The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Anatomical Investigation of C-shaped Root Canal Systems of Mandibular Molars in a Middle Eastern Population: A CBCT Study

Maria Feghali, Carla Jabre, Gaby Haddad

Keywords : Cone–beam computed tomography, Mandibular molars, Root canal morphology

Citation Information : Feghali M, Jabre C, Haddad G. Anatomical Investigation of C-shaped Root Canal Systems of Mandibular Molars in a Middle Eastern Population: A CBCT Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (7):713-719.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3374

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 10-11-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to identify the prevalence of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular first and second molars in a Lebanese population, and to determine the relationship between C-shaped root canal systems and different factors (age, gender, and tooth location) and to examine the root canal system's morphology along the root. Materials and methods: The presence of C-shaped root canal systems in 648 mandibular molars from 257 patients was analyzed using cone–beam computed tomography (CBCT). The sample included 296 and 352 mandibular first and second molars, respectively. The frequency of C-shaped canals, their relationship to gender, age, and tooth location, and unilateral or bilateral occurrences were noted. A 3D Slicer 4.10.1 was then used to classify teeth with identified C-shaped anatomy according to Fan's configuration and to determine the distance between the orifice and the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Results: C-shaped root canal systems were detected in 1.01 and 9.09% of mandibular first and second molars, respectively. In mandibular second molars, the most prevalent configurations were as follows: C1 at the orifice level, C3 at orifice-2 mm, C2 and C3 in the middle third, and C3 at the apical level. There was no correlation with age, gender, and tooth position. The bilateral occurrence happened in 60% of cases. Orifices were at a mean distance of 3.32 mm below the CEJ. The deepest groove was mostly lingual. Conclusion: The prevalence of C-shaped root canal systems in the Lebanese population is 1.01 and 9.09% in the first and second mandibular molars, respectively. The CBCT slices showed that the configuration varies along the root and that the orifices are at various distances below the CEJ. Therefore, pre-operatory scans can be beneficial for better understanding and preparation of root canal treatment. Clinical significance: In the Lebanese population, C-shaped mandibular molars are not a rare finding. Clinicians should consider the different configurations and the possible changes along the root.


PDF Share
  1. Fan B, Cheung GSP, Fan M, et al. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: Part I – Anatomical features. J Endod 2004;30(12):899–903. DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000136207.12204.e4.
  2. Kim Y, Lee D, Kim DV, et al. Analysis of cause of endodontic failure of C-shaped root canals. Scanning 2018;2018:2516832. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2516832.
  3. Fernandes M, de Ataide I, Wagle R. C-shaped root canal configuration: A review of literature. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(4):312–319. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.136437.
  4. Melton DC, Krell KV, Fuller MW. Anatomical and histological features of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars. J Endod 1991;17(8):384–388. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81990-4.
  5. Grocholewicz K, Lipski M, Weyna E. Endodontic and prosthetic treatment of teeth with C-shaped root canals. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2009;55(3):55–59. PMID: 20698179.
  6. Al-Fouzan KS. C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in a Saudi Arabian population. Int Endod J 2002;35(6):499–504. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00512.x.
  7. Naseri M, Haghighi AK, Kharazifard MJ, et al. Prevalence of C-shaped root canals in Iranian population: A systematic review. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10(2):186–196. PMID: 23724219.
  8. Weine FS. The C-shaped mandibular second molar: Incidence and other considerations. Members of the Arizona Endodontic Association. J Endod 1998;24(5):372–375. DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(98)80137-4.
  9. Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molar teeth in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 2009;42(9):775–784. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01578.x.
  10. de Azevedo KRV, Lopes CB, Andrade RHTLR, et al. C-shaped canals in first and second mandibular molars from Brazilian individuals: A prevalence study using cone–beam computed tomography. PLoS ONE 2019 14(2):e0211948. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211948.
  11. Haddad GY, Nehme WB, Ounsi HF. Diagnosis, classification, and frequency of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in the Lebanese population. J Endod 1999;25(4):268–271. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80157-5.
  12. Kim SY, Kim BS, Kim Y. Mandibular second molar root canal morphology and variants in a Korean subpopulation. Int Endod J 2016;49(2):136–144. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12437.
  13. Roy A, Astekar M, Bansal R, et al. Racial predilection of C-shaped canal configuration in the mandibular second molar. J Conserv Dent 2019;22(2):133–138. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_369_18.
  14. Lambrianidis T, Lyroudia K, Pandelidou O, et al. Evaluation of periapical radiographs in the recognition of C-shaped mandibular second molars. Int Endod J 2001;34(6):458–462. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00417.x.
  15. Martins JNR, Mata A, Marques D, et al. Prevalence of C-shaped mandibular molars in the Portuguese population evaluated by cone–beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent 2016;10(4):529–535. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.195175.
  16. Manning SA. Root canal anatomy of mandibular second molars. Part II. C-shaped canals. Int Endod J 1990;23(1):40–45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1990.tb00801.x.
  17. Barnett F. Mandibular molar with C-shaped canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2(2):79–81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00131.x.
  18. Kato A, Ziegler A, Higuchi N, et al. Aetiology, incidence and morphology of the C-shaped root canal system and its impact on clinical endodontics. Int Endod J 2014;47(11):1012–1033. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12256.
  19. von Zuben M, Martins JNR, Berti L, et al. Worldwide prevalence of mandibular second molar C-shaped morphologies evaluated by cone–beam computed tomography. J Endod 2017;43(9):1442–1447. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.016.
  20. Janani M, Rahimi S, Jafari F, et al. Anatomic features of C-shaped mandibular second molars in a selected Iranian population using CBCT. Iran Endod J 2018;13(1):120–125. DOI: 10.22037/iej.v13i1.17286.
  21. Helvacioglu-Yigit D, Sinanoglu A. Use of cone–beam computed tomography to evaluate C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in a Turkish subpopulation: A retrospective study. Int Endod J 2013;46(11):1032–1038. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12094.
  22. Kantilieraki E, Delantoni A, Angelopoulos C, et al. Evaluation of root and root canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in a Greek population: A CBCT study. Eur Endod J 2019;4(2):62–68. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2019.19480.
  23. Demirbuga S, Sekerci AE, Dinçer AN, et al. Use of cone–beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18(4):e737–e744. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.18473.
  24. Nejaim Y, Gomes AF, Rosado LdePL, et al. C-shaped canals in mandibular molars of a Brazilian subpopulation: Prevalence and root canal configuration using cone–beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24(9):3299–3305. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03207-6.
  25. Cooke HG, Cox FL. C-shaped canal configurations in mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99(5):836–839. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0402.
  26. Sinanoglu A, Helvacioglu-Yigit D. Analysis of C-shaped canals by panoramic radiography and cone–beam computed tomography: Root-type specificity by longitudinal distribution. J Endod 2014;40(7):917–921. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.014.
  27. Torres A, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P, et al. Characterization of mandibular molar root and canal morphology using cone beam computed tomography and its variability in Belgian and Chilean population samples. Imaging Sci Dent 2015;45(2):95–101. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.2.95.
  28. Yang SE, Lee TY, Kim KJ. Prevalence and morphology of C-shaped canals: A CBCT analysis in a Korean population. Scanning 2021;2021:9152004. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9152004.
  29. Jin GC, Lee SJ, Roh BD. Anatomical study of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars by analysis of computed tomography. J Endod 2006;32(1):10–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.007.
  30. Zheng Q, Zhang L, Zhou X, et al. C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars in a Chinese population evaluated by cone–beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2011;44(9):857–862. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01896.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.