The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Translucency of Various Commercially Available Zirconium Oxide Ceramic Systems: An In Vitro Study

Anupriya Singh, Anuj Bhargava, Jyothis Mathew, Merin K Joseph, Mirza Muzaamill Baig, Shreya Gupta

Keywords : Absorbance, Spectrophotometer, Transmittance, Zirconium oxide ceramic

Citation Information : Singh A, Bhargava A, Mathew J, Joseph MK, Baig MM, Gupta S. Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Translucency of Various Commercially Available Zirconium Oxide Ceramic Systems: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (6):646-651.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3352

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 23-09-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the translucency of various commercially available zirconium oxide ceramic systems, i.e., Ceramill® Zolid Classic, Ceramill® Zi, and DD Bio ZX271 by using a dual beam UV-visible spectrophotometer. Materials and methods: The present study comprised of 21 disk-shaped samples of zirconia for every group, i.e., group I-Ceramill® Zolid Classic, group II-Ceramill Zi®, and group III-DD Bio ZX271. Furthermore, each group was split into three subgroups and every subgroup had seven samples each one of 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 mm thickness. The samples were prepared by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system devised by Amann Girrbach AG in accord with the steps provided by the manufacturer. The entire sample was designed having 10 mm in diameter with 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 mm thickness for every group. The UV-visible dual beam spectrophotometer equipped with D2 lamp and W lamp was used for the measurement of absorbance and transmittance in order to assess the translucency of the fabricated zirconia samples. Results: The mean value of transmittance % for Ceramill® Zi at 0.8 mm came out to be 0.849 ± 0.024, i.e., the least among all, whereas the mean value of Ceramill® Zolid Classic was 1.408 ± 0.033, being the highest for the same thickness. DD Bio ZX271 had an intermediate value of 1.274 ± 0.012. The mean value of absorbance for Ceramill® Zi at 0.8 mm came out to be 2.086 ± 0.013, i.e., the maximum among all, whereas the mean value of Ceramill® Zolid Classic was, being the lowest for the same thickness. DD Bio ZX271 had an intermediate value of 1.902 ± 0.004. Conclusion: The present study data suggest that all the materials subjected to evaluation exhibited a substantial translucency. We attempted to study few of the desirable properties, these materials should possess when used for prosthetic rehabilitation with esthetic contentment a clinical setup. There has been an ambiguous distinction that Ceramill® Zi Zirconia supersedes the Ceramill® Zolid Classic and DD Bio ZX271. Furthermore, 0.8 mm thickness substantiates to be the most ideal among 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 mm. Clinical significance: The desired outcome of the procedure becomes dependent solely on the clinician's judgment to opt for the material whose properties are most fitting as per the demands of the esthetics. While a clinician should always be ambitious, but a good clinician should also bear in mind that the success of any treatment procedure not only depends on the assortment of properties of these materials but also the host response and satisfaction evoked by these materials.


PDF Share
  1. Lee YK, Cha HS, Ahn JS. Layered color of all-ceramic core and veneer ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(5):279–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.03.010.
  2. Kamishima N, Ikeda T, Sano H. Color and translucency of resin composites for layering techniques. Dent Mater J 2005;24(3):428–432. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.24.428.
  3. Wang F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110(1):14–20. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60333-9.
  4. Johnston WM, Reisbick MH. Color and translucency changes during and after curing of esthetic restorative material. Dent Mater 1997;13(2):89–97. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80017-6.
  5. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, et al. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(1):10–15. PMID: 12239473.
  6. Morgan J. Introduction to Geometric and Physical Optics. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Co.,1953. https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.134022/2015.134022.Introduction-To-Geometrical-And-Physical-Optics_djvu.txt.
  7. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, et al. Relative translucency of six all ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(1):4–9. PMID: 12239472.
  8. Kim SJ, Son HH, Cho BH, et al. Translucency and masking ability of various opaque-shade composite resins. J Dent 2009;37(2): 102–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.10.002.
  9. Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Meegdes M, et al. The influence of porcelain layer thickness on the final shade of ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(6):563–570. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00517-1.
  10. Ozcelik TB, Yilmaz B, Ozcan I, et al. Colorimetric analysis of opaque porcelain fired to different base metal alloys used in metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99(3):193–202. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60043-8.
  11. Douglas RD, Brewer JD. Variability of porcelain color reproduction by commercial laboratories. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(4):339–346. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00513-4.
  12. Yilmaz B, Karaagaclioglu L. In vitro evaluation of color replication of metal ceramic specimens using visual and instrumental color determinations. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(1):21–27. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60185-0.
  13. Kourtis SG, Tripodakis AP, Doukoudakis AA. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of different metal alloys and porcelains in the metal-ceramic complex. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(5):477–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.012.
  14. Baldissara P, Llukacej A, Ciocca L, et al. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104(1):6–12. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60086-8.
  15. Liu MC, Aquilino SA, Lund PS, et al. Human perception of dental porcelain translucency correlated to spectrophotometric measurements. J Prosthodont 2010;19(3):187–193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00542.x.
  16. Spyropoulou PE, Giroux EC, Razzoog ME, et al. Translucency of shaded zirconia core material. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(5):304–307. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60056-5.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.