The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Dental Occlusion: Proposal for a Classification to Guide Occlusal Analysis and Optimize Research Protocols

Casazza Estelle, Ré Jean-Philippe, Giraudeau Anne, Parfu Anne, Orthlieb Jean-Daniel

Keywords : Dysfunctions, Malocclusion, Occlusal functions, Occlusion

Citation Information : Estelle C, Jean-Philippe R, Anne G, Anne P, Jean-Daniel O. Dental Occlusion: Proposal for a Classification to Guide Occlusal Analysis and Optimize Research Protocols. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (7):840-849.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3113

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: Dental occlusion often rhymes with confusion, discrediting many research protocols. The profession seems to be in “major chaos about occlusion.” This may be due to the lack of a precise classification of occlusal dysfunctions. We suggest using a classification based on the separation of three occlusal functions, with the identification of precise, objective clinical diagnostic criteria. This article aims to define a precise classification of occlusal functions, in order to be able to establish a positive diagnosis of occlusal disorders. This occlusal analysis method could then be used in the daily practice of dentists and orthodontists, with a view to align epidemiological studies that focus on occlusion, in order to obtain results capable of comparison in different studies. Materials and methods: A analysis of the literature in PubMed database published between the early 1970s and the present day identified many confusing definitions of occlusal disorders. In this paper, we propose the separation of occlusal functions into three subcategories: Stabilizing, centering, and guiding functions, defining three different subcategories of occlusal disorder. Results: Occlusal function allows the definition of three kinds of malocclusion: Stabilizing dysfunction, centering dysfunction, and guiding dysfunction. The individualization of clear subcategories could allow the study of the more pertinent impacts of pathogenic malocclusion. Conclusion: This classification of occlusal functions or dysfunctions allows lines to be drawn between different occlusal situations that are frequently confused, such as a loss of posterior occlusal support and loss of occlusal vertical dimension, infra-occlusion and loss of posterior support, short or reduced dental arch, reversed and scissor occlusion, sagittally and transversely deflected mandible, posterior occlusal interference and balancing contact, as well as natural and iatrogenic malocclusion. Clinical significance: An occlusal analysis that makes use of the three occlusal functions, “stabilizing, centering, guiding,” could offer diagnostic standardization. It may also allow the avoidance of incorrect interpretations. Therefore, this occlusal function classification may be relevant to many fields, for instance, for epidemiological studies of occlusion and the periodontium, TMD and occlusion, or TMD and orthodontic treatment.

  1. Manfredini D, Lombardo L, Siciliani G. Temporomandibular disorders and dental occlusion. A systematic review of association studies: end of an era? J Oral Rehabil 2017;44(11):908–923. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12531.
  2. Turp JC, Greene CS, Strub JR. The dental occlusion: a critical reflection on past, present and future concepts. J Oral Rehab 2008;35:502–512. DOI: 10.1111/j.0305-182X.2007.01820.x.
  3. Steenks MH. The gap between dental education and clinical treatment in temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(7):475–477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01711.x.
  4. Christensen C. Occlusion confusion. Dentaltown 2006;7(4):8–14.
  5. The glossary of prosthodontic terms: ninth edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:e1–e105. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001.
  6. Forssell H, Kalso E. Application of principles of evidence-based Medicine to occlusal treatment for Temporomandibular disorders: are there lessons to be learned. J Orofac Pain 2004;18(1):9–22. PMID: 15022533.
  7. Skármeta N. Occlusal stability and mandibular stability: the major part of dentistry we are still neglecting. Cranio 2017;35(4):201–203. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2017.1329686.
  8. de Kanter RJAM, Battistuzzi PGFCM, Truin GJ. Temporomandibular disorders: “Occlusion” Matters! Pain Res Manag 2018;2018:8746858. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8746858.
  9. Möller E, Sheikholeslam A, Lous I. Response of elevator activity during mastication to treatment of functional disorders. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92(1):64–83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00861.x.
  10. Ferrario VF, Serrao G, Dellavia C, et al. Relationship between the number of occlusal contacts and masticatory muscle activity in healthy young adults. Cranio J Craniomandib Pract 2002;20(2):91–98. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2002.11746196.
  11. Forrester SE, Allen SJ, Presswood RG, et al. Neuromuscular function in healthy occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37(9):663–669. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02097.x
  12. Kaidonis JA, Ranjitkar S, Lekkas D, et al. Functional dental occlusion: an anthropological perspective and implications for practice. Aust Dent J 2014;59(Suppl. 1):162–173. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12133.
  13. Kaifu Y, Kasai K, Towsend G, et al. Tooth wear and the “design” of the human dentition: A perspective from evolutionary medicine. Yearb Phys Anthropol 2003;46:47–61. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10329.
  14. Michelotti A, Iodice G, Piergentili M, et al. Incidence of temporomandibular joint clicking in adolescents with and without unilateral posterior cross-bite: a 10-year follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil 2016;43(1):16–22. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12337.
  15. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 7th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2014. 575 p.
  16. Oberg T, Carlsson G, Fajers C. A morphologie study on a human autopsy material. Acta Odontol Scand 1971;29(3):349–384. DOI: 10.3109/00016357109026526.
  17. Hansson T. Temporomandibular joint changes related to dental occlusion. In: Temporomandibular joint problems biology, diagnosis and treatment. Quintessence Publishing Co. ed; 1980.
  18. Bates RE, Gremillion HA, Stewart CM. Degenerative joint disease. Part I: diagnosis and management considerations. Cranio 1993;11(4):284–290. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1993.11677980.
  19. Bates RE, Gremillion HA, Stewart CM. Degenerative joint disease. Part II: symptoms and examination findings. Cranio 1994;12(2):88–92. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1994.11678000.
  20. He SS, Deng X, Wamalwa P, et al. Correlation between centric relation–maximum intercuspation discrepancy and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Acta Odontol Scand 2010;68(6):368–376. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2010.517552.
  21. Wang C, Yin X. Occlusal risk factors associated with temporomandibular disorders in young adults with normal occlusions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114(4):419–423. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.10.039.
  22. Slavicek R. The masticatory organ : functions and dysfunctions. Gamma edit. Klosterneuburg, Austria; 2002.
  23. Türp JC, Schindler H. The dental occlusion as a suspected cause for TMDs: epidemiological and etiological considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39(7):502–512. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02304.x.
  24. Manfredini D, Stellini E, Gracco A, et al. Orthodontics is temporomandibular disorder–neutral. Angle Orthod 2015;86(4):649–654. DOI: 10.2319/051015-318.1.
  25. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA. Quantification and validation of predictive values of occlusal variables in temporomandibular disorders using a multifactorial analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(1):66–75. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70090-4.
  26. Sousa ST de, Mello VVC de, Magalhães BG, et al. The role of occlusal factors on the occurrence of temporomandibular disorders. Cranio 2015;33(3):211–216. DOI: 10.1179/2151090314Y.0000000015
  27. Manfredini D, Perinetti G, Stellini E, et al. Prevalence of static and dynamic dental malocclusion features in subgroups of temporomandibular disorder patients: implications for the epidemiology of the TMD-occlusion association. Quintessence Int 2015;46(4):341–349. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a32986.
  28. Rosner D, Goldberg GF. Condylar retruded contact position and intercuspal position in dentulous patients. Part II: patients classified by amnestic questionnaire. J Prosth Dent 1986;56(3):359–368. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90020-x.
  29. Suzuki K, Mito T, Ishizaki K, et al. Mandibular lateral translation during symmetric mandibular function in relation to patterns of intracapsular derangement of TMJ. J Stomat OccMed 2009;2(1):16–23. DOI: 10.1007/s12548-009-0003-2.
  30. Mito T, Ishiazaki K, Suzuki K, et al. Mandibular lateral translation during symmetric mandibular movement. J Stomat OccMed 2009;2:24–31. DOI: 10.1007/s12548-009-0004-1.
  31. Ogawa T, Ogawa M, Koyano K. Different responses of masticatory movements after alteration of occlusal guidance related to individual movement pattern. J Oral Rehab 2001;28(9):830–841. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00672.x.
  32. Williamson EH, Lundquist DO. Anterior guidance: its effect on EMG activity od the temporal and masseter muscles. J Prosth Dent 1983;49(6):816–822. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90356-6.
  33. Gausch K, Kulmer S. The role of retro-disclusion in the treatment of the TMJ patient. J Oral Rehabil 1977;4(1):29–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1977.tb00960.x.
  34. Gausch K, Kulmer S, Moser F, et al. Richtlinien der ARGE prothetik und gnathologie für eine zeitgemässe diagnostik des kau-sytems. Osterr Zahnärzte-Ztg 1979;(31):31:12–16.
  35. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Ralph JP. Stress transfer to mandible during anterior guidance and group function eccentric movements. J Prosth Dent 1979;41(1):35–39. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90353-6.
  36. Miralles R, Manns A, Nass X, et al. Influence of protrusive functions on electromyographic activity of elevator muscles. Cranio 1987;5(4):324–332. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1987.11678207.
  37. Koyano K, Tsukiyama K, Kuwatsuru R. Rehabilitation of occlusion – science or art? J Oral Rehabil 2012;39(7):513–521. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02303.x.
  38. Clark GT, Tsukiyama Y, Baba K, et al. Sixty-eight years of experimental occlusal interference studies: what have we learned? J Prosthet Dent 1999;82(6):704–713. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70012-0.
  39. Michelotti A, Farella M, Gallo L, et al. Effect of occlusal interferences on habitual activity of human masseter. J Dent Res 2005;84(7):644–648. DOI: 10.1177/154405910508400712.
  40. Marklund S, Wänman A. A century of controversy regarding the benefit or detriment of occlusal contacts on the mediotrusive side. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27(7):553–562. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00629.x.
  41. Seligman DA, Pullinger. Association of occlusal variables among refined TM patient diagnostic groups. J Craniomandib Disord 1989;3(4):227–236. PMID: 2639160.
  42. Marklund S, Wänman A. A century of controversy regarding the benefit or detriment of occlusal contacts on the mediotrusive side. J Oral Rehab 2000;27(7):553–562. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00629.x.
  43. Ramfjord S. Bruxism, a clinical and electromyographic study. J Am Dent Ass 1961;62:21–44. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1961.0002.
  44. Posselt U. Physiologie de l'occlusion et réhabilitation. Paris: J. Prélat; 1968. 358 p.
  45. Ingervall B. Tooth contacts on the functionnal and non functionnal side in children and youngs adults. Arch Oral Biol 1972;17:191–195. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(72)90147-1.
  46. Minagi S, Watanabe H, Sato TTH. The relationship between balancing-side occlusal contact patterns and TM joint sounds in humans. J Craniomandib Disord 1990;4(4):251–256. PMID: 2098402.
  47. Minagi S, Ortsuki H, Sato T, et al. Effects of balancing-side occlusion on the ipsilateral TMJ dynamics under clenching. J Oral Rehab 1997;24(1):57–61. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00431.x.
  48. Isberg AM, Isacsson G. Tissue reactions of the temporomandibular joint following retrusive guidance of the mandible. Cranio 1986;4(2):143–148. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1986.11678139.
  49. Toubol JP, Michel JF. Le mouvement initial de Bennett: expérimentation clinique, conséquences thérapeutiques. Cah Proth 1983;(42):69–87. PMID: 6590102.
  50. Ogawa M, Ogawa T, Koyano K, et al. Effect of altered canine guidance on condylar movement during laterotrusion. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11(2):139–144. PMID: 9709603.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.