The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Comparative Assessment of Novel Collagen Cross-linking Agents on Push-out Bond Strength of Two Different Sealers: An In Vitro Study

Jayanthi Govindarajan, Bahavathi Ananthan Hemasathya, Bharath Naga Reddy, Senthil Nathan, Sriram Sankar, Savadamoorthi Kamatchi Subramani

Keywords : Cashew shell liquid, Collagen cross-linking agents, Push-out bond strength

Citation Information : Govindarajan J, Hemasathya BA, Reddy BN, Nathan S, Sankar S, Subramani SK. Comparative Assessment of Novel Collagen Cross-linking Agents on Push-out Bond Strength of Two Different Sealers: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (11):1122-1127.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3439

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-03-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim: To assess the push-out bond strength and tubular penetration of resin-based and bioceramic sealers after employing two collagen cross-linking agents, namely, cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) and epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on sodium hypochlorite treated root canal dentin. Materials and methods: Fifty human permanent mandibular premolars selected were decoronated at CEJ, this was followed by cleaning and shaping protocols, root canals were enlarged up to 20 sizes with 6% taper and were randomly divided into the following 5 groups with 10 samples each based on the cross-linking agent and the sealer: • Group I: Irrigation with saline (control). • Group II: Irrigation with cashew nut shell liquid followed by bioceramic sealer obturation. • Group III: Irrigation with cashew nut shell liquid followed by resin-based sealer obturation. • Group IV: Irrigation with EGCG followed by bioceramic sealer obturation. • Group V: Irrigation with EGCG followed by resin-based sealer obturation. Five specimens in each group were evaluated for push-out bond strength with the universal testing machine while the remaining five specimens in each group were evaluated for depth of sealer penetration by a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data was recorded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results: The push-out bond strength was found to be maximum in the apical region in all the five groups followed by the middle third and coronal region. The maximum push-out bond strength was seen in group II followed by groups III and IV, and least in group V. The mean depth of tubular penetration of sealers was found to be effective in the coronal portion followed by the middle third while the apical third region showed the least depth penetration of sealers into the tubules. The maximum penetration of sealers was revealed in group V followed by groups III and IV, and least in group II. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that push-out bond strength was found to the maximum in specimens irrigated with cashew nut shell liquid and obturated with bioceramic sealer. The maximum push-out bond strength was seen in the apical third of all root canals followed by the middle and coronal region. The scanning microscopic analysis revealed maximum mean tubular penetration in the coronal portion followed by the middle third and apical third. A greater penetration was seen in specimens irrigated with EGCG and obturated with hybrid sealer. Clinical significance: Selection of sealers plays a pivotal role in the success of endodontic therapy. Leakage-related issues can compromise the bond strength enhancing the bond strength can be achieved through the addition of cross-linking agents.

  1. Love RM, Jenkinson HF. Invasion of dentinal tubules by root canal bacteria. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002;13(2):171–183. DOI: 10.1177/154411130201300207.
  2. Prada I, Micó–Muñoz P, Giner–Lluesma T, et al. Update of the therapeutic planning of irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal treatment. A literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11(2): e185–e193. DOI: 10.4317/jced.55560.
  3. Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. Int Dent J 2008;58(6):329–341. DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2008.tb00354.x.
  4. Abou–Rass M, Oglesby SW. The effects of temperature, concentration, and tissue type on the solvent ability of sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 1981;7(8):376–377. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80059-3.
  5. Reyhani MF, Rezagholizadeh Y, Narimani MR, et al. Antibacterial effect of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in root canals. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2017;11(4):215–221. DOI: 10.15171/joddd.2017.038.
  6. Liu Y, Chen M, Yao X, et al. Enhancement in dentin collagen's biological stability after proanthocyanidins treatment in clinically relevant time periods. Dent Mater J 2013;29(4):485–492. DOI: 10.1016/
  7. Cai J, Palamara JE, Burrow MF. Effects of collagen crosslinkers on dentine: A literature review. Calcif Tissue Int 2018;102(3):265–279. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-017-0343-7.
  8. Moreira MA, Souza NO, Sousa RS, et al. Efficacy of new natural biomodification agents from Anacardiaceae extracts on dentin collagen cross-linking. Dent Mater J 2017;33(10):1103–1109. DOI: 10.1016/
  9. Jung IH, Yun JH, Cho AR, et al. Effect of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate on maintaining the periodontal ligament cell viability of avulsed teeth: a preliminary study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2011;41(1):10–16. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.1.10.
  10. Yadav C, Vijayan A. An in vitro comparative study on the bond strength of root dentin after treatment with two different collagen cross linking agents. Phytomedicine 2019;10(3):81–84. DOI:
  11. Park E, Shen YA, Haapasalo M. Irrigation of the apical root canal. Endod Topics 2012;27(1):54–73. DOI: 10.1111/ETP.12028.
  12. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, et al. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54(2):291–312. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.12.001.
  13. von der Fehr FR, Östby BN. Effect of EDTAC and sulfuric acid on root canal dentine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1963;16(2):199–205. DOI:
  14. Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1998;24(7):472–476. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80049-6.
  15. Kanisavaran ZM. Chlorhexidine gluconate in endodontics: An update review. Int Dent J 2008;58(5):247–257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2008.tb00196.x.
  16. Liu Y, Tjäderhane L, Breschi L, et al. Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. Indian J Dent Res 2011;90(8):953–968. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510391799.
  17. Castellan CS, Bedran–Russo AK, Karol S, et al. Long-term stability of dentin matrix following treatment with various natural collagen cross-linkers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4(7):1343–1350. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.003.
  18. Kato MT, Leite AD, Hannas AR, et al. Impact of protease inhibitors on dentin matrix degradation by collagenase. Indian J Dent Res 2012;91(12):1119–1123. DOI: 10.1177/0022034512455801.
  19. Pheenithicharoenkul S, Panichuttra A. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate increased the push out bond strength of an epoxy resin sealer to root dentin. Dent Mater J 2016; 5(6):888–892. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2016-137.
  20. Reddy P, Neelakantan P, Sanjeev K, et al. Effect of irrigant neutralizing reducing agents on the compromised dislocation resistance of an epoxy resin and a methacrylate resin-based root canal sealer in vitro. Int J Adhes Adhes 2018;82:206–210. DOI:
  21. Jain P, Pruthi V, Sikri VK. An ex vivo evaluation of the sealing ability of polydimethylsiloxane-based root canal sealers. Indian J Dent Res 2014;25(3):336–339. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.138332.
  22. Balguerie E. Sluis van der L, Vallaeys K, et al. Sealer penetration and adaptation in the dentinal tubules. A scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2011;37(11):1567–1569. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.005.
  23. Wang Y, Liu S, Dong Y. In vitro study of dentinal tubule penetration and filling quality of bioceramic sealer. PLoS One 2018;13(2):e0192248. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192248.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.