The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effect of Different Resin Cements on the Bond Strength of Custom-made Reinforced Glass Fiber Posts—A Push-out Study

Patrícia MC Soares, Luis FSA Morgan, Stéphanie Q Tonelli, Francisco IR Limeira, Fábio FB Bruzinga, Paulo I Seraidarian, Rodrigo C Albuquerque, Frank F Silveira

Keywords : Bond strength, Endodontically treated teeth, Glass fiber post, Push-out, Resin cements

Citation Information : MC Soares P, Morgan LF, Tonelli SQ, Limeira FI, Bruzinga FF, Seraidarian PI, Albuquerque RC, Silveira FF. Effect of Different Resin Cements on the Bond Strength of Custom-made Reinforced Glass Fiber Posts—A Push-out Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (3):219-223.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3058

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-03-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of different resin cements on the bond strength (BS) of custom-made glass fiber posts (GFPs) using the push-out test. Materials and methods: Twenty-four uniradicular bovine teeth were selected. The crowns were sectioned at the cementoenamel junction, and the root canals were treated. The post spaces of the teeth were prepared to a length of 12 mm to receive a GFP. The specimens were randomly assigned to three experimental groups (n = 8), according to the resin cement used to fix the GFPs: RelyX U200 (U200), Allcem Core (ACC), and Allcem Dual (ACD). Each specimen was sectioned into six slices per root third (cervical, middle, and apical), which were subjected to the push-out test. BS values were calculated and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis and Friedman tests. Results: There were significant differences in the middle third, according to the resin cement type used (p < 0.05). ACD showed lower BS values (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed for ACD among the thirds of the slices, with the lowest values also observed for the middle third (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The present study shows that ACC and U200 showed higher BS values compared with ACD, and were also less influenced by the depth of the root dentin. Clinical significance: The restoration of endodontically treated teeth is a challenge in dentistry, and, in most cases, will require installation of fiberglass pins. In this respect, several types of resin cements are indicated for cementation of these pins; for this reason, their adhesiveness must be adequately investigated. Conventional cements and self-adhesive cements have shown satisfactory performance in cementing the custom-made GFPs, thereby making these cements satisfactory clinical choices. The present study suggests that ACD had lower performance than the other two cements evaluated.


PDF Share
  1. Faria AC, Rodrigues RC, de Almeida Antunes RP, et al. Endodontically treated teeth: Characteristics and considerations to restore them. J Prosthodont Res 2011;55(2):69–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.003.
  2. Abreu RT, Monteiro JB, Abu-Hasna A, et al. Bond strength of cemented fiber posts to teeth with simulated internal root resorption. Clin Exp Dent 2020;12(3):e277–e284. DOI: 10.4317/jced.56568.
  3. Kaur J, Sharma N, Singh H. In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post. J Clin Exp Dent 2012;4(4):e204–e209. DOI: 10.4317/jced.50737.
  4. Jesus RH, Furlam BC, Martinusse CM, et al. Influence of acid etching on bond strength between feldspathic ceramics and resin cement. Rev Bras Odontol 2020;77(1):e1769. DOI: 10.18363/rbo.v77.2020.e1769.
  5. Eid RY, Koken S, Baba NZ, et al. Effect of fabrication technique and thermal cycling on the bond strength of CAD/CAM milled custom fit custom-made fiber-reinforced post and cores: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2019;28(8):898–905. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13101.
  6. Godas AGL, Suzuki TYU, Oliveira-Reis B, et al. Effect of glass fiber post customization on the mechanical properties of resin cement and underlying dentin. Gen Dent 2020;68(1):72–77. PMID: 31859667.
  7. Lazari PC, Oliveira RC, Anchieta RB, et al. Stress distribution on dentin-cement-post interface varying root canal and glass fiber post diameters. A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on micro-CT data. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21(6):511–517. DOI: 10.1590/1679-775720130203.
  8. Lassila L, Keulemans F, Säilynoja E, et al. Mechanical properties and fracture behavior of flowable fiber-reinforced composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2018;34(4):598–606. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.002.
  9. Benli M, Eker Gümüş B, Kahraman Y, et al. Surface characterization and bonding properties of milled polyetheretherketone dental posts. Odontology 2020;108(4):596–606. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-020-00484-1.
  10. Falakaloğlu S, Adıgüzel Ö, Özdemir G. Root canal reconstruction using biological dentin posts: a 3D finite element analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2019;13(4):274–280. DOI: 10.15171/joddd.2019.042.
  11. Wan S, Tan Y, Xie J, et al. The effect of a root-dentin pretreatment technique combining PIPS with MTAD aiming to improve the bond strength of glass fiber post. Microsc Res Tech 2020;83(7):1–10. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23474 [Epub ahead of print].
  12. Mazzoni A, Marchesi G, Cadenaro M, et al. Push-out stress for fiber posts luted using different adhesive strategies. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117(4):447–453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00656.x.
  13. Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, et al. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and prefabricated multistep systems. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102(5):306–312. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60180-3.
  14. Özlek E, Neelakantan P, Matinlinna JP, et al. Adhesion of two new glass fiber post systems cemented with self-adhesive resin cements. Dent J (Basel) 2019;7(3):80. DOI: 10.3390/dj7030080.
  15. Kahnamouei MA, Mohammadi N, Navimipour EJ, et al. Push-out bond strength of quartz fibre posts to root canal dentin using total-etch and self-adhesive resins cements. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17(2):e337–e344. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17429.
  16. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, et al. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20(10):963–971. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002.
  17. Cantoro A, Goracci C, Vichi A, et al. Retentive strength and sealing ability of new self-adhesive resin cements in fiber post luting. Dent Mater 2011;27(10):e197–e204. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.003.
  18. Yao C, Ahmed MH, Zhang F, et al. Structural/chemical characterization and bond strength of a new self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative. J Adhes Dent 2020;22(1):85–97. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a44000.
  19. Miotti LL, Follak AC, Montagner AF, et al. Is conventional resin cement adhesive performance to dentin better than self-adhesive? A systematic review and meta-analysis of laboratory studies. Oper Dent 2020;45(5):484–495. DOI: 10.2341/19-153-L [Epub ahead of print].
  20. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, et al. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000;13(5):255–260. PMID: 11764112.
  21. Onay EO, Korkma ZY, Kiremitci A. Effect of adhesive system type and root region on the push-out bond strength of glass-fiber posts to radicular dentine. Int Endond J 2009;43(4):259–268. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01643.x.
  22. Morgan LFSA, Albuquerque RC, Poletto LTA, et al. Light transmission through translucent fiber posts. J Endod 2008;34(3):299–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.007.
  23. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, et al. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2006;39(10):809–818. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01155.x.
  24. Gaston BA, West LA, Liewehr FR, et al. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001;27(5):321–324. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200105000-00001.
  25. Perdigão J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fibre posts. Dent Mater 2006;22(8):752–758. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.002.
  26. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, et al. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fibre posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002;18(8):596–602. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00003-9.
  27. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, et al. Evaluation of the adhesion of fibre posts to intraradicular dentine. Oper Dent 2005;30(5):627–635. PMID: 16268398.
  28. Soares FZ, Follak A, da Rosa LS, et al. Bovine tooth is a substitute for human tooth on bond strength studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater 2016;32(11):1385–1393. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.019.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.