The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 9 ( September, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Efficiency of Supplementary Contemporary Single-file Systems in Removing Filling Remnants from Oval-shaped Canals: An In Vitro Study

Neveen A Shaheen, Nahla G Elhelbawy, Dalia A Sherif

Keywords : Filling remnants, Oval-shaped canal, TruNatomy, WaveOne Gold, XP-endo Finisher R

Citation Information : Shaheen NA, Elhelbawy NG, Sherif DA. Efficiency of Supplementary Contemporary Single-file Systems in Removing Filling Remnants from Oval-shaped Canals: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2021; 22 (9):1055-1059.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3198

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 06-01-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: This study investigated the performance of supplementary three single-file systems for eliminating root filling residue from oval-shaped canals utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: Thirty single-rooted human mandibular premolars with oval-shaped canals were chosen. After decoronation and working length determination, ProTaper Universal (PTUR) rotary files were used to prepare canals up to F3. Irrigation was fulfilled by 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and lastly distilled water. By utilizing the lateral compaction technique, canals were filled by gutta-percha and Endosequence BC Sealer. The PTUR retreatment system (D1, D2, and D3) eliminated the primary filling material sequentially. Subsequently, specimens were categorized into three groups at random: group I: WaveOne Gold (WOG) primary file, group II: TruNatomy (TRN) medium file, and group III: XP-endo Finisher R (XPF-R). The volume of residual left from filling material was quantified utilizing CBCT imaging before and after the supplementary retreatment. Statistical analyses were done by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey\'s test at a 5% significance level. Results: The volume of removed root filling after using XPF-R was significantly higher than using WOG in all sections and TRN in the coronal third, while nonsignificantly higher than using TRN in the apical and middle. Conclusion: XPF-R as a supplementary technique revealed the highest percentage reduction of root filling material (73.13%) in comparison with the other systems (37.39% WOG and 44.16% TRN) in oval-shaped canals. Clinical significance: Neither one of the methods and tools used to remove filling material from oval-shaped root canals is perfectly efficient. The performance of supplementary techniques using contemporary single-file systems improves the cleaning and reshaping of root canal space that permits a proper disinfection to optimize the outcome of retreatment option.

  1. Nair P. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J 2006;39(4):249–281. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01099.x. PMID: 16584489.
  2. Hülsmann M, Drebenstedt S, Holscher C. Shaping and filling root canals during root canal re-treatment. Endod Topics 2011;19(1): 74–124. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2011.00264.x.
  3. Cavenago B, Ordinola-Zapata R, Duarte M, et al. Efficacy of xylene and passive ultrasonic irrigation on remaining root filling material during retreatment of anatomically complex teeth. Int Endod J 2014;47(11):1078–1083. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12253.
  4. Gorni F, Gagliani M. The outcome of endodontic retreatment: a 2-yr follow-up. J Endod J 2004;30(1):1–4. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200401000-00001.
  5. Silva E, Belladonna F, Carapiá M, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal retreatments performed by undergraduate students using different techniques. Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(1):e5. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e5.
  6. Silva E, Belladonna F, Zuolo A, et al. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and XP-endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J 2018;51(1):86–91. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12788.
  7. de Siqueira Zuolo A, Zuolo M, da Silveira Bueno C, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of TRUShape and Reciproc file systems in the removal of root filling material: an ex vivo micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 2016;42(2):315–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.005.
  8. Kaşıkçı Bilgi I, Köseler I, Güneri P, et al. Efficiency and apical extrusion of debris: a comparative ex vivo study of four retreatment techniques in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2017;50(9):910–918. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12708.
  9. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Three-dimensional evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. J Endod 2008;34(11):1370–1373. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.024.
  10. Roggendorf M, Legner M, Ebert J, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of residual material in canals filled with Activ GP or GuttaFlow following removal with NiTi instruments. Int Endod J 2010;43:200–209. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01659.x.
  11. Abramovitz I, Relles-Bonar S, Baransi B, et al. The effectiveness of a self-adjusting file to remove residual gutta-percha after retreatment with rotary files. Int Endod J 2012;45(4):386–392. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01988.x.
  12. Ma J, Al-Ashaw A, Shen Y, et al. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from oval root canals: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2012;38(11):1516–1520. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.001.
  13. Rödig T, Hausdörfer T, Konietschke F, et al. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals–a micro-computed tomography study. Int Endod J 2012;45(6):580–589. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02014.x.
  14. Özyürek T. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne, and WaveOne Gold Nickel-Titanium Instruments. J Endod 2016;42(10):1536–1539. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.019.
  15. Kapasi K, Kesharani P, Kansara P, et al. In vitro comparative evaluation of efficiency of XP-endo shaper, XP-endo finisher, and XP-endo finisher-R files in terms of residual root filling material, preservation of root dentin, and time during retreatment procedures in oval canals–a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Conserv Dent 2020;23(2):145–151. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_257_20.
  16. Gavini G, Caldeira CL, Akisue E, et al. Resistance to flexural fatigue of Reciproc R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement. J Endod 2012;38(5):684–687. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.033.
  17. Bago I, Plotino G, Katic M, et al. Evaluation of filling material remnants after basic preparation, apical enlargement, and final irrigation in retreatment of severely curved root canals in extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2020;53(7):962–973. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13287.
  18. Azim A, Wang H, Tarrosh M, et al. Comparison between single-file rotary systems: Part 1–efficiency, effectiveness, and adverse effects in endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2018;44(11):1720–1724. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.022.
  19. Machado A, Guilherme B, Provenzano J, et al. Effects of preparation with the Self-Adjusting File, TRU Shape and XP-endo Shaper systems, and a supplementary step with XP-endo Finisher R on filling material removal during retreatment of mandibular molar canals. Int Endod J 2019;52(5):709–715. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13039.
  20. Aksel H, Küçükkaya Eren S, Askerbeyli Örs S, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of the removal of root fillings using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment system supplemented by the XP-Endo Finisher file. Int Endod J 2019;52(7):1070–1076. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13094.
  21. Tavares S, Gomes C, Marceliano-Alves M, et al. Supplementing filling material removal with XP-Endo Finisher R or R1-Clearsonic ultrasonic insert during retreatment of oval canals from contralateral teeth. Aust Endod J 2021;47(2):188–194. DOI: 10.1111/aej.12451.
  22. De-Deus G, Belladonna F, Zuolo A, et al. XP-endo Finisher R instrument optimizes the removal of root filling remnants in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J 2019;52(6):899–907. DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2021.01.009.
  23. Van der Vyver P, Vorster M, Peters O. Minimally invasive endodontics using a new single-file rotary system. Int Dent–African Ed 2019;9(4): 6–20. Available from:
  24. Dentsply Sirona. TruNatomy Brochure [Internet]. Johnson (TN): Dentsply Sirona; 2010. Available from:
  25. Riyahi M, Bashiri A, Alshahrani K, et al. Cyclic fatigue comparison of TruNatomy, Twisted File, and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems. Int J Dent 2020:3190938. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3190938.
  26. De-Deus G, Marins J, Silva E, et al. Accumulated hard tissue debris produced during reciprocating and rotary nickel-titanium canal preparation. J Endod 2015;41(5):676–681. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.028.
  27. Wu M, Wesselink P. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 2001;34(2):137–141. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00361.x.
  28. Robinson J, Lumley P, Cooper P, et al. Reciprocating root canal technique induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by 3-dimensional micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2013;39(8):1067–1070. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.003.
  29. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, et al. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012;45(5):449–461. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x.
  30. Hülsmann M, Peters O, Dummer P. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics 2005;10(1):30–76. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.