The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Nickel–Titanium Rotary Instruments: An In Vitro Comparison (Torsional Resistance of Two Heat-treated Reciprocating Files)

Shilpa Bhandi, Marco Seracchiani, Orlando Donfrancesco, Rodolfo Reda, Alessandro Mazzoni, Stefania Nottola, Giuseppe Familiari, Luca Testarelli, Gianluca Gambarini

Keywords : EdgeOne Fire, Endodontics, Nickel–titanium file, Torsional resistance, WaveOne Gold

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3081

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: The present study aims to evaluate the difference in torsional resistance of two reciprocating nickel–titanium (Ni–Ti) rotary files: WaveOne Gold and EdgeOne Fire. Materials and methods: A total of 40 nickel–titanium rotary instruments (n = 40): 20 WaveOne Gold Small (WOGS) and 20 EdgeOne Fire Small (EOFS) were divided into two groups. Each instrument was tested using a torsional resistance device already validated in previous studies to evaluate and compare torsional resistance. The static torsional test was implemented by blocking each instrument at 3 mm from the tip and rotating it until fracture with a reciprocating motion. Torque to fracture (TtF) and fragment length (FL) were measured and statistically analyzed. Results: Statistical analysis of TtF found significant differences between the two groups (p <0.05). The EOFS showed higher TtF if compared to WOGS, with a mean value and a standard deviation of 3.05 ± 0.07 (N cm) against 2.97 ± 0.08 (N cm). Data for FL showed no significant differences (p >0.05) between the two groups. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it is reasonable to assert that EOFS instruments showed a higher torsional resistance if compared to the WOGS. Clinical significance: As evidenced by this study, EOFS should be considered as a safer solution, in terms of torsional resistance, if compared to WOGS, reducing the risk of intracanal separation due to excessive torsional load.


PDF Share
  1. Glossen CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, et al. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 1995;21(3):146–151. DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80441-3.
  2. Htun PH, Ebihara A, Maki K, et al. Comparison of torque, force generation and canal shaping ability between manual and nickeltitanium glide path instruments in rotary and optimum glide path motion. Odontology 2020;108(2):188–193. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-019- 00455-1.
  3. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006;32(11):1031–1043. DOI: 10.1016/j joen.2006.06.008.
  4. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, et al. Defects in rotary nickeltitanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26(3):161–165. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008.
  5. Seracchiani M, Miccoli G, Reda R, et al. A Comprehensive in vitro comparison of mechanical properties of two rotary endodontic instruments. World J Dent 2020;11(3):185-188. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1729.
  6. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, et al. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical use. J Endod 2005;31(1):40-43. DOI: 10.1097/01. don.0000132301.87637.4a.
  7. Gambarini G, Miccoli G, Di Nardo D, et al. Torsional resistance of two new heat treated nickel titanium rotary instruments: an in vitro evaluation. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr 2020;20:0053.
  8. Gambarini G, Cicconetti A, Di Nardo D, et al. Influence of different heat treatments on torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of nickeltitanium rotary files: a comparative study. Appl Sci (Switzerland) 2020;10(16):5604. DOI: 10.3390/app10165604.
  9. Di Nardo D, Gambarini G, Seracchiani M, et al. Influence of different cross]section on cyclic fatigue resistance of two nickel.titanium rotary instruments with same heat treatment: an in vitro study. Saudi Endod J 2020;10(3):221-225. DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_124_19.
  10. Ha JH, Kwak SW, Kim SK, et al. Effect from rotational speed on torsional resistance of the nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2017;43(3):443-446. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.032.
  11. Ferreira F, Adeodato C, Barbosa I, et al. Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic review. Int Endod J 2017;50(2):143-152. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12613.
  12. Kiefner P, Ban M, De-Deus G. Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments? Int Endod J 2014;47(5):430-436. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12166.
  13. Tokita D, Ebihara A, Miyara K, et al. Dynamic torsional and cyclic fracture behavior of profile rotary instruments at continuous or reciprocating rotation as visualized with high-speed digital video imaging. J Endod 2017;43(8):1337-1342. DOI: 10.1016/j joen.2017.03.024.
  14. Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, et al. Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012;38(10):1408-1411. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.019.
  15. Kwak SW, Lee CJ, Kim SK, et al. Comparison of screw-in forces during movement of endodontic files with different geometries, alloys, and kinetics. Materials (Basel) 2019;12(9):1506. DOI: 10.3390/ma12091506.
  16. Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schafer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys.a review. Int Endod J 2018;51(10):1088-1103. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12924.
  17. Gambarini G, Galli M, Di Nardo D, et al. Differences in cyclic fatigue lifespan between two different heat treated NiTi endodontic rotary instruments: WaveOne Gold vs EdgeOne Fire. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11(7):e609.e613. DOI: 10.4317/jced.55839.
  18. Di Nardo D, Seracchiani M, Mazzoni A, et al. Torque range, a new parameter to evaluate new and used instrument safety. Appl Sci 2020;10(10):3418. DOI: 10.3390/app10103418.
  19. Gambarini G, Miccoli M, D’Angelo M, et al. The relevance of operative torque and torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a preliminary clinical investigation. Saudi Endod J 2020;10:260–264. 10.4103/sej.sej_157_19.
  20. Madarati AA. Factors influencing incidents of complications while using nickel-titanium rotary instruments for root canal treatment. BMC Oral Health 2019;19(1):241. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0938-7.
  21. Miccoli G, Seracchiani M, Zanza A, et al. Possible complications of endodontic treatments. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020;21(5):473–474.
  22. Miccoli G, Seracchiani M, Del Giudice A, et al. Fatigue resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments before and after ex vivo root canal treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020;21(7):728–732.
  23. Kwak SW, Ha JH, Cheung GS, et al. Effect of the glide path establishment on the torque generation to the files during instrumentation: an in vitro measurement. J Endod 2018;44(3):496–500. DOI: 10.1016/j joen.2017.09.016.
  24. Mazzoni A, Pacifici A, Zanza A, et al. Assessment of real-time operative torque during nickel–titanium instrumentation with different lubricants. Appl Sci 2020;10(18):6201. DOI: 10.3390/app10186201.
  25. Kimura S, Ebihara A, Maki K, et al. Effect of optimum torque reverse motion on torque and force generation during root canal instrumentation with crown-down and single-length techniques. J Endod 2020;46(2):232–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.11.007.
  26. Baek SH, Lee CJ, Versluis A, et al. Comparison of torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics. J Endod 2011;37(9):1283–1286. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.032.
  27. Alcalde MP, Tanomaru-Filho M, Bramante CM, et al. Cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of reciprocating single files manufactured by different nickel-titanium alloys. J Endod 2017;43(7):1186–1191. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.008.
  28. Gambarini G, Miccoli G, Seracchiani M, et al. Role of the flat-designed surface in improving the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic NiTi rotary instruments. Materials (Basel) 2019;12(16):2523. DOI: 10.3390/ma12162523.
  29. Gambarini G, Seracchiani M, Zanza A, et al. Influence of shaft length on torsional behavior of endodontic nickel-titanium instruments. Odontology 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-020-00572-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33245455.
  30. Seracchiani M, Miccoli G, Di Nardo D, et al. Effect of flexural stress on torsional resistance of NiTi instruments. J Endod 2021;47(3):472–476. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Oct 21. PMID: 33096192.
  31. Tabassum S, Zafar K, Umer F. Nickel-titanium rotary file systems: what 's new? Eur Endod J 2019;4(3):111–117. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2019.80664.
  32. Zupancich A, Cristiani E. Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):15740. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72276-0.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.