra P. Radiomorphometric indices of the mandible – An Indicator of osteoporosis. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(3):195–198. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6844.4160.
  15. Cakur B, Dagistan S, Şahin A, et al. Reliability of mandibular cortical index and mandibular bone mineral density in the detection osteoporotic women. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38(5):255–261. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/22559806.
  16. Gaur B, Chaudhary A, Wanjari PV, et al. Evaluation of panoramic radiographs as screening tool of osteoporosis in post menopausal women: a cross sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7(9):2051–2055. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5853.3403.
  17. Ledgerton D, Horner K, Devlin H, et al. Radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in a British female population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28(3):173–181. DOI: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600435.
  18. Ziataric DK, Celebic A. Clinical bone densitometric evaluation of the mandible in removable denture wearers dependent on the morphology of the mandibular cortex. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(1):86–91. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00171-9.
  19. Dutra V, Yang J, Devlin H, et al. Mandibular bone remodeling in adults: Evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33(5):323–328. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/17685970.
  20. Yuzugullu B, Gulsahi A, Imirzalioglu P. Radiomorphometric indices and their relation to alveolar bone loss in completely edentulous Turkish patients: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101(3):160–165. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60021-4.
  21. Ziataric DK, Celebic A. Mandibular bone mineral density changes in complete and removable denture wearers: a 6-month follow- up study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(6):661–665. PMID: 14714848
  22. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Heiskanen P, et al. Panoramic mandibular index and bone mineral densities in post-menopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;75(6):774–779. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90438-a.
  23. Klemetti E, Kolmakow S. Morphology of mandibular cortex on panoramic radiographs as an indicator of bone quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26(1):22–25. DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600203.
  24. Ramalli LT, Camargo AJ, Monteiro SAC, et al. Use of panoramic radiographs to detect signs of osteoporosis in edentulous. Health 2015;7(12):1671–1677. DOI: 10.4236/health.2015.712181.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.