The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2022 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions Using Modified Tunnel Technique with V-reverse Sutures: A Report of Three Cases

Lashika V Tambe, Madhura M Tandale, Radhika Chhibber, David T Wu

Keywords : Autogenous connective tissue graft, Gingival recessions, Modified tunnel technique

Citation Information : Tambe LV, Tandale MM, Chhibber R, Wu DT. Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions Using Modified Tunnel Technique with V-reverse Sutures: A Report of Three Cases. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (2):232-236.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3301

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 10-06-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The clinical case series presents a minimally invasive modified tunnel procedure with autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) using a V-reverse sutures to treat multiple gingival recessions. Background: In periodontal and peri-implant plastic procedures, proper graft and flap stabilization are crucial in the outcomes. The coronally advanced flap allows for better access with the possibility of suturing the graft to the de-epithelialized papillae of the periosteum; there is little evidence with using the V-reverse sutures technique in stabilizing the graft and the flap when performing tunnel techniques (TUN). The following case series presents a minimally invasive modified tunnel procedure with autogenous CTG using V-reverse sutures to treat gingival recessions. Case description: Three patients with Miller Class I maxillary buccal gingival recessions defects were selected for this study. All subjects were treated with the minimally invasive modified tunnel technique with autogenous subepithelial CTG. V-reverse sutures technique was performed to further improve the stability of the graft at the recipient site. Clinical parameters, including mean recession depth and root coverage esthetic score (RES), were recorded at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1-year postoperative follow-up visits. Conclusion: At the 1-year follow-up, complete root coverage was achieved in multiple gingival recessions defect sites. In conclusion, this technique represents an alternative treatment for Miller Class I gingival recessions defects with clinical and esthetically satisfactory outcomes. Clinical significance: Combining the advantages of V-reverse sutures and CTG in the treatment of gingival recessions is feasible and noninvasive.


PDF Share
  1. Vignoletti F, Di Martino M, Clementini M, et al. Prevalence and risk indicators of gingival recessions in an Italian school of dentistry and dental hygiene: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24(2):991–1000. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02996-9.
  2. Aroca S, Keglevich T, Nikolidakis D, et al. Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized-clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37(1):88–97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01492.x.
  3. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Cairo F, et al. The effect of time on root coverage outcomes: a network meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2019;98(11):1195–1203. DOI: 10.1177/0022034519867071.
  4. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, et al. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol 2020;91(1):9–16. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350.
  5. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, et al. The influence of tooth location on the outcomes of multiple adjacent gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap: a multicenter re-analysis study. J Periodontol 2019;90(11):1244–1251. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.18-0732.
  6. Thalmair T, Fickl S, Wachtel H. Coverage of multiple mandibular gingival recessions using tunnel technique with connective tissue graft: a prospective case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016;36(6):859–867. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2278.
  7. Zabalegui I, Sicilia A, Cambra J, et al. Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the tunnel subepithelial connective tissue graft: a clinical report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19(2):199. PMID: 10635186.
  8. Chambrone LA, Chambrone L. Treatment of Miller Class I and II localized recession defects using laterally positioned flaps: a 24-month study. Am J Dent 2009;22(6):339. PMID: 20178209.
  9. Agarwal K, Agarwal K, Gupta K, et al. Zucchelli's technique combined with platelet-rich fibrin for root coverage. Indian J Oral Sci 2012;3(1):49.
  10. Nart J, Valles C, Mareque S, et al. Subepithelial connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally advanced flap for the treatment of Miller Class II and III gingival recessions in mandibular incisors: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32(6):647. PMID: 23057054.
  11. Mutthineni RB, Dudala RB, Ramisetty A. Esthetic root coverage with double papillary subepithelial connective tissue graft: a case report. Case Rep Dent 2014;2014:509319. DOI: 10.1155/2014/509319.
  12. Kim DM, Neiva R. Periodontal soft tissue non–root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP regeneration work shop. J Periodontol 2015;86:S56–S72. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.130684.
  13. Alexiou A, Vouros I, Menexes G, et al. Comparison of enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage in patients with multiple gingival recession defects: a randomized controlled clinical study. Quintessence Int 2017;48(5):381–389. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a38058.
  14. Allen EP. Subpapillary continuous sling suturing method for soft tissue grafting with the tunneling technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30(5):479. PMID: 20814601.
  15. Zadeh HH. Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31(6):653. PMID: 22140667.
  16. Chacón Ramírez GJ, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, et al. “V-Reverse” suturing technique for tunnel soft tissue graft and flap stabilization: technique illustration. Clin Adv Periodont 2021;11(3):129–133. DOI: 10.1002/cap.10134.
  17. Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller Jr PD, et al. Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol 2009;80(4):705–710. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080565.
  18. Fahmy RA, Taalab MR. Modified tunnel technique for management of gingival recession in esthetic zone using acellular dermal matrix versus connective tissue graft. Future Dent J 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.fdj.2018.12.001.
  19. Stein JM, Hammächer C. The modified tunnel technique—Options and indication for mucogingival therapy. Journal de Parodontologie et d'Implantologie Orale 2012;31(1):19.
  20. Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Vach K, et al. Research Group for Oral Soft Tissue Biology & Wound Healing. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 2-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measuring for volumetric comparison of gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol 2020;47(9):1144–1158. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13328.
  21. Rasperini G, Codari M, Limiroli E, et al. Graftless tunnel technique for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions in sites with thick or very thick biotype: a prospective case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2019;39(6):e203–e210. DOI: 10.11607/prd.4134.
  22. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Ravidà A, et al. Influence of suturing technique on marginal flap stability following coronally advanced flap: a cadaver study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23(4):1641–1651. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2597-5.
  23. Hiatt WH, Stallard RE, Butler E, et al. Repair following mucoperiosteal flap surgery with full gingival retention. J Periodontol 1968;39(1): 11–16. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1968.39.1.11.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.