The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle Incorporated in Composite Resin as a Core Restorative Material

Dhanasekaran Sihivahanan, Venugopal V Nandini

Keywords : Composite resin, Core material, Mechanical properties, Nanoparticle, Strength, Titanium dioxide

Citation Information : Sihivahanan D, Nandini VV. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle Incorporated in Composite Resin as a Core Restorative Material. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (6):686-690.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3105

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 09-08-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To compare and evaluate the mechanical properties of 2.5% titanium dioxide nanoparticle (TiO2 NP) incorporated as filler in an experimental composite resin with everX Flow and MultiCore Flow. Materials and methods: TiO2 was prepared and incorporated into experimental dental composite resin. The experimental and traditional composite resin was grouped as follows: Group I: The experimental composite resin with 2.5% of TiO2 fillers, Group II: everX Flow (GC EUROPE), and Group III: MultiCore Flow (Ivoclar Vivadent). Based on International Standards Organization (ISO) 4049, the samples were prepared for the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural test. Results: Statistical analysis was done, and the results were tabulated. Compared to the other tested materials, the experimental composite resin had relatively high compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and flexural strength. Compared to MultiCore Flow, the everX Flow showed strong mechanical properties. Conclusion: Based on the result of the study, it can be concluded that the 2.5% TiO2 NP incorporated as filler in an experimental composite resin demonstrated higher mechanical properties compared to the conventional material. Clinical significance: The unique photoactivities of TiO2 NP and their superior mechanical properties make them one of the ideal additives to enhance the performance of polymeric materials.


PDF Share
  1. Sharma V, Kumar S, Monga P. Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2009;12(4):154–159. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.58338.
  2. Magne P, Goldberg J, Edel hoff D, et al. Composite resin core buildups with and without post for the restoration of endodontically treated molars without ferrule. Oper Dent 2016;41(1):64–75. DOI: 10.2341/14-258-L.
  3. Agrawal A, Mala K. An in vitro comparative evaluation of physical properties of four different types of core materials. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(3):230–233. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.131782.
  4. Marković D, Petronijević B, Blažić L, et al. Bond strength comparison of three core build-up materials used to restore maxillary incisor teeth. Contemp Mater 2011;2(1):62–68. DOI: 10.5767/anurs.cmat.110201.en.062M.
  5. Koçak MM, Cengiz S, Koçak S. Bond strength of resin composites used as core materials around different types of fiber posts. Int J Exp Dent Sci 2012;1(2):81–83. DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10029-1020.
  6. Elbatanony M, Saniour S, Niazy M, et al. Effect of silanized silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles loading on the compressive strength of prepared composite core material. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls 2019;6(2):131–136. DOI:10.21608/adjg.2019.41964.
  7. Shirkavad S, Moslehifard E. Effect of TiO2nanoparticles on tensile strength of dental acrylic resins. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2014;8(4):197–203. DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2014.036.
  8. Cibim DD, Saito MT, Giovani PA, et al. Novel nanotechnology of TiO2 improves physical-chemical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement. Int J Biomater2017;7(12):1–11. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7123919.
  9. Venkatasubbu GD, Ramasamy S, Avadhani GS, et al. Size-mediated cytotoxicity of nanocrystalline titanium dioxide, pure and zinc-doped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in human hepatoma cells. J Nanoparticle Res 2012;14(4):819–837. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-0819-3.
  10. Gowda S, Quadras DD, Sesappa SR, et al. Comparative evaluation of fracture strength of different types of composite core build-up materials: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(5): 507–514. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2291
  11. Garlapati TG, Krithikadatta J, Natansabapathy V. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber composite used as a core material — an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61(4):464–470. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.02.001.
  12. Iqbal M, Hussain J, Kadu MD, et al. Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of four recent core build up materials: an in vitro study. World J Pharm Res 2017;3(10):151–155. DOI: 10.5958/2320-5962.2018.00006.2
  13. Kumar G, Shivrayan A. Comparative study of mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6(1):16–20. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.149285.
  14. Salehian H, Jenabali Jahromi SA. Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on mechanical properties of vinyl ester-based nanocomposites. J Compos Mater 2015;49(19):2365–2373. DOI: 10.1177/0021998314546140.
  15. Bijelic-Donova J, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, et al. Mechanical properties, fracture resistance, and fatigue limitsof short fiber reinforced dental composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115(1):95–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.012.
  16. Panitiwat P, Salimee P. Effect of different composite core materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with FRC posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25(2):203–210. DOI: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0306.
  17. Sun J, Forster AM, Johnson PM, et al. Improving performance of dental resins by adding titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Dent Mater 2011;27(10):972–982. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.06.003.
  18. Abouelleil H, Pradelle N, Villat C, et al. Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composites. Restor Dent Endod 2015;40(4):262–270. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.262.
  19. Alkhudhairy F, Vohra F. Compressive strength and the effect of duration after photo-activation among dual-cure bulk fill composite core materials. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32(5):1199–1203. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.325.10727.
  20. Meshref AA, Mazen AA, El-Giushi MA, et al. Relationship between titanium dioxide nanoparticles and compressive properties of dental composite resin. J. Elastomers Plast 2020;5(1):33–37.
  21. Warangkulkasemkit S, Pumpaluk P. Comparison of physical properties of three commercial composite core buildup materials. Dent Mater J 2019;38(2):177–181. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2018-038.
  22. Yu B, Ahn JS, Lim JI, et al. Influence of TiO2 nanoparticles on the optical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater 2009;25(9):1142–1147. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.012.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.