The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 10 ( October, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Rehabilitation of Patients with Compromised Ridge Support Using Immediately Loaded Corticobasal Implant-supported Prostheses: A Prospective Observational Study

Fadia Awadalkreem, Nadia Khalifa, Asim Satti, Ahmed Mohamed Suliman

Keywords : Compromised ridge support, Corticobasal implant, Fixed implant-supported prosthesis, Immediate loading

Citation Information : Awadalkreem F, Khalifa N, Satti A, Suliman AM. Rehabilitation of Patients with Compromised Ridge Support Using Immediately Loaded Corticobasal Implant-supported Prostheses: A Prospective Observational Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (10):971-978.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3416

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 07-03-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction following the use of fixed immediately loaded corticobasal implant-supported prostheses. Materials and methods: One hundred and seventy-four corticobasal implants (basal cortical screw, BCS implant design) were inserted in 20 consecutive patients with compromised ridge support. Implant survival and success were assessed using the James–Misch implant health quality scale and the Albrektsson criteria for implant success. The peri-implant health was evaluated at 1 week and 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Moreover, the radiographic and prosthetic parameters and patient satisfaction were assessed. Results: The implants showed optimum implant health and a 100% survival rate with none (0%) of the implants failing, mobile, lost, or fractured. Using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, significant decreases in both the modified gingival indexes and the probable pocket depth (PPD) and slight significant increases in the plaque index (PI) at 3, 9, 12, and 18 months and a nonsignificant increase at 6-month follow-up were reported with a range of 0–1. The calculus index (CI) was zero at all follow-up visits. Radiographic evaluations revealed increases in the bone-to-implant contact. Evaluation of the prostheses showed some treatable complications, and all the patients were satisfied. Conclusion: The use of corticobasal implant-supported prosthesis meets the patient's demand for an immediate, fixed treatment modality, with high survival and success rates, optimum peri-implant soft tissue health, and high reported satisfaction. Clinical significance: Corticobasal implants can improve the patient's esthetic, phonetic, mastication, and quality of life with the advantage of eliminating the need of bone grafting procedures.

HTML PDF Share
  1. Misch CE, Wang HL, Misch CM, et al. Rationale for the application of immediate load in implant dentistry: Part I. Implant Dent 2004;13(3):207–217. DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000140461.25451.31.
  2. Iyer M, Mantena SR, Gottumukkala SN, et al. Implant failures—Diagnosis and management. Int J Clin Implant Dent 2015;1(2):51–59. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10004-1034.
  3. Tawse-Smith A. Age and oral health: Current considerations. Braz Oral Res,2007;21(1):29–33, 2007. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242007000500006.
  4. Ragucci GM, Elnayef B, Suárez-López Del Amo F, et al. Influence of exposing dental implants into the sinus cavity on survival and complications rate: A systematic review. Int J Implant Dent 2019;5(1):6. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-019-0157-7.
  5. Ali SA, Karthigeyan S, Deivanai M, et al. Implant rehabilitation for atrophic maxilla: A review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014;14(3): 196–207. DOI: 10.1007/s13191-014-0360-4.
  6. Lorenz J, Blume M, Korzinskas T, et al. Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study. Int J Implant Dent 2019 22;5(1):3. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-018-0155-1.
  7. Varghese KG, Gandhi N, Kurian N, et al. Rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla by using quad zygomatic implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2021:S0022-3913(21)00628-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.007. (Epub ahead of print).
  8. Chan MH, Nudell YA. All-on-4 Concept Update. Dent Clin North Am 2021;65(1):211–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2020.09.014.
  9. Lazarov A. Immediate Functional Loading: Results for the Concept of the Strategic Implant®. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019;9(1):78–88. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_250_18.
  10. Ihde S. Indications and treatment modalities with corticobasal jaw implants. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019;9(2):379–386. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_142_19.
  11. Pałka ŁR, Lazarov A. Immediately loaded bicortical implants inserted in fresh extraction and healed sites in patients with and without a history of periodontal disease. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019;9(2):371–378. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_147_19.
  12. Ahmad AG, Osman M, Awadalkreem F. Full-mouth rehabilitation of a patient with cleidocranial dysplasia using immediately loaded basal implant-supported fixed prostheses: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2019;65:344–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.11.005.
  13. Osman M, Ahmad AG, Awadalkreem F. A novel approach for rehabilitation of a subtotal maxillectomy patient with immediately loaded basal implant-supported prosthesis: 4 years follow-up. Case Rep Dent 2020 6;2020:9650164. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9650164.
  14. Awadalkreem F, Khalifa N, Ahmad AG, et al. Rehabilitation of marginal mandibulectomy patients using immediately loaded basal implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol 2022;34(1):24–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoms.2021.07.002.
  15. Scortecci G. Basal Implantology. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44873-2.
  16. Patel K, Madan S, Mehta D, et al. Basal implants: An asset for rehabilitation of atrophied resorbed maxillary and mandibular jaw – A prospective study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2021;11:64–69. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_446_20.
  17. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1986;1(1):11–25. PMID: 3527955.
  18. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17(1):5–15. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059.
  19. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, et al. Success criteria in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2012;91(3):242–248. DOI: 10.1177/0022034511431252.
  20. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Chuang SK, et al. Implant loading protocols for edentulous patients with fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2014;29: 256–270. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g4.3.
  21. Priest G, Smith J, Wilson MG. Implant survival and prosthetic complications of mandibular metal-acrylic resin implant complete fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111(6):466–475. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.027.
  22. Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Fabbri G, et al. Long-term survival and success of zirconia screw-retained implant-supported prostheses for up to 12 years: A retrospective multicenter study. J Prosthet Dent 2023;129(1):S0022-3913(21)00265-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021. 04.026.
  23. Fernandes PG, Filho IGZ, Maluf LR, et al. Immediate load implants: systematic review on the clinical success assessment and follow up. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci 2018;6(2):232. DOI: 10.4172/2376-032X.1000232.
  24. Hjalmarsson L, Gheisarifar M, Jemt T. A systematic review of survival of single implants as presented in longitudinal studies with a follow-up of at least 10 years. Eur J Oral Implantol 2016;9(1):S155–162. PMID: 27314122.
  25. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 4th ed, St. Louis: Mosby, 2015; pp. 420–433. ISBN: 9780323478267.
  26. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, et al. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2(4):145–151. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x.
  27. Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533–535. DOI: 10.3109/00016356309011240.
  28. The International Implant Foundation: Statement of the International Implant Foundation (IF) concerning probing around basal implants (2003), available from: http://www.implantfoundation.org/en/probing-around-basal-implants-2003. (Accessed on: 23 April 2019).
  29. Awadalkreem F, Khalifa N, Satti A, et al. The influence of immediately loaded basal implant treatment on patient satisfaction. Int J Dent 2020;2020:6590202. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6590202.
  30. Mombelli A, Buser D, Lang NP. Colonization of osseointegrated titanium implants in edentulous patients. Early results. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1988;3(3):113–120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.1988.tb00095.x.
  31. Friel T, Waia S. Removable partial dentures for older adults. Prim Dent J 2020;9(3):34–39. DOI: 10.1177/2050168420943435.
  32. Ikeya K, Iwasa F, Inoue Y, et al. Inhibition of denture plaque deposition on complete dentures by 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymer coating: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119(1):67–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.012.
  33. Abreu MH, Bianchini MA, Magini RS, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of periodontal and peri-implant conditions in patients with implant-supported prosthesis. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2007; 20(2):87–95. PMID: 18590257.
  34. Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: Preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implant Res 2009;20(3):219–225. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01717.x.
  35. Misch CE, Wang HL, Misch CM, et al. Rationale for the application of immediate load in implant dentistry: Part II. Implant Dent 2004;13(4):310–321. DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000140461.25451.31.
  36. Sadowsky SJ. Occlusal overload with dental implants: A review. Int J Implant Dent 2019;5(1):29. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-019-0180-8.
  37. Verma M, Nanda A, Sood A. Principles of occlusion in implant dentistry. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2015;7(3):27–33. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0754.172924.
  38. Bozini T, Petridis H, Garefis K, et al. A meta-analysis of prosthodontic complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in edentulous patients after an observation period of at least 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(2):304–318. PMID: 21483883.
  39. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(1): 31–41. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00214-2.
  40. Hegedus F, Diecidue RJ. Trigeminal nerve injuries after mandibular implant placement–practical knowledge for clinicians. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2006;21(1):111–116. PMID: 16519189.
  41. Wang Y, Bäumer D, Ozga AK, et al. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 10 years after implant placement. BMC Oral Health 2021;21(1):30. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01381-3.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.