The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

COVID-19 Pandemic and its Impact on Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Survey of Practicing Dentists

Jordan J Cimilluca, Kevin C Lee, Steven Halepas, Bridget Ferguson

Keywords : COVID-19, Personal protective equipment, Practice management

Citation Information : Cimilluca JJ, Lee KC, Halepas S, Ferguson B. COVID-19 Pandemic and its Impact on Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Survey of Practicing Dentists. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (5):473-478.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3092

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 09-07-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic impact and the dental practice changes associated with the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional survey conducted at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic (May 2020). The study sample was derived from the Columbia University College of Dental Medicine Alumni network, which included the graduating classes between 1975 and 2015. Active dental practitioners were surveyed regarding changes to their current operations and protective safety measures through a 22 closed-ended questionnaire-based survey. Results: The response rate was 17%. Nearly 70.92% of respondents laid off at least one staff member during the COVID-19 pandemic, 51.80% expressed fear of permanent closure, and 79.43% applied for a small business administration loan. There were no significant associations between the amount of time in practice and the need to lay off staff members, the fear of going out of business, or the rates of application for the small business administration loan. Many practitioners bought at least one device geared toward reducing COVID-19 transmission, such as ultraviolet (UV) lights (26.21%), extraoral suctions (37.31%), and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) air filters (54.55%). Conclusion: At the peak of the pandemic, the majority of dental providers had to reduce staff and seek financial assistance. Concurrently, many of these practices also invested in new safety equipment with the intention of reducing viral transmission. Clinical significance: External mouth suctions, commercial air purifiers, and air exchange devices might be useful in the private practice setting. However, financially strained practitioners should recognize that these devices have not currently been proven to be effective against the COVID-19 virus.


PDF Share
  1. S.3548 CARES Act, 116th US Congress Sess.; 2020.
  2. Civilian unemployment rate. US Department of Labor; 2020.
  3. How the COVID-19 recession could affect health insurance coverage [press release]. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2020.
  4. Ferneini EM. The financial impact of COVID-19 on our practice. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;78(7):1047–1048. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.045.
  5. The employment situation – April 2020 [press release]. US Department of Labor; 2020.
  6. Breslin N, Baptiste C, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, et al. COVID-19 infection among asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women: two weeks of confirmed presentations to an affiliated pair of New York City hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;100118. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100118.
  7. HPI. COVID-19: economic impact on dental practices. American Dental Association; 2020.
  8. Ferneini EM, Halepas S. Protecting ourselves during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;78(8):1227–1228. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.04.047.
  9. Ge ZY, Yang LM, Xia JJ, et al. Possible aerosol transmission of COVID-19 and special precautions in dentistry. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2020;21(5):361–368. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2010010.
  10. Szeto W, Yam WC, Huang H, et al. The efficacy of vacuum-ultraviolet light disinfection of some common environmental pathogens. BMC Infect Dis 2020;20(1):127. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-4847-9.
  11. Goodshore C. Paycheck protection program guide: coronavirus relief loans for small business: business.org; April 10, 2020. Available from: https://www.business.org/finance/loans/paychex-protection-program-guide/#PPP_Funding_Across_America_.
  12. David AP, Jiam NT, Reither JM, et al. Endoscopic skull base and transoral surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: minimizing droplet spread with a negative-pressure otolaryngology viral isolation drape (NOVID). Head Neck 2020;42(7):1577–1582. DOI: 10.1002/hed.26239.
  13. Tsai YH, Wan GH, Wu YK, et al. Airborne severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus concentrations in a negative-pressure isolation room. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27(5):523–525. DOI: 10.1086/504357.
  14. Hertel E. Über die Beeinflussung des Organismus durch Licht, speziell durch chemisch wirksame Strahlen. Zeitschr f allg Phys Bd 1904;4.
  15. Hertel E. Ueber physiologische Wirkung von Strahlen verschiedener Wellenlänge. Zeitschr f allg Physiol 1905;5:95–122.
  16. Bedell K, Buchaklian AH, Perlman S. Efficacy of an automated multiple emitter whole-room ultraviolet-C disinfection system against coronaviruses MHV and MERS-CoV. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37(5):598–599. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2015.348.
  17. Reed NG. The history of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation for air disinfection. Public Health Rep 2010;125(1):15–27. DOI: 10.1177/003335491012500105.
  18. Bruls WA, Slaper H, van der Leun JC, et al. Transmission of human epidermis and stratum corneum as a function of thickness in the ultraviolet and visible wavelengths. Photochem Photobiol 1984;40(4):485–494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1984.tb04622.x.
  19. Roberts V. To PAPR or not to PAPR? Can J Respir Ther 2014;50(3):87–90. PMID: 26078617
  20. Boskoski I, Gallo C, Wallace MB, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and personal protective equipment shortage: protective efficacy comparing masks and scientific methods for respirator reuse. Gastrointest Endosc 2020;92(3):519–523. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.048.
  21. Teanpaisan R, Taeporamaysamai M, Rattanachone P, et al. The usefulness of the modified extra-oral vacuum aspirator (EOVA) from household vacuum cleaner in reducing bacteria in dental aerosols. Int Dent J 2001;51(6):413–416. DOI: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.2001.tb00853.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.