The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Influence of Filler Composition on the Refractive Index of Four Different Enamel Shades of Composite Resins

Rafael S Beolchi, Deepak Mehta, Bruno Pelissier, Luis A Gênova, Anderson Z Freitas, Shilpa H Bhandi

Keywords : Dental composites, Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, Filler composition, Optical coherence tomography, Refractive index

Citation Information : Beolchi RS, Mehta D, Pelissier B, Gênova LA, Freitas AZ, Bhandi SH. Influence of Filler Composition on the Refractive Index of Four Different Enamel Shades of Composite Resins. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (5):557-561.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3040

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 09-07-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure the refractive index of four commercially available enamel resin composites, using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and their relationship with the atomic composition of the composite resin fillers utilizing an energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (EDX). Materials and methods: Four different enamel composites, namely Enamel HRi color UE3, Enamel HFO color GE3, Vit-l-escence color Pearl Frost, and Amelogen Plus color Enamel White were tested. For each composite, disks with different thicknesses were fabricated and then light-cured according to the manufacturer\'s instructions. The disks were then stored in deionized water under 36.5 °C for at least 7 days. Each of the samples from the four different groups was measured in five distinctive points to analyze the optical and physical length using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Elemental analysis of all four different enamel shades of the composite was done using an EDX. Results: The filler contents showed interesting differences in elemental composition and concentration; however, Si seemed to be a common filler component. The HRi composite presented a distinctive composition compared to other materials and was the only composite that showed a smaller percentage of SiO2, and also was the only composite that contained compounds, such as P2O5, ZnO, CaO, La2O3, and V2O5. The optical coherence tomography analysis showed the refractive index values of all tested enamel composites. Among the four different enamel composite resins tested, the enamel HRi composite demonstrated the most ideal refractive index to mimic natural enamel. Conclusion: The enamel HRi composite demonstrated a distinctive filler composition and this could be the main reason behind its higher refractive index. Nonetheless, it remains unclear how much of an impact this feature has in the final esthetic outcome of anterior composite restorations, where many other optical phenomena are also important. Clinical significance: The clinical success of any esthetic restorative procedure depends on diagnosing the proper treatment plan and also on executing this treatment with the right materials. On direct esthetic restorations, knowing the optical properties of such materials is fundamental, as they should be able to replicate both natural enamel and dentin.


PDF Share
  1. Jaarda MJ, Lang BR, Wang RF, et al. Measurement of composite resin filler particles by using scanning electron microscopy and digital imaging. J Prosthet Dent1993;69(4):416–424. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90191-P.
  2. Zandinejad AA, Atai M, Pahlevan A. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites. Dent Mater 2006;22(4):382–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.027.
  3. da Silva GR, Simamto-Junior PC, da Mota AS, et al. Mechanical properties of light-curing composites polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. Dent Mater 2007;26(2):217–223. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.217.
  4. Wilson NH, Dunne SM, Gainford ID. Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. Part 2: Resin composites systems. Int Dent J 1997;47(4):185–193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.1997.tb00448.x.
  5. Asaka Y, Miyazaki M, Aboshi H, et al. A EDX fluorescence analysis and SEM observations of resin composites. J Oral Science 2004;46(3):143–148. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.46.143.
  6. Wang XJ, Milner TE, de Boer JF, et al. Characterization of dentin and enamel by use of optical coherence tomography. Appl Opt 1999;38(10):2092–2096. DOI: 10.1364/AO.38.002092.
  7. Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, et al. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23(2):73–87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00392.x.
  8. Schrenk WJ, Wheatley JA, Lewis RA, et al. Nanolayer polymeric optical films. TAPPI 1991 Polymers, laminations and coatings conference. Norcross, GA: TAPPI; 1991. pp. 233–240.
  9. Meng Z, Yao H, Liang Y, et al. Measurement of the refractive index of human teeth by optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 2009;14(3):034010. DOI: 10.1117/1.3130322.
  10. Haaruna m, Ohmi m, Mitsuyama t, et al. Simultaneous measurement of the phase and group indices and the thickness of transparent plates by low coherence interferometry. Opt Lett 1998;23(12):966–968. DOI: 10.1364/OL.23.000966.
  11. Tearney GJ, Brezinski M, Southern JF, et al. Determination of the refractive index of highly scattering human tissue by optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 1995;120(21):2258–2260. DOI: 10.1364/OL.20.002258.
  12. Freitas AZ, Amaral MM, Raele MP. Optical coherence tomography: development and applications. Laser Pulse Phenomena and Applications, D.F.J. Duarte, ed. Intech; 2010. pp. 409–432. DOI: 10.5772/12899.
  13. Yong-Keun L. Influence of filler on the difference between the transmitted and reflected colors of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 2008;24(9):1243–1247. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.014.
  14. Tarumi H, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y. Relationship between particle size of barium glass filler and water sorption of light cured composite resin. Dent Mater J 1995;14(1):37–44. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.14.37.
  15. Fukushima Y, Araki T, Yamada MO. Topography of fluorescence and its possible composites in human teeth. Cell Mol Biol 1987;33(6):725–736.
  16. Zijp JR. Optical properties of dental hard tissues. University of Groningen: s.n. 2001.
  17. Watts DC, Cash AJ. Analysis of optical transmission by 400–500 nm visible light into aesthetic dental biomaterials. J Dent 1994;22(2):112–117. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(94)90014-0.
  18. Baumgartner A, Dichtl S, Hitzenberger CK, et al. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography of dental structures. Caries Res 2000;34(1):59–69. DOI: 10.1159/000016571.
  19. Brodbelt RH, O'brien WJ, Fan PL, et al. Translucency of human dental enamel. J Dent Res 1981;60(10):1749–1753. DOI: 10.1177/00220345810600100401.
  20. Zijp JR, ten bosch JJ, Groenhuis RAJ. HeNe-laser light scattering by human dental enamel. J Dent Res 1995;74(12):1891–1898. DOI: 10.1177/00220345950740121301.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.